DSfC - NHS Portsmouth CCG IV, RS, Comm
NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB · Sub ICB Location
Listed under NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board.
Expired The latest version ended on 16 June 2025. The September 2026 register still lists the agreement, but its term has passed.
- Reference
- DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J
- Latest version
- v6.4
- Term of latest version
- 17 July 2022 to 16 June 2025
- Start date
- Before 5 August 2019
- Data controller
- Sole Data Controller
- Commercial purposes
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Files released to date
- 0
Why the data was released
Objective for processing
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) and Personal Demographic (PDS) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ and PDS data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number and is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Liaison Financial Services Ltd.
Liaison Financial Services Ltd conduct an independent ad-hoc review on retrospective payments made. Investing resource, skills and experience into deeper reconciliation, this identifies overcharges already paid and recovers savings for the CCG that would otherwise be lost.
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models.
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by NHS Berkshire West CCG.
Processing activities
PROCESSING CONDITIONS:
Data must only be used for the purposes stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement. Any additional disclosure / publication will require further approval from NHS Digital.
Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.
Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.
All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their role and the tasks that they are required to undertake.
Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed within this Data Sharing Agreement. Data released will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)
The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply National Opt-outs before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO only for the purpose of Risk Stratification.
CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools.
The identifier available in the data set is the NHS numbers. Any further identification of the patients will only be completed by the patient’s clinician on their own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship.
ONWARD SHARING:
In the development of cohorts of pseudonymised patients considered to be at risk, the data controllers may need the facility to provide identifiable results back to direct health or care professionals for the purpose of direct care. Additionally clinicians, made aware of a number of cases that they believe would need intervention may request re-identification for that direct care purpose. These instances of re-identification will generally be carried out as programmes of work or, rarely, on an individual/small group basis.
NHS Digital provides a re-identification service for this process. All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by NHS Digital on a case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these cases as they are for the purposes of direct care which follows the legal basis of implied consent.
The following are typical examples of instances where a CCG might want to use the re-identification process:
A&E High Attendance usage
The CCG can filter data to show for example the number of A&E attendances in a given period for each patient. The CCG can then flag to the relevant GP of the patient any patients that require intervention. An outcome of this is earlier intervention in the patient(s) care thus potentially reducing future costs and minimising future risk.
Polypharmacy re-IDs
CCGs can request re-ID of a list of patients to be sent to the relevant GP with a high number of medications (ingredient count) and review the medication for these patients. This can help address the risk of polypharmacy which is recognised as an adverse risk factor for patient safety. A by-product of such reviews may be to reduce costs of medication.
The Re-identification process for direct care is as follows:
1. The CCG identifies a patient cohort to be re-identified for the purpose of direct care.
2. The CCG sends a re-id request to the DSCRO. This may be done through the CCG or CSU’s Business Intelligence (BI) Tool, or through a manual form.
3. The DSCRO assesses as to whether the request passes the specified re-identification process checks. Checks include if the requester is authorised to access identifiable data, if the number of patients in the cohort is appropriate, and that the request does not seem inappropriate or outside of expected parameters, including for example around timings and the requestor’s relationship with patients in the data. These checks are carried out either by DSCRO staff using pre-approved information (timing’s, requester’s identity etc) or via an automated system.
4. For automated systems, steps 1 - 3 wouldn’t apply in most cases as it would be the direct care professional who identifies the cohort and as long as they are an approved re-id user and have gone through security checks initially, they will be able to re-id without further checks.
5. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or Care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record.
6. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests
Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
SEGREGATION:
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital.
Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors.
Data Minimisation
Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied -
For the purpose of Commissioning:
• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Portsmouth CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner).
and/or
• Patients treated by a provider where NHS Portsmouth CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.
and/or
• Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Portsmouth CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.
and/or
• Patients treated by a provider where NHS Portsmouth CCG has joint responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for Ambulance Trust data
For the purpose of Risk Stratification:
• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within NHS Portsmouth CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner
For the purpose of Invoice Validation:
• CCG of residence and/or registration.
Microsoft Limited provide Cloud Services for NHS North of England Commissioning Support Unit, North East London Commissioning Support Unit, South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Liaison Financial Services Ltd and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
Pulsant, IT Professional Services Ltd, Interxion, Ark Data Centres and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
ANS Group Limited will be assisting in the set up and management of the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit Microsoft Azure Cloud and are therefore listed as a data processor. They will not have any additional processing / storage addresses (as these will be the Microsoft Azure addresses). Using the data for any other purpose would be considered a breach of this agreement
Invoice Validation
South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
1. Identifiable SUS+ and PDS Data is obtained from the SUS+ and PDS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ and PDS data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit.
3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider.
4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes:
a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and PDS and/or provider backing flow data.
b. Once the provider backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs
ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area.
iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.
5. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit CEfF team and the provider, meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc.
Liaison Financial Services Ltd
1. Identifiable SUS+ Data is obtained from the SUS+ Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the Liaison Financial Services Ltd.
3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider.
4. Liaison Financial Services Ltd carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes:
a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and/or provider backing flow data.
b. Once the provider backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs
ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area.
iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.
4. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between Liaison Financial Services Ltd CEfF team and the provider, meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc.
Risk Stratification
1. Identifiable SUS data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, who hold the SUS data within the secure Data Centre.
3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit.
4. SUS data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
6. Once South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level.
Commissioning
The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:
1. SUS+
2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers)
a. Acute
b. Ambulance
c. Community
d. Demand for Service
e. Diagnostic Service
f. Emergency Care
g. Experience, Quality and Outcomes
h. Mental Health
i. Other Not Elsewhere Classified
j. Population Data
k. Primary Care Services
l. Public Health Screening
Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows:
Data Processor – NHS Berkshire West CCG
1) Pseudonymised SUS data is securely transferred from the DSCRO to NHS Berkshire West CCG.
2) The DSCRO will receive and process Local Provider data for the London providers and disseminate the pseudonymised data to NHS Berkshire West CCG via the NEL / NOE / SCW CSU.
3) Data will be pseudonymised in such a way as to allow linkage between data in points (1) and (2) above.
4) NHS Berkshire West CCG add derived fields, link SUS fields and provide analysis to:
o See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning (CCG).
o Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers (CCG).
o Undertake population health management
o Undertake data quality and validation checks
o Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population
o Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk
o Conduct Health Needs Assessments
5) Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within points (1) and (2) above.
6) NHS Berkshire West CCG then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.
7) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by NHS Berkshire West CCG or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
8) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.
Expected output
Invoice Validation
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
5. Support validating financial payments for contracted and non-contracted activity, determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
Invoice Validation- Liaison Financial Services Ltd
1. Validation of Continuing Healthcare related invoices and payments
2. Independent Identification of potential overpayments made by the CCG through invoice validation
3. Liaising with providers with a view to recouping these monies
4. Review is completed for the retrospective period from date of contract with Liaison Financial Services back to 01/04/2013.
5. Reviews take 3-9 months depending on number of claims to investigate and resolve
6. Liaison Financial Services would repeat the exercise 2-3 years later
7. CCGs could request reviews to be done more frequently
8. SUS+ would only be requested each time a review was completed, and could be requested at different times as independent reviews
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
CCGs will be able to:
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
COMMISSIONING
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o High cost activity uses (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
19. Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand.
20. Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters.
21. Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals.
22. Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population
23. Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population
24. Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline.
25. Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts.
26. Identify medication prescribing trends and their effectiveness.
27. Linking prescribing habits to entry points into the health and social care system.
28. Identify, quantify and understand cohorts of patient’s high numbers of different medications (polypharmacy).
29. Monitoring, at a population level, particular cohorts of service users and designing analytical models which support more effective interventions in health and adult social care
30. Monitoring service and integrated care outcomes across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care
Expected measurable benefits
Invoice Validation
The invoice validation process supports the ongoing delivery of patient care across the NHS and the CCG region by:
1. Ensuring that activity is fully financially validated.
2. Ensuring that service providers are accurately paid for the patients treatment.
3. Enabling services to be planned, commissioned, managed, and subjected to financial control.
4. Enabling commissioners to confirm that they are paying appropriately for treatment of patients for whom they are responsible.
5. Fulfilling commissioners duties to fiscal probity and scrutiny.
6. Ensuring full financial accountability for relevant organisations.
7. Ensuring robust commissioning and performance management.
8. Ensuring commissioning objectives do not compromise patient confidentiality.
9. Ensuring the avoidance of misappropriation of public funds.
INVOICE VALIDATION – Liaison Financial Services Ltd
1. Financial validation of activity
2. CCG Budget control
3. Assurances over the robustness of internal control mechanisms relating to the payment of invoices and/or suggested improvements
4. Identification and recovery of monies which would otherwise be lost
5. Meeting commissioning objectives without compromising patient confidentiality
6. The avoidance of misappropriation of public funds to ensure the ongoing delivery of patient care
7. Benefit delivered 3-9 months from receiving data, depending on number of claims to investigate and resolve
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:
1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
2. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services thus allowing early intervention.
3. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
4. Supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework by allowing for more targeted intervention in primary care.
5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and healthcare outcomes
All of the above lead to improved patient experience and health outcomes through more effective commissioning of services.
Commissioning
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts
13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed.
15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice.
16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region.
17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years.
18. Allow reporting to drive changes and improve the quality of commissioned services and health outcomes for people.
19. Assists commissioners to make better decisions to support patients and drive changes in health care
20. Allows comparisons of providers performance to assist improvement in services – increase the quality
21. Allow analysis of health care provision to be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
22. To evaluate the impact of new services and innovations (e.g. if commissioners implement a new service or type of procedure with a provider, they can evaluate whether it improves outcomes for patients compared to the previous one).
23. Monitoring of entire population, as opposed to only those that engage with services
24. Enable Commissioners to be able to see early indications of potential practice resilience issues in that an early warning marker can often be a trend of patients re-registering themselves at a neighbouring practice.
25. Monitor the quality and safety of the delivery of healthcare services.
26. Allow focused commissioning support based on factual data rather than assumed and projected sources
27. Understand admissions linked to overprescribing.
28. Add value to the population health management workstream by adding prescribing data into linked dataset for segmentation and stratification.
29. Developing, through evaluation of person-level data, more effective prevention strategies and interventions across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care
30. Designing and implementing new payment models across health and adult social care
31. Understanding current and future population needs and resource utilisation for local strategic planning and commissioning purposes including for health, social care and public health needs.
Benefits reported so far
The CCG has produced and annual report which outlines the key developments and achievements for which processing of NHS Digital data has supported. The annual report can be found at:
https://www.portsmouthccg.nhs.uk/publications-and-key-documents/
Datasets on the latest version
Legal basis for provision: Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'; Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'.
| Dataset | Type of data | Sensitivity | Frequency | Confidential data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Ambulance-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Community-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Mental Health-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Personal Demographic Service | Identifiable | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Population Data-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| SUS for Commissioners | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
| SUS for Commissioners | Identifiable | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
Files released
Files released counts only files released externally by DARS. Access granted in NHS England's own systems, such as its Secure Data Environment, is not included.
No files recorded as released under this agreement.
Version history
The register lists each renewal of this agreement as a separate row. This site has 5 versions — earlier versions existed before this site's records begin.
DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v6.4 17 July 2022 to 16 June 2025
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Portsmouth CCG IV, RS, Comm
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 15
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Personal Demographic Service; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v5.3
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2022-07-17 | |
| End date | 2025-06-16 |
Objective for processing
[40 paragraphs unchanged]
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by
Optum Health Solutions and
NHS
North and East London Commissioning Support Unit.
Berkshire West CCG.
Processing activities
PROCESSING CONDITIONS:
[3 paragraphs unchanged]
All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their
role.
role and the tasks that they are required to undertake.
Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed
[16 words unchanged]
will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement.
The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need
[32 words unchanged]
and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that
data).
data)
[3 paragraphs unchanged]
Onward Sharing
ONWARD SHARING:
There is no requirement for the analytical teams to re-identify patients, but in
In
the development of cohorts of
pseudonymised
patients considered to be at risk, the data controllers may need the facility to provide identifiable results back to direct
healthcare
health or care
professionals
or local authority direct care staff only
for the purpose of direct care.
All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by the DSCRO on
Additionally clinicians, made aware of
a
case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these
number of
cases
as
that
they
are
believe would need intervention may request re-identification
for
the purposes of
that
direct care
which follows the legal basis
purpose. These instances
of
implied consent.
re-identification will generally be carried out as programmes of work or, rarely, on an individual/small group basis.
An example of a request for the re-id of patients for direct care may be;
NHS Digital provides a re-identification service for this process. All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by NHS Digital on a case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these cases as they are for the purposes of direct care which follows the legal basis of implied consent.
The following are typical examples of instances where a CCG might want to use the re-identification process:
[3 paragraphs unchanged]
CCG's
CCGs
can request re-ID of a list of patients to be sent to
[37 words unchanged]
A by-product of such reviews may be to reduce costs of medication.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
1. The CCG identifies a patient cohort
(typically small numbers)
to be re-identified for the purpose of direct care.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
3. The DSCRO
(either through an automated system or manual checking in line with the request)
assesses as to whether the request passes the specified re-identification process checks.
[35 words unchanged]
for example around timings and the requestor’s relationship with patients in the
data
data. These checks are carried out either by DSCRO staff using pre-approved information (timing’s, requester’s identity etc) or via an automated system.
4. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record.
4. For automated systems, steps 1 - 3 wouldn’t apply in most cases as it would be the direct care professional who identifies the cohort and as long as they are an approved re-id user and have gone through security checks initially, they will be able to re-id without further checks.
5. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests
5. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or Care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record.
6. National Data opt outs are not applied for the purpose of direct care
6. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests
Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
Segregation
SEGREGATION:
[1 paragraph unchanged]
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
[10 paragraphs unchanged]
and/or
• Patients treated by a provider where NHS Portsmouth CCG has joint responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for Ambulance Trust data
[4 paragraphs unchanged]
Microsoft Limited
supply
provide
Cloud
services
Services
for
NEL CSU, SCW CSU
NHS North of England Commissioning Support Unit, North East London Commissioning Support Unit, South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
and Liaison Financial Services Ltd and are therefore listed as a data
[29 words unchanged]
agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
ANS Group Limited will be assisting in the set up and management of the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit Microsoft Azure Cloud and are therefore listed as a data processor. They will not have any additional processing / storage addresses (as these will be the Microsoft Azure addresses). Using the data for any other purpose would be considered a breach of this agreement.
Pulsant, IT Professional Services Ltd, Interxion, Ark Data Centres and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
ANS Group Limited will be assisting in the set up and management of the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit Microsoft Azure Cloud and are therefore listed as a data processor. They will not have any additional processing / storage addresses (as these will be the Microsoft Azure addresses). Using the data for any other purpose would be considered a breach of this agreement
Interxion and Ark Data Centres do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
[45 paragraphs unchanged]
Data Processor - Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd & NHS North and East London CSU
Data Processor – NHS Berkshire West CCG
1) Pseudonymised SUS data is securely transferred from
SCW
the
DSCRO to
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd.
NHS Berkshire West CCG.
2)
NEL
The
DSCRO will receive and process Local Provider data for the London providers and disseminate the pseudonymised data to
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd
NHS Berkshire West CCG
via the NEL
CSU SFTP process.
/ NOE / SCW CSU.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
4)
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd
NHS Berkshire West CCG
add derived fields, link SUS fields and provide analysis to:
[8 paragraphs unchanged]
6)
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd
NHS Berkshire West CCG
then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.
7) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd
NHS Berkshire West CCG
or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
Expected output
[86 paragraphs unchanged] 29. Monitoring, at a population level, particular cohorts of service users and designing analytical models which support more effective interventions in health and adult social care 30. Monitoring service and integrated care outcomes across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care
Expected measurable benefits
[72 paragraphs unchanged] 29. Developing, through evaluation of person-level data, more effective prevention strategies and interventions across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care 30. Designing and implementing new payment models across health and adult social care 31. Understanding current and future population needs and resource utilisation for local strategic planning and commissioning purposes including for health, social care and public health needs.
Benefits reported
The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the provided data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs.
The CCG has produced and annual report which outlines the key developments and achievements for which processing of NHS Digital data has supported. The annual report can be found at:
Listed below is a number of further yielded benefits for commissioning;
https://www.portsmouthccg.nhs.uk/publications-and-key-documents/
1. Monitoring In year projects
2. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients
3. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
4. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
5. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
The CCG will look to build on the yielded benefits of commissioning services that meet the needs of their local population, and that are effective in their delivery. The CCG will use intelligence to add insight to strategic commissioning and service integration across the CCG Area. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population within the CCG Area.
The continued access to this data will enable the CCG to further understand and improve service performance and delivery, including patient pathway design, re-design and patient experience.
DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v5.3 17 August 2021 to 16 August 2024
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Portsmouth CCG IV, RS, Comm
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 15
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Personal Demographic Service; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v4.2
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2021-08-17 | |
| End date | 2024-08-16 | |
| Acute-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Ambulance-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Community-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Mental Health-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Population Data-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information' | |
| SUS for Commissioners: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'; Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'. |
Datasets: + Personal Demographic Service
Objective for processing
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG
[14 words unchanged]
responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+)
and Personal Demographic (PDS)
data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+
and PDS
data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number
and
is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and
will not be used further.
determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
[28 paragraphs unchanged]
• Using value as the redesign principle
[7 paragraphs unchanged]
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk
[15 words unchanged]
algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery
models
models.
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
Processing activities
[5 paragraphs unchanged]
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need
[32 words unchanged]
and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that
data)
data).
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
(RS)
The
only
identifier available in the data set is the NHS numbers. Any further
[14 words unchanged]
own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
There is no requirement for the analytical teams to re-identify patients, but in the development of cohorts of patients considered to be at risk, the data controllers may need the facility to provide identifiable results back to direct healthcare professionals or local authority direct care staff only for the purpose of direct care. All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by the DSCRO on a case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these cases as they are for the purposes of direct care which follows the legal basis of implied consent.
An example of a request for the re-id of patients for direct care may be;
A&E High Attendance usage
The CCG can filter data to show for example the number of A&E attendances in a given period for each patient. The CCG can then flag to the relevant GP of the patient any patients that require intervention. An outcome of this is earlier intervention in the patient(s) care thus potentially reducing future costs and minimising future risk.
Polypharmacy re-IDs
CCG's can request re-ID of a list of patients to be sent to the relevant GP with a high number of medications (ingredient count) and review the medication for these patients. This can help address the risk of polypharmacy which is recognised as an adverse risk factor for patient safety. A by-product of such reviews may be to reduce costs of medication.
The Re-identification process for direct care is as follows:
1. The CCG identifies a patient cohort (typically small numbers) to be re-identified for the purpose of direct care.
2. The CCG sends a re-id request to the DSCRO. This may be done through the CCG or CSU’s Business Intelligence (BI) Tool, or through a manual form.
3. The DSCRO (either through an automated system or manual checking in line with the request) assesses as to whether the request passes the specified re-identification process checks. Checks include if the requester is authorised to access identifiable data, if the number of patients in the cohort is appropriate, and that the request does not seem inappropriate or outside of expected parameters, including for example around timings and the requestor’s relationship with patients in the data
4. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record.
5. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests
6. National Data opt outs are not applied for the purpose of direct care
[23 paragraphs unchanged]
1. Identifiable SUS+
and PDS
Data is obtained from the SUS+
and PDS
Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+
and PDS
data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit.
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+
and PDS
and/or provider backing flow data.
[56 paragraphs unchanged]
Expected output
[7 paragraphs unchanged]
5. Support validating financial payments for contracted and non-contracted activity, determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
[47 paragraphs unchanged]
8. GP Practice level dashboard
reports
reports.
[20 paragraphs unchanged]
19. Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand.
20. Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters.
21. Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals.
22. Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population
23. Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population
24. Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline.
25. Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts.
26. Identify medication prescribing trends and their effectiveness.
27. Linking prescribing habits to entry points into the health and social care system.
28. Identify, quantify and understand cohorts of patient’s high numbers of different medications (polypharmacy).
Expected measurable benefits
[26 paragraphs unchanged] All of the above lead to improved patient experience and health outcomes through more effective commissioning of services. [34 paragraphs unchanged] 18. Allow reporting to drive changes and improve the quality of commissioned services and health outcomes for people. 19. Assists commissioners to make better decisions to support patients and drive changes in health care 20. Allows comparisons of providers performance to assist improvement in services – increase the quality 21. Allow analysis of health care provision to be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. 22. To evaluate the impact of new services and innovations (e.g. if commissioners implement a new service or type of procedure with a provider, they can evaluate whether it improves outcomes for patients compared to the previous one). 23. Monitoring of entire population, as opposed to only those that engage with services 24. Enable Commissioners to be able to see early indications of potential practice resilience issues in that an early warning marker can often be a trend of patients re-registering themselves at a neighbouring practice. 25. Monitor the quality and safety of the delivery of healthcare services. 26. Allow focused commissioning support based on factual data rather than assumed and projected sources 27. Understand admissions linked to overprescribing. 28. Add value to the population health management workstream by adding prescribing data into linked dataset for segmentation and stratification.
Benefits reported
Not stated in the previous version; added here.
The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the provided data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs.
Listed below is a number of further yielded benefits for commissioning;
1. Monitoring In year projects
2. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients
3. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
4. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
5. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
The CCG will look to build on the yielded benefits of commissioning services that meet the needs of their local population, and that are effective in their delivery. The CCG will use intelligence to add insight to strategic commissioning and service integration across the CCG Area. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population within the CCG Area.
The continued access to this data will enable the CCG to further understand and improve service performance and delivery, including patient pathway design, re-design and patient experience.
Objective for processing
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) and Personal Demographic (PDS) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ and PDS data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number and is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Liaison Financial Services Ltd.
Liaison Financial Services Ltd conduct an independent ad-hoc review on retrospective payments made. Investing resource, skills and experience into deeper reconciliation, this identifies overcharges already paid and recovers savings for the CCG that would otherwise be lost.
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models.
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by Optum Health Solutions and NHS North and East London Commissioning Support Unit.
Expected output
Invoice Validation
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
5. Support validating financial payments for contracted and non-contracted activity, determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
Invoice Validation- Liaison Financial Services Ltd
1. Validation of Continuing Healthcare related invoices and payments
2. Independent Identification of potential overpayments made by the CCG through invoice validation
3. Liaising with providers with a view to recouping these monies
4. Review is completed for the retrospective period from date of contract with Liaison Financial Services back to 01/04/2013.
5. Reviews take 3-9 months depending on number of claims to investigate and resolve
6. Liaison Financial Services would repeat the exercise 2-3 years later
7. CCGs could request reviews to be done more frequently
8. SUS+ would only be requested each time a review was completed, and could be requested at different times as independent reviews
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
CCGs will be able to:
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
COMMISSIONING
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o High cost activity uses (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
19. Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand.
20. Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters.
21. Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals.
22. Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population
23. Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population
24. Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline.
25. Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts.
26. Identify medication prescribing trends and their effectiveness.
27. Linking prescribing habits to entry points into the health and social care system.
28. Identify, quantify and understand cohorts of patient’s high numbers of different medications (polypharmacy).
Benefits reported
The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the provided data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs.
Listed below is a number of further yielded benefits for commissioning;
1. Monitoring In year projects
2. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients
3. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
4. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
5. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
The CCG will look to build on the yielded benefits of commissioning services that meet the needs of their local population, and that are effective in their delivery. The CCG will use intelligence to add insight to strategic commissioning and service integration across the CCG Area. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population within the CCG Area.
The continued access to this data will enable the CCG to further understand and improve service performance and delivery, including patient pathway design, re-design and patient experience.
DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v4.2 28 August 2020 to 27 August 2023
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Portsmouth CCG IV, RS, Comm
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 14
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v3.2
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2020-08-28 | |
| End date | 2023-08-27 |
Objective for processing
[4 paragraphs unchanged] Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Liaison Financial Services Ltd. Liaison Financial Services Ltd conduct an independent ad-hoc review on retrospective payments made. Investing resource, skills and experience into deeper reconciliation, this identifies overcharges already paid and recovers savings for the CCG that would otherwise be lost. [37 paragraphs unchanged]
Processing activities
[28 paragraphs unchanged] Microsoft Limited supply Cloud services for NEL CSU, SCW CSU and Liaison Financial Services Ltd and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to [24 words unchanged] agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. ANS Group Limited will be assisting in the set up and management of the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit Microsoft Azure Cloud and are therefore listed as a data processor. They will not have any additional processing / storage addresses (as these will be the Microsoft Azure addresses). Using the data for any other purpose would be considered a breach of this agreement. [13 paragraphs unchanged] Liaison Financial Services Ltd 1. Identifiable SUS+ Data is obtained from the SUS+ Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the Liaison Financial Services Ltd. 3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider. 4. Liaison Financial Services Ltd carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes: a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and/or provider backing flow data. b. Once the provider backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are: i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area. iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance. 4. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between Liaison Financial Services Ltd CEfF team and the provider, meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc. [40 paragraphs unchanged]
Expected output
[7 paragraphs unchanged]
Invoice Validation- Liaison Financial Services Ltd
1. Validation of Continuing Healthcare related invoices and payments
2. Independent Identification of potential overpayments made by the CCG through invoice validation
3. Liaising with providers with a view to recouping these monies
4. Review is completed for the retrospective period from date of contract with Liaison Financial Services back to 01/04/2013.
5. Reviews take 3-9 months depending on number of claims to investigate and resolve
6. Liaison Financial Services would repeat the exercise 2-3 years later
7. CCGs could request reviews to be done more frequently
8. SUS+ would only be requested each time a review was completed, and could be requested at different times as independent reviews
[38 paragraphs unchanged]
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports
include high flyers.
[5 paragraphs unchanged]
o
Most expensive patients
High cost activity uses
(top 15%)
[14 paragraphs unchanged]
Expected measurable benefits
[11 paragraphs unchanged] INVOICE VALIDATION – Liaison Financial Services Ltd 1. Financial validation of activity 2. CCG Budget control 3. Assurances over the robustness of internal control mechanisms relating to the payment of invoices and/or suggested improvements 4. Identification and recovery of monies which would otherwise be lost 5. Meeting commissioning objectives without compromising patient confidentiality 6. The avoidance of misappropriation of public funds to ensure the ongoing delivery of patient care 7. Benefit delivered 3-9 months from receiving data, depending on number of claims to investigate and resolve [42 paragraphs unchanged]
Applicant organisation: renamed from NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB to NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB. The same organisation under a new name, so not counted as a change.
Objective for processing
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.
The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Liaison Financial Services Ltd.
Liaison Financial Services Ltd conduct an independent ad-hoc review on retrospective payments made. Investing resource, skills and experience into deeper reconciliation, this identifies overcharges already paid and recovers savings for the CCG that would otherwise be lost.
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by Optum Health Solutions and NHS North and East London Commissioning Support Unit.
Expected output
Invoice Validation
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
Invoice Validation- Liaison Financial Services Ltd
1. Validation of Continuing Healthcare related invoices and payments
2. Independent Identification of potential overpayments made by the CCG through invoice validation
3. Liaising with providers with a view to recouping these monies
4. Review is completed for the retrospective period from date of contract with Liaison Financial Services back to 01/04/2013.
5. Reviews take 3-9 months depending on number of claims to investigate and resolve
6. Liaison Financial Services would repeat the exercise 2-3 years later
7. CCGs could request reviews to be done more frequently
8. SUS+ would only be requested each time a review was completed, and could be requested at different times as independent reviews
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
CCGs will be able to:
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o High cost activity uses (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v3.2 1 June 2020 to 31 May 2023
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Portsmouth CCG IV, RS, Comm
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 14
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v2.5
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2020-06-01 | |
| End date | 2023-05-31 |
Objective for processing
[41 paragraphs unchanged] Processing for commissioning will be conducted by Optum Health Solutions and NHS North and East London Commissioning Support Unit.
Processing activities
[28 paragraphs unchanged]
Microsoft Limited supply Cloud services for NEL CSU and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
Interxion and Ark Data Centres do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
[35 paragraphs unchanged]
Data Processor - Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd
& NHS North and East London CSU
1) Pseudonymised SUS
and Local Provider Data only
data
is securely transferred from
the
SCW
DSCRO to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd.
2) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd add derived fields, link SUS fields and provide analysis to:
2) NEL DSCRO will receive and process Local Provider data for the London providers and disseminate the pseudonymised data to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd via the NEL CSU SFTP process.
3) Data will be pseudonymised in such a way as to allow linkage between data in points (1) and (2) above.
4) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd add derived fields, link SUS fields and provide analysis to:
[7 paragraphs unchanged]
3)
5)
Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within
point 1.
points (1) and (2) above.
4)
6)
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.
5)
7)
Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6)
8)
Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and
[22 words unchanged]
Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.
Expected output
[60 paragraphs unchanged] 13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services. 14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die. 15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support. 16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust. 17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports. 18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
Expected measurable benefits
[49 paragraphs unchanged] 14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed. 15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice. 16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region. 17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years.
Objective for processing
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.
The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by Optum Health Solutions and NHS North and East London Commissioning Support Unit.
Expected output
Invoice Validation
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
CCGs will be able to:
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v2.5 5 August 2019 to 4 August 2022
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Portsmouth CCG IV, RS, Comm
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 14
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
Objective for processing
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.
The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by Optum Health Solutions
Expected output
Invoice Validation
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
CCGs will be able to:
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
Register history
When this agreement appeared in, or was edited in, each monthly edition of the register. Built by comparing every edition this site holds, the earliest of which is July 2021.
-
July 2021 —
already listed in the earliest edition this site holds, so it may be older. 3 versions: DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v2.5, DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v3.2, DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v4.2
-
September 2021
Amended DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v4.2
- Applicant organisation:
NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG→ NHS PORTSMOUTH CCG
- Applicant organisation:
-
November 2021
1 version added: DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v5.3
-
July 2022
1 version added: DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v6.4
-
October 2022
Succeeded Applicant organisation: NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG succeeded by NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.Succeeded Data controllers: NHS Portsmouth CCG succeeded by NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.Succeeded Applicant organisation: NHS Portsmouth CCG succeeded by NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.
-
December 2022
Register-wide edit DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v2.5, DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v3.2, DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J-v4.2 — Datasets: legal basis: “
s261(1) and” taken out. Made to 639 agreements in this edition, so it is reported once, on the changes page, and not counted as an amendment of this agreement.
"Amended in place" means NHS England changed the record without issuing a new version number. The register publishes no changelog for those edits; this site infers them by comparing editions. An edit is attributed to the edition it first appears in, not to the date it was made.
Cite this page
NHS England (2026) Data Uses Register, September 2026 edition, agreement DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J, “DSfC - NHS Portsmouth CCG IV, RS, Comm”. Read via NHS Data Access Explorer (unofficial), https://healthdatauses.uk/agreements/dars-nic-54764-n1c1j/ (accessed [date]).
This address stays the same, but the page is rebuilt with each monthly edition, so the citation names the edition it shows. Every edition's data is kept in the facts store.
Source: datausesregister_september2026.xlsx, September 2026 edition of the NHS England Data Uses Register. Search that workbook for DARS-NIC-54764-N1C1J to see the original rows.