Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH) Trial - Data Linking Request
Queen Mary University of London · Academic
Expired The latest version ended on 31 March 2021. The September 2026 register still lists the agreement, but its term has passed.
- Reference
- DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y
- Latest version
- v4.2
- Term of latest version
- 1 October 2020 to 31 March 2021
- Start date
- Before 18 June 2018
- Data controller
- Sole Data Controller
- Commercial purposes
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Files released to date
- 0
Why the data was released
Objective for processing
This Data Sharing Agreement permits the retention of the data provided under previous iterations of this Agreement for an interim period. This is a pragmatic approach to provide an active Agreement whilst enabling Queen Mary University London to complete the necessary actions to enable a subsequent application to extend the Agreement meeting all applicable data sharing standards as published in NHS Digital’s website (see: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-access-request-service-dars/dars-guidance).
The following provides background information on the purpose of the original study:
More than 150,000 high-risk patients undergo emergency surgery each year in the NHS, following which at least 90,000 patients develop complications resulting in over 20,000 deaths before hospital discharge. Patients who develop complications but survive, require in-hospital care for prolonged periods, suffering substantial reductions in functional independence and long-term survival. Recent data show that abdominal surgery and the need for surgery on an emergency basis are amongst the strongest factors associated with poor post-operative outcome. Around 35,000 patients present to NHS hospitals each year with precisely this pattern of risk and undergo a procedure known as ‘emergency laparotomy’. This term describes a major surgical procedure to treat an acute and often life threatening problem with the gut or other abdominal organ. Around 180 patients undergo emergency laparotomy in a typical NHS hospital each year with a 90-day mortality of 25%. There is considerable heterogeneity in standards of care between hospitals, including wide variations in the involvement of senior surgeons and anaesthetists and post-operative admission to critical care, which are associated with important differences in mortality rates.
In 2010 the Department of Health commissioned a Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) working group to develop an integrated care pathway which could improve the quality of care for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. An integrated care pathway was defined which represented an optimal standard of peri-operative care deliverable in all NHS hospitals. Examples of interventions included consultant led decision making and treatment, standards for diagnostic testing, structured post-operative surveillance, time limits for review of deteriorating patients and early admission to critical care. To date, there has been little systematic implementation of any component of the integrated care pathway.
Most opinion leaders agree there is an urgent need for a national project to improve survival for emergency laparotomy patients. However, there is uncertainty about how best to achieve such improvement. Some question the benefits of quality improvement initiatives, pointing to the lack of robust clinical evidence of effectiveness, both in terms of generic methodologies advocated to improve quality, and the specific changes in patient care. There are examples where a discrete quality improvement intervention was associated with improved clinical outcomes and experience from recent quality improvement initiatives has shown that challenges with quality improvement programmes can be overcome. However, doubts over the clinical effectiveness of quality improvement projects continue to limit the success of these initiatives. There is a clear need for robust clinical evidence to support or refute the use of this approach to improve clinical practice and, ultimately, patient outcome.
The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) has commissioned a new National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA), providing a unique opportunity to study the clinical effectiveness of a quality improvement project to implement an integrated peri-operative care pathway for emergency laparotomy patients. By providing a robust evidence base for quality improvement in peri-operative care, the findings of this work could accelerate implementation of care pathways for all categories of high-risk surgery with the potential for widespread improvements in survival affecting more than 170,000 NHS patients each year.
QMUL have conducted a large pragmatic clinical trial of the effectiveness of a quality improvement project to implement a modified version of the RCS integrated care pathway to improve patient outcomes following emergency laparotomy, to which this agreement relates. The trial is called Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH). QMUL aim is to provide the definitive evidence needed to inform practice in this area.
TRIAL OBJECTIVES:
1. To evaluate the effect of a quality improvement intervention to promote the implementation of an integrated peri-operative care pathway on survival at 90 days following emergency laparotomy.
2. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the quality improvement intervention compared to ongoing clinical practice without the intervention.
3. To evaluate the long-term effects of the intervention on standards of care and mortality following emergency laparotomy in participating hospitals.
Primary outcome measures:
All cause mortality at 90 days following surgery
Secondary outcome measures:
All cause mortality at 180 days following surgery, duration of hospital stay and hospital re-admission within 180 days of surgery. In eight hospitals EQ-5D 3L will be collected and healthcare resource use data preoperatively, and at 90 and 180 days after surgery to perform a health economics analysis.
In eight hospitals a Health Economics sub-study has been conducted. This involved patients who are already part of the NELA audit. QMUL consented patients and collected information (at 30, 90 and 180 days after surgery) about their quality of life and healthcare use using standardised questionnaires. The information that was recorded on paper questionnaires was entered into a secure, password protected database hosted by Queen Mary University London. No identifiable information was recorded in the database. Each patient in the Health Economics sub-study has a NELA ID which will be used to link with the main NELA dataset and data from ONS and HES. The team will collect EQ-5D 3L (a standardized questionnaire for measuring generic health status and quality of life) and healthcare resource use data preoperatively, and at 90 and 180 days after surgery to perform a health economics analysis which aims to assess whether implementing the quality improvement intervention is likely to be cost-effective on average and whether this varies between low and high mortality groups.
As a national clinical audit funded by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) has been established with the fundamental aim of improving the quality of patient care, and clinical outcomes. The EPOCH trial is an important example of how the data collected by NELA can be used to drive improvements in patient care.
Processing activities
Under this Agreement, the data may be securely stored but not otherwise processed. No new data will be provided by NHS Digital under this Agreement.
The study data, including data provided by NHS Digital under previous agreements, are currently held by Queen Mary University London.
The following provides background on the processing activities undertaken prior to this Agreement:
Step 1 - RCS flowed NHS number to NHS Digital, NHS Digital flowed HES + mortality data to RCS with Objections upheld, this step has been completed under another agreement.
Step 2 - QMUL applied to NHS Digital for HES + mortality data (this application).
Step 3 - NHS Digital confirmed to HQIP that QMUL have approval for the release HES + mortality data
Step 4 - RCS flowed HES ID + study ID to NHS Digital to define cohort
Step 5 - NHS Digital sent study ID’s to RCS with objections upheld
Step 6 - QMUL applied separately to HQIP for audit data
Step 7 - NHS Digital flowed HES + mortality data to QMUL, (with study ID) with objections upheld
Step 8 - HQIP authorised RCS to flow the audit data to QMUL
Step 9 - RCS flowed authorised audit data to QMUL
Step 10 - QMUL has started to perform linkage of HES/mortality data and Audit data based on a study id, and this will continue under this agreement.
Step 11 - QMUL has started to perform linkage of HES/mortality and Audit data with Heath Economic sub-study data based on a study id, and this will continue under this agreement.
The full Date of Death is required to be able to calculate survival at 2 time points (90 day, 180 day). The EPOCH team will not use Date of Death or cause of death to identify any individual patients. To be clear no attempt will be made at any point to re-identify and individual. In line with good practice, QMUL retains raw data to enable responses to journal peer reviews and re-analysis if required. Therefore the raw data received from NHS Digital will only be held for the duration of this two year agreement and will then be destroyed. The research data produced for this study will be archived for 20 years which is in line with QMUL procedure.
The data received from NHS Digital will not be linked back to the identifiable NELA database. An extract of anonymised NELA data will be linked to the HES and the mortality data via the NELA ID.
The anonymised NELA data and the HES and mortality data will also be linked to a Health Economics (HE) dataset via the NELA ID. The HE dataset does not contain any identifiers. Each patient in the Health Economics (HE) dataset also exists in the NELA dataset, and their NELA ID has been recorded in both datasets. The data has been collected as part of an ethically approved sub-study for the EPOCH trial, using patient consent.
The EPOCH team Statisticians and Health Economists who will work on the linked dataset do not have access to the identifiable data set held by the RoCA or any identifiers held locally at hospitals.
Only Queen Mary University Staff will have access to the data. The EPOCH team at QMUL will analyse the data in a secure environment with restricted access (called a safe haven) to assess the objectives listed. Outputs from the EPOCH analysis will only include aggregated data, no individual level data will ever leave the safe haven where the analysis is taking place.
All organisations party to this agreement must comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data).
Expected output
This Agreement permits the secure retention of the data only and no other processing.
No new outputs will be produced under this Data Sharing Agreement.
The following outputs were previously planned/executed:
Final Report to Funder - May 2019
Final EPOCH Investigators Meeting - spring 2019
Peer Reviewed Publications - Spring 2019 - Spring 2021
Conferences and meetings - 2019 - ongoing
Media – 2019 – ongoing
NELA Website - 2019
Details of expected outputs:
Although the final report was sent to the funder in May 2019 QMUL are still processing and analysing the data to produce further papers.
The main scientific report containing only aggregated data with small numbers supressed in line with the HES analysis guide was sent to the Lancet journal for their consideration. The Lancet published the paper in April 2019. The Lancet have also published the trial protocol.
QMUL will also present the work at scientific meetings, and congresses. For example the ‘Annual Congress of Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Medicine’ and the ‘Peri-Operative Medicine Congress’. QMUL will also disseminate the aggregated findings through the mainstream media (e.g. BBC news, Channel 4 News, Times Newspaper etc.) and also through social media (e.g. Twitter) with the support of QMUL patient representatives. The main target audience will be surgeons, anaesthetists and intensive care doctors but also patients and their carers.
The findings will also be published on the NELA and EPOCH websites. All outputs will aggregated with small numbers supressed in line with the HES analysis guide.
Expected measurable benefits
This Agreement permits the secure retention of the data only and no other processing.
The following is information previously provided to show the benefits that had been anticipated.
NELA has become a successful audit and is already tracking some improvements in patient outcomes nationally. However feedback from hospitals is that it can be difficult for them to know what changes to make that are most likely to lead to sustained improved outcomes for patients, or how best to bring about these improvements.
EPOCH is built around a trial of a systematic and specific improvement intervention: a quality improvement programme itself (both the ethnography and also through a process evaluation of the trial). Access to HES and ONS data is essential so that QMUL can analyse and report the impact of the improvement intervention in terms of quality of care and patient outcome. Once QMUL know the outcomes of the trial, QMUL will be able to deduce evidence-based recommendations about what works and what does not work in improving care for this patient group, thereby allowing frontline clinicians and managers to make informed decisions about how best to improve patient care. Further to this, QMUL will gain an understanding of quality improvement as a process in the NHS (in terms of feasibility and impact) which will be informative for commissioners and policymakers.
Due to the synergy between EPOCH and NELA, with the latter providing an ongoing data set to support quality improvement, QMUL could expect to begin to see this accelerated improvement commence within months of publication of the trial results. This is because hospitals will be able to track their improvements through ongoing participation in NELA.
Publications will allow widespread dissemination of the findings amongst health professionals. Publishing in peer-reviewed journals will allow greater discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the results, and will provide the benefit of peer-review of the work from third parties.
Through dissemination in publications and at meetings (please see ‘Outputs’) results about what did and didn’t work in the clinical care pathway will reach frontline clinicians (surgeons, anaesthetists and intensive care doctors). Therefore, QMUL would expect to see measurable benefits, for emergency laparotomy patients nationwide, within 6-12 months of publication.
QMUL believe this work will influence/trigger a sustained and widespread peri-operative quality improvement for all high-risk patients over a much longer period, with sustained and measurable benefits seen over a 2-10 year period from publication.
A further measurable benefit is the anticipated contribution of the outputs produced as a result of the trial to clinical guidance and national policy within a 1-2 year period from publication.
Benefits reported so far
In any subsequent application to extend this Data Sharing Agreement, Queen Mary University London will be required to provide details of any benefits to patients and/or to the wider healthcare system arising from the outputs produced using the data since 2017.
Datasets on the latest version
Legal basis for provision: Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)
| Dataset | Type of data | Sensitivity | Frequency | Confidential data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civil Registrations of Death - Secondary Care Cut | Identifiable | Sensitive | One-Off | Section 251 NHS Act 2006 |
| HES:Civil Registration (Deaths) bridge | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Non-Sensitive | One-Off | Section 251 NHS Act 2006 |
| Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC) | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Non-Sensitive | One-Off | Section 251 NHS Act 2006 |
Files released
Files released counts only files released externally by DARS. Access granted in NHS England's own systems, such as its Secure Data Environment, is not included.
No files recorded as released under this agreement.
Version history
The register lists each renewal of this agreement as a separate row. This site has 3 versions — earlier versions existed before this site's records begin.
DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v4.2 1 October 2020 to 31 March 2021
- Title
- Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH) Trial - Data Linking Request
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 3
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Civil Registrations of Death - Secondary Care Cut; HES:Civil Registration (Deaths) bridge; Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC)
What changed from DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v3.3
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2020-10-01 | |
| End date | 2021-03-31 |
Unchanged: Objective for processing, Processing activities, Expected output, Expected measurable benefits, Benefits reported.
DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v3.3 18 June 2020 to 30 September 2020
- Title
- Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH) Trial - Data Linking Request
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 3
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Civil Registrations of Death - Secondary Care Cut; HES:Civil Registration (Deaths) bridge; Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC)
What changed from DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v2.4
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2020-06-18 | |
| End date | 2020-09-30 | |
| HES:Civil Registration (Deaths) bridge: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii) |
Objective for processing
This Data Sharing Agreement permits the retention of the data provided under previous iterations of this Agreement for an interim period. This is a pragmatic approach to provide an active Agreement whilst enabling Queen Mary University London to complete the necessary actions to enable a subsequent application to extend the Agreement meeting all applicable data sharing standards as published in NHS Digital’s website (see: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-access-request-service-dars/dars-guidance).
The following provides background information on the purpose of the original study:
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
Most opinion leaders agree there is an urgent need for a national
[56 words unchanged]
examples where a discrete quality improvement intervention was associated with improved clinical
outcomes. And
outcomes and
experience from recent quality improvement initiatives has shown that challenges with quality
[37 words unchanged]
use of this approach to improve clinical practice and, ultimately, patient outcome.
[12 paragraphs unchanged]
Processing activities
The processing activities that took place are -
Under this Agreement, the data may be securely stored but not otherwise processed. No new data will be provided by NHS Digital under this Agreement.
The study data, including data provided by NHS Digital under previous agreements, are currently held by Queen Mary University London.
The following provides background on the processing activities undertaken prior to this Agreement:
[17 paragraphs unchanged]
Expected output
The following outputs are planned:
This Agreement permits the secure retention of the data only and no other processing.
Final Report to Funder - 15th August 2018
No new outputs will be produced under this Data Sharing Agreement.
Final EPOCH Investigators Meeting - summer 2018
The following outputs were previously planned/executed:
Peer Reviewed Publications - Autumn 2018
Final Report to Funder - May 2019
Conferences and meetings - 2018 - ongoing
Final EPOCH Investigators Meeting - spring 2019
Media – 2018 – ongoing
Peer Reviewed Publications - Spring 2019 - Spring 2021
NELA Website - 2018
Conferences and meetings - 2019 - ongoing
Media – 2019 – ongoing
NELA Website - 2019
[1 paragraph unchanged]
Although the final report
will be
was
sent to the funder
on 15 August 2018
in May 2019
QMUL
will process
are still processing
and
analysis
analysing
the data to produce further papers.
The main scientific report containing only aggregated data with small numbers supressed in line with the HES analysis guide
will be
was
sent to the Lancet journal for their
consideration first.
consideration. The Lancet published the paper in April 2019.
The Lancet have
already
also
published the trial
protocol, and have expressed an interest in the work. Second choices would include the British Medical Journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association. These are all general interest journals read by a wide range of healthcare workers worldwide.
protocol.
QMUL plan to invite all the co-investigators (from 92 hospitals) to a final EPOCH meeting where QMUL will disseminate and discuss the findings.
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
Expected measurable benefits
This Agreement permits the secure retention of the data only and no other processing. The following is information previously provided to show the benefits that had been anticipated. [7 paragraphs unchanged]
Benefits reported
As data analysis is ongoing, yielded benefits cannot yet be articulated.
In any subsequent application to extend this Data Sharing Agreement, Queen Mary University London will be required to provide details of any benefits to patients and/or to the wider healthcare system arising from the outputs produced using the data since 2017.
Objective for processing
This Data Sharing Agreement permits the retention of the data provided under previous iterations of this Agreement for an interim period. This is a pragmatic approach to provide an active Agreement whilst enabling Queen Mary University London to complete the necessary actions to enable a subsequent application to extend the Agreement meeting all applicable data sharing standards as published in NHS Digital’s website (see: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-access-request-service-dars/dars-guidance).
The following provides background information on the purpose of the original study:
More than 150,000 high-risk patients undergo emergency surgery each year in the NHS, following which at least 90,000 patients develop complications resulting in over 20,000 deaths before hospital discharge. Patients who develop complications but survive, require in-hospital care for prolonged periods, suffering substantial reductions in functional independence and long-term survival. Recent data show that abdominal surgery and the need for surgery on an emergency basis are amongst the strongest factors associated with poor post-operative outcome. Around 35,000 patients present to NHS hospitals each year with precisely this pattern of risk and undergo a procedure known as ‘emergency laparotomy’. This term describes a major surgical procedure to treat an acute and often life threatening problem with the gut or other abdominal organ. Around 180 patients undergo emergency laparotomy in a typical NHS hospital each year with a 90-day mortality of 25%. There is considerable heterogeneity in standards of care between hospitals, including wide variations in the involvement of senior surgeons and anaesthetists and post-operative admission to critical care, which are associated with important differences in mortality rates.
In 2010 the Department of Health commissioned a Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) working group to develop an integrated care pathway which could improve the quality of care for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. An integrated care pathway was defined which represented an optimal standard of peri-operative care deliverable in all NHS hospitals. Examples of interventions included consultant led decision making and treatment, standards for diagnostic testing, structured post-operative surveillance, time limits for review of deteriorating patients and early admission to critical care. To date, there has been little systematic implementation of any component of the integrated care pathway.
Most opinion leaders agree there is an urgent need for a national project to improve survival for emergency laparotomy patients. However, there is uncertainty about how best to achieve such improvement. Some question the benefits of quality improvement initiatives, pointing to the lack of robust clinical evidence of effectiveness, both in terms of generic methodologies advocated to improve quality, and the specific changes in patient care. There are examples where a discrete quality improvement intervention was associated with improved clinical outcomes and experience from recent quality improvement initiatives has shown that challenges with quality improvement programmes can be overcome. However, doubts over the clinical effectiveness of quality improvement projects continue to limit the success of these initiatives. There is a clear need for robust clinical evidence to support or refute the use of this approach to improve clinical practice and, ultimately, patient outcome.
The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) has commissioned a new National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA), providing a unique opportunity to study the clinical effectiveness of a quality improvement project to implement an integrated peri-operative care pathway for emergency laparotomy patients. By providing a robust evidence base for quality improvement in peri-operative care, the findings of this work could accelerate implementation of care pathways for all categories of high-risk surgery with the potential for widespread improvements in survival affecting more than 170,000 NHS patients each year.
QMUL have conducted a large pragmatic clinical trial of the effectiveness of a quality improvement project to implement a modified version of the RCS integrated care pathway to improve patient outcomes following emergency laparotomy, to which this agreement relates. The trial is called Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH). QMUL aim is to provide the definitive evidence needed to inform practice in this area.
TRIAL OBJECTIVES:
1. To evaluate the effect of a quality improvement intervention to promote the implementation of an integrated peri-operative care pathway on survival at 90 days following emergency laparotomy.
2. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the quality improvement intervention compared to ongoing clinical practice without the intervention.
3. To evaluate the long-term effects of the intervention on standards of care and mortality following emergency laparotomy in participating hospitals.
Primary outcome measures:
All cause mortality at 90 days following surgery
Secondary outcome measures:
All cause mortality at 180 days following surgery, duration of hospital stay and hospital re-admission within 180 days of surgery. In eight hospitals EQ-5D 3L will be collected and healthcare resource use data preoperatively, and at 90 and 180 days after surgery to perform a health economics analysis.
In eight hospitals a Health Economics sub-study has been conducted. This involved patients who are already part of the NELA audit. QMUL consented patients and collected information (at 30, 90 and 180 days after surgery) about their quality of life and healthcare use using standardised questionnaires. The information that was recorded on paper questionnaires was entered into a secure, password protected database hosted by Queen Mary University London. No identifiable information was recorded in the database. Each patient in the Health Economics sub-study has a NELA ID which will be used to link with the main NELA dataset and data from ONS and HES. The team will collect EQ-5D 3L (a standardized questionnaire for measuring generic health status and quality of life) and healthcare resource use data preoperatively, and at 90 and 180 days after surgery to perform a health economics analysis which aims to assess whether implementing the quality improvement intervention is likely to be cost-effective on average and whether this varies between low and high mortality groups.
As a national clinical audit funded by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) has been established with the fundamental aim of improving the quality of patient care, and clinical outcomes. The EPOCH trial is an important example of how the data collected by NELA can be used to drive improvements in patient care.
Expected output
This Agreement permits the secure retention of the data only and no other processing.
No new outputs will be produced under this Data Sharing Agreement.
The following outputs were previously planned/executed:
Final Report to Funder - May 2019
Final EPOCH Investigators Meeting - spring 2019
Peer Reviewed Publications - Spring 2019 - Spring 2021
Conferences and meetings - 2019 - ongoing
Media – 2019 – ongoing
NELA Website - 2019
Details of expected outputs:
Although the final report was sent to the funder in May 2019 QMUL are still processing and analysing the data to produce further papers.
The main scientific report containing only aggregated data with small numbers supressed in line with the HES analysis guide was sent to the Lancet journal for their consideration. The Lancet published the paper in April 2019. The Lancet have also published the trial protocol.
QMUL will also present the work at scientific meetings, and congresses. For example the ‘Annual Congress of Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Medicine’ and the ‘Peri-Operative Medicine Congress’. QMUL will also disseminate the aggregated findings through the mainstream media (e.g. BBC news, Channel 4 News, Times Newspaper etc.) and also through social media (e.g. Twitter) with the support of QMUL patient representatives. The main target audience will be surgeons, anaesthetists and intensive care doctors but also patients and their carers.
The findings will also be published on the NELA and EPOCH websites. All outputs will aggregated with small numbers supressed in line with the HES analysis guide.
Benefits reported
In any subsequent application to extend this Data Sharing Agreement, Queen Mary University London will be required to provide details of any benefits to patients and/or to the wider healthcare system arising from the outputs produced using the data since 2017.
DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v2.4 18 June 2018 to 17 June 2020
- Title
- Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH) Trial - Data Linking Request
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 3
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Civil Registrations of Death - Secondary Care Cut; HES:Civil Registration (Deaths) bridge; Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC)
Objective for processing
More than 150,000 high-risk patients undergo emergency surgery each year in the NHS, following which at least 90,000 patients develop complications resulting in over 20,000 deaths before hospital discharge. Patients who develop complications but survive, require in-hospital care for prolonged periods, suffering substantial reductions in functional independence and long-term survival. Recent data show that abdominal surgery and the need for surgery on an emergency basis are amongst the strongest factors associated with poor post-operative outcome. Around 35,000 patients present to NHS hospitals each year with precisely this pattern of risk and undergo a procedure known as ‘emergency laparotomy’. This term describes a major surgical procedure to treat an acute and often life threatening problem with the gut or other abdominal organ. Around 180 patients undergo emergency laparotomy in a typical NHS hospital each year with a 90-day mortality of 25%. There is considerable heterogeneity in standards of care between hospitals, including wide variations in the involvement of senior surgeons and anaesthetists and post-operative admission to critical care, which are associated with important differences in mortality rates.
In 2010 the Department of Health commissioned a Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) working group to develop an integrated care pathway which could improve the quality of care for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. An integrated care pathway was defined which represented an optimal standard of peri-operative care deliverable in all NHS hospitals. Examples of interventions included consultant led decision making and treatment, standards for diagnostic testing, structured post-operative surveillance, time limits for review of deteriorating patients and early admission to critical care. To date, there has been little systematic implementation of any component of the integrated care pathway.
Most opinion leaders agree there is an urgent need for a national project to improve survival for emergency laparotomy patients. However, there is uncertainty about how best to achieve such improvement. Some question the benefits of quality improvement initiatives, pointing to the lack of robust clinical evidence of effectiveness, both in terms of generic methodologies advocated to improve quality, and the specific changes in patient care. There are examples where a discrete quality improvement intervention was associated with improved clinical outcomes. And experience from recent quality improvement initiatives has shown that challenges with quality improvement programmes can be overcome. However, doubts over the clinical effectiveness of quality improvement projects continue to limit the success of these initiatives. There is a clear need for robust clinical evidence to support or refute the use of this approach to improve clinical practice and, ultimately, patient outcome.
The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) has commissioned a new National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA), providing a unique opportunity to study the clinical effectiveness of a quality improvement project to implement an integrated peri-operative care pathway for emergency laparotomy patients. By providing a robust evidence base for quality improvement in peri-operative care, the findings of this work could accelerate implementation of care pathways for all categories of high-risk surgery with the potential for widespread improvements in survival affecting more than 170,000 NHS patients each year.
QMUL have conducted a large pragmatic clinical trial of the effectiveness of a quality improvement project to implement a modified version of the RCS integrated care pathway to improve patient outcomes following emergency laparotomy, to which this agreement relates. The trial is called Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH). QMUL aim is to provide the definitive evidence needed to inform practice in this area.
TRIAL OBJECTIVES:
1. To evaluate the effect of a quality improvement intervention to promote the implementation of an integrated peri-operative care pathway on survival at 90 days following emergency laparotomy.
2. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the quality improvement intervention compared to ongoing clinical practice without the intervention.
3. To evaluate the long-term effects of the intervention on standards of care and mortality following emergency laparotomy in participating hospitals.
Primary outcome measures:
All cause mortality at 90 days following surgery
Secondary outcome measures:
All cause mortality at 180 days following surgery, duration of hospital stay and hospital re-admission within 180 days of surgery. In eight hospitals EQ-5D 3L will be collected and healthcare resource use data preoperatively, and at 90 and 180 days after surgery to perform a health economics analysis.
In eight hospitals a Health Economics sub-study has been conducted. This involved patients who are already part of the NELA audit. QMUL consented patients and collected information (at 30, 90 and 180 days after surgery) about their quality of life and healthcare use using standardised questionnaires. The information that was recorded on paper questionnaires was entered into a secure, password protected database hosted by Queen Mary University London. No identifiable information was recorded in the database. Each patient in the Health Economics sub-study has a NELA ID which will be used to link with the main NELA dataset and data from ONS and HES. The team will collect EQ-5D 3L (a standardized questionnaire for measuring generic health status and quality of life) and healthcare resource use data preoperatively, and at 90 and 180 days after surgery to perform a health economics analysis which aims to assess whether implementing the quality improvement intervention is likely to be cost-effective on average and whether this varies between low and high mortality groups.
As a national clinical audit funded by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) has been established with the fundamental aim of improving the quality of patient care, and clinical outcomes. The EPOCH trial is an important example of how the data collected by NELA can be used to drive improvements in patient care.
Expected output
The following outputs are planned:
Final Report to Funder - 15th August 2018
Final EPOCH Investigators Meeting - summer 2018
Peer Reviewed Publications - Autumn 2018
Conferences and meetings - 2018 - ongoing
Media – 2018 – ongoing
NELA Website - 2018
Details of expected outputs:
Although the final report will be sent to the funder on 15 August 2018 QMUL will process and analysis the data to produce further papers.
The main scientific report containing only aggregated data with small numbers supressed in line with the HES analysis guide will be sent to the Lancet journal for their consideration first. The Lancet have already published the trial protocol, and have expressed an interest in the work. Second choices would include the British Medical Journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association. These are all general interest journals read by a wide range of healthcare workers worldwide.
QMUL plan to invite all the co-investigators (from 92 hospitals) to a final EPOCH meeting where QMUL will disseminate and discuss the findings.
QMUL will also present the work at scientific meetings, and congresses. For example the ‘Annual Congress of Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Medicine’ and the ‘Peri-Operative Medicine Congress’. QMUL will also disseminate the aggregated findings through the mainstream media (e.g. BBC news, Channel 4 News, Times Newspaper etc.) and also through social media (e.g. Twitter) with the support of QMUL patient representatives. The main target audience will be surgeons, anaesthetists and intensive care doctors but also patients and their carers.
The findings will also be published on the NELA and EPOCH websites. All outputs will aggregated with small numbers supressed in line with the HES analysis guide.
Benefits reported
As data analysis is ongoing, yielded benefits cannot yet be articulated.
Register history
When this agreement appeared in, or was edited in, each monthly edition of the register. Built by comparing every edition this site holds, the earliest of which is July 2021.
-
July 2021 —
already listed in the earliest edition this site holds, so it may be older. 3 versions: DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v2.4, DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v3.3, DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v4.2
-
December 2022
Register-wide edit DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v2.4, DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v3.3, DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y-v4.2 — Datasets: legal basis: “
s261(1) and” taken out. Made to 639 agreements in this edition, so it is reported once, on the changes page, and not counted as an amendment of this agreement.
Cite this page
NHS England (2026) Data Uses Register, September 2026 edition, agreement DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y, “Enhanced Peri-Operative Care for High-risk patients (EPOCH) Trial - Data Linking Request”. Read via NHS Data Access Explorer (unofficial), https://healthdatauses.uk/agreements/dars-nic-55950-y5y2y/ (accessed [date]).
This address stays the same, but the page is rebuilt with each monthly edition, so the citation names the edition it shows. Every edition's data is kept in the facts store.
Source: datausesregister_september2026.xlsx, September 2026 edition of the NHS England Data Uses Register. Search that workbook for DARS-NIC-55950-Y5Y2Y to see the original rows.