DSfC- NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wright CCG and NHS Portsmouth CCG- COMM
NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB · Sub ICB Location
Listed under NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board.
Expired The latest version ended on 5 October 2024. The September 2026 register still lists the agreement, but its term has passed.
- Reference
- DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V
- Latest version
- v2.2
- Term of latest version
- 6 October 2021 to 5 October 2024
- Start date
- 1 April 2021
- Data controller
- Joint Data Controller
- Commercial purposes
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Files released to date
- 0
Data controllers
- NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB (named in the register 2 times, as different sub-ICB locations)
Why the data was released
Objective for processing
COMMISSIONING
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight cohorts of patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by North of England Commissioning Support Unit, Cerner Limited and Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd provide analysis such as -
• Whole population segmentation to assess population health needs
• Prospective risk scoring for individuals to indicate the likelihood of future adverse events
• Predictive modelling to determine individuals at risk and an understanding of the drivers of risk
• Longitudinal analysis of intersegmental drift - identifying individuals who move between complexity classifications and the drivers of these transitions
• The production of individual-level theographs to identify gaps in care
• Actuarial modelling to understand unmitigated and mitigated system-level activity and cost historically and in the future
Cerner will also provide analytics to the CCGs, enabling CCG analysts direct access to the data in the data warehouse.
Processing activities
PROCESSING CONDITIONS:
Data must only be used for the purposes stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement. Any additional disclosure / publication will require further approval from NHS Digital.
Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.
Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.
All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their role and the tasks that they are required to undertake.
Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed within this Data Sharing Agreement. Data released will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)
ONWARD SHARING:
There is no requirement for the analytical teams to re-identify patients, but in the development of cohorts of patients considered to be at risk, the data controllers may need the facility to provide identifiable results back to direct healthcare professionals or local authority direct care staff only for the purpose of direct care. All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by the DSCRO on a case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these cases as they are for the purposes of direct care which follows the legal basis of implied consent.
An example of a request for the re-id of patients for direct care may be;
A&E High Attendance usage
The CCG can filter data to show for example the number of A&E attendances in a given period for each patient. The CCG can then flag to the relevant GP of the patient any patients that require intervention. An outcome of this is earlier intervention in the patient(s) care thus potentially reducing future costs and minimising future risk.
Polypharmacy re-IDs
CCG's can request re-ID of a list of patients to be sent to the relevant GP with a high number of medications (ingredient count) and review the medication for these patients. This can help address the risk of polypharmacy which is recognised as an adverse risk factor for patient safety. A by-product of such reviews may be to reduce costs of medication.
The Re-identification process for direct care is as follows:
1. The CCG identifies a patient cohort (typically small numbers) to be re-identified for the purpose of direct care.
2. The CCG sends a re-id request to the DSCRO. This may be done through the CCG or CSU’s Business Intelligence (BI) Tool, or through a manual form.
3. The DSCRO (either through an automated system or manual checking in line with the request) assesses as to whether the request passes the specified re-identification process checks. Checks include if the requester is authorised to access identifiable data, if the number of patients in the cohort is appropriate, and that the request does not seem inappropriate or outside of expected parameters, including for example around timings and the requestor’s relationship with patients in the data
4. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record.
5. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests
6. National Data opt outs are not applied for the purpose of direct care
Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
SEGREGATION:
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital.
DATA MINIMISATION:
Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied -
For the purpose of Commissioning:
• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG or NHS Portsmouth CCG regions (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner).
and/or
• Patients treated by a provider where NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG or NHS Portsmouth CCG are the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.
and/or
• Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG or NHS Portsmouth CCG- this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.
This includes data that was previously under a different organisation name but has now merged into this CCG.
Amazon Web Services provide Cloud Services for Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited and Cerner Limited and are therefore listed as data processors. They supply support to the system, but do not access data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
Microsoft Limited provide Cloud Services for NHS North of England Commissioning Support Unit and Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited and are therefore listed as data processors. They supply support to the system but do not access data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
Pulsant and IT Professional Services Ltd and Equinix (UK) Ltd do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
COMMISSIONING
The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:
1. SUS+
2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers)
a. Acute
b. Ambulance
c. Community
d. Demand for Service
e. Diagnostic Service
f. Emergency Care
g. Experience, Quality and Outcomes
h. Mental Health
i. Other Not Elsewhere Classified
j. Population Data
k. Primary Care Services
l. Public Health Screening
3. Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
4. Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows:
Data Processor 1 - North of England Commissioning Support Unit
1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health Services Data set and Community Services Data Set (CSDS) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to North of England Commissioning Support Unit.
2. North of England Commissioning Support Unit also receives GP and Social Care Data (see points I to ix)
3. North of England Commissioning Support Unit add derived fields by using existing data, link data and provide analysis to:
a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers.
c. Undertake population health management
d. Undertake data quality and validation checks
e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population
f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk
g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments
4. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1 and 2.
5. North of England Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to Optum Health Solutions UK Limited and/or the CCGs.
North of England Commissioning Support Unit have individual data processing agreements in place with GPs, Local Authorities and the CCGs, to pseudonymise data. Acting on their behalf, North of England Commissioning Support Unit pseudonymises the data as follows:
i. Identifiable GP and Social Care data is submitted to North of England Commissioning Support Unit.
ii. The data lands in a ring-fenced area.
iii. North of England Commissioning Support Unit has access to a pseudonymisation tool. North of England Commissioning Support Unit requests an organisation specific pseudonymisation key from the DSCRO. The key can only be used once. The key is specific to the individual request and the organisation it is being requested for.
iv. The data is then pseudonymised using the organisation specific pseudonymisation tool and DSCRO issued key. The identifiable data is then deleted from the ring-fenced area.
Data Processor 2 - Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - for the NHS England Wave 3 PHM Project
1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Mental Health Services Data Set, Community Services Data Set, Local Flow Provider Data, GP Primary Care data and Social Care data is securely transferred from NHS North of England Commissioning Support Unit to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd.
2. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd provide analysis to:
o Whole population segmentation to assess population health needs
o Prospective risk scoring for individuals to indicate the likelihood of future adverse events
o Predictive modelling to determine individuals at risk and an understanding of the drivers of risk
o Longitudinal analysis of intersegmental drift - identifying individuals who move between complexity classifications and the drivers of these transitions
o The production of individual-level theographs to identify gaps in care
3. Allowed linkage is between the datasets contained within point (1) above. GP and Social Care datasets are needed for the processing carried out by Optum to enhance the population health analytics beyond SUS+ and LPF's which contain only secondary care activity
4. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to Cerner Limited and the CCG.
5. Aggregated of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for the purpose of the NHS England Wave 3 PHM project will be destroyed within 6 months of the completion of the project and permissions as a data processor for this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment.
Data Processor 3 - Cerner Limited - PHM Analytics
1. Cerner Limited receives the processed, pseudonymised and linked data and SUS+, Mental Health Services Data Set, Community Services Data Set, Local Flow Provider Data, GP Primary Care data and Social Care data from Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited as instructed by the CCG.
2. Cerner Limited loads the data onto a secure area of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight database that is hosted by Cerner Limited.
3. Cerner have access to the data to develop analytics outputs.
4. Analysts employed by NHS Hampshire, Southampton and the Isle of Wright CCG and NHS Portsmouth CCG are given direct access to the linked PHM data and analytics held by Cerner.
5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Cerner Limited or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
Expected output
COMMISSIONING
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13.Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14.Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15.Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16.Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17.Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18.Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
19.Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand.
20.Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters.
21.Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals.
22.Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population
23.Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population
24.Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline.
25.Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts.
Expected measurable benefits
COMMISSIONING
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts
13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed.
15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice.
16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region.
17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years.
18.Allow reporting to drive changes and improve the quality of commissioned services and health outcomes for people.
19. Assists commissioners to make better decisions to support patients and drive changes in health care
20.Allows comparisons of providers performance to assist improvement in services – increase the quality
21.Allow analysis of health care provision to be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
22.To evaluate the impact of new services and innovations (e.g. if commissioners implement a new service or type of procedure with a provider, they can evaluate whether it improves outcomes for patients compared to the previous one).
23.Monitoring of entire population, as opposed to only those that engage with services
24.Enable Commissioners to be able to see early indications of potential practice resilience issues in that an early warning marker can often be a trend of patients re-registering themselves at a neighbouring practice.
25.Monitor the quality and safety of the delivery of healthcare services.
26.Allow focused commissioning support based on factual data rather than assumed and projected sources
Benefits reported so far
The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the provided data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs.
Listed below is a number of further yielded benefits for commissioning;
1. Monitoring In year projects
2. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients
3. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
4. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
5. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
The CCG will look to build on the yielded benefits of commissioning services that meet the needs of their local population, and that are effective in their delivery. The CCG will use intelligence to add insight to strategic commissioning and service integration across the CCG Area. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population within the CCG Area.
Benefits to date are in line with what the CCG expected to achieve at the point in time as described in the previous application. The continued access to this data will enable the CCG to further understand and improve service performance and delivery, including patient pathway design, re-design and patient experience.
The CCGs has recently published their annual report for 2020/21:
NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wright CCG - https://www.hampshiresouthamptonandisleofwightccg.nhs.uk/aboutus/publications-corp-docs/annual-reports-and-accounts-1
NHS Portsmouth CCG - https://www.portsmouthccg.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Portsmouth-CCG-Annual-Report-and-Accounts-20-21.pdf
These reports highlights the achievements made during the year, of which some would only have been achieved by using the data from NHS Digital.
Further information about other achievements and future priorities can be found within the reports.
Datasets on the latest version
Legal basis for provision: Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
| Dataset | Type of data | Sensitivity | Frequency | Confidential data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Ambulance-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Community Services Data Set (CSDS) | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Community-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Mental Health-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Population Data-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
| SUS for Commissioners | Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Does not include the flow of confidential data |
Files released
Files released counts only files released externally by DARS. Access granted in NHS England's own systems, such as its Secure Data Environment, is not included.
No files recorded as released under this agreement.
Version history
The register lists each renewal of this agreement as a separate row. This site has 3 versions.
DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v2.2 6 October 2021 to 5 October 2024
- Title
- DSfC- NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wright CCG and NHS Portsmouth CCG- COMM
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 15
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v1.2
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2021-10-06 | |
| End date | 2024-10-05 |
Objective for processing
[24 paragraphs unchanged]
• Using value as the redesign principle
[18 paragraphs unchanged]
Processing activities
[8 paragraphs unchanged]
Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.
There is no requirement for the analytical teams to re-identify patients, but in the development of cohorts of patients considered to be at risk, the data controllers may need the facility to provide identifiable results back to direct healthcare professionals or local authority direct care staff only for the purpose of direct care. All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by the DSCRO on a case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these cases as they are for the purposes of direct care which follows the legal basis of implied consent.
An example of a request for the re-id of patients for direct care may be;
A&E High Attendance usage
The CCG can filter data to show for example the number of A&E attendances in a given period for each patient. The CCG can then flag to the relevant GP of the patient any patients that require intervention. An outcome of this is earlier intervention in the patient(s) care thus potentially reducing future costs and minimising future risk.
Polypharmacy re-IDs
CCG's can request re-ID of a list of patients to be sent to the relevant GP with a high number of medications (ingredient count) and review the medication for these patients. This can help address the risk of polypharmacy which is recognised as an adverse risk factor for patient safety. A by-product of such reviews may be to reduce costs of medication.
The Re-identification process for direct care is as follows:
1. The CCG identifies a patient cohort (typically small numbers) to be re-identified for the purpose of direct care.
2. The CCG sends a re-id request to the DSCRO. This may be done through the CCG or CSU’s Business Intelligence (BI) Tool, or through a manual form.
3. The DSCRO (either through an automated system or manual checking in line with the request) assesses as to whether the request passes the specified re-identification process checks. Checks include if the requester is authorised to access identifiable data, if the number of patients in the cohort is appropriate, and that the request does not seem inappropriate or outside of expected parameters, including for example around timings and the requestor’s relationship with patients in the data
4. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record.
5. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests
6. National Data opt outs are not applied for the purpose of direct care
[14 paragraphs unchanged]
Microsoft Limited and
Amazon Web Services provide Cloud Services for Optum Health Solutions (UK)
Limited and Cerner
Limited and are therefore listed as data processors. They supply support to
[24 words unchanged]
agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
Microsoft Limited provide Cloud Services for NHS North of England Commissioning Support Unit
and Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited
and are therefore listed as data processors. They supply support to the
[23 words unchanged]
agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
[58 paragraphs unchanged]
Expected output
[25 paragraphs unchanged]
o High cost activity uses (top 15%)
[8 paragraphs unchanged]
13.Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14.Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15.Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16.Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17.Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18.Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
19.Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand.
20.Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters.
21.Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals.
22.Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population
23.Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population
24.Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline.
25.Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts.
Expected measurable benefits
[34 paragraphs unchanged] 18.Allow reporting to drive changes and improve the quality of commissioned services and health outcomes for people. 19. Assists commissioners to make better decisions to support patients and drive changes in health care 20.Allows comparisons of providers performance to assist improvement in services – increase the quality 21.Allow analysis of health care provision to be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. 22.To evaluate the impact of new services and innovations (e.g. if commissioners implement a new service or type of procedure with a provider, they can evaluate whether it improves outcomes for patients compared to the previous one). 23.Monitoring of entire population, as opposed to only those that engage with services 24.Enable Commissioners to be able to see early indications of potential practice resilience issues in that an early warning marker can often be a trend of patients re-registering themselves at a neighbouring practice. 25.Monitor the quality and safety of the delivery of healthcare services. 26.Allow focused commissioning support based on factual data rather than assumed and projected sources
Benefits reported
Not stated in the previous version; added here.
The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the provided data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs.
Listed below is a number of further yielded benefits for commissioning;
1. Monitoring In year projects
2. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients
3. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
4. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
5. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
The CCG will look to build on the yielded benefits of commissioning services that meet the needs of their local population, and that are effective in their delivery. The CCG will use intelligence to add insight to strategic commissioning and service integration across the CCG Area. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population within the CCG Area.
Benefits to date are in line with what the CCG expected to achieve at the point in time as described in the previous application. The continued access to this data will enable the CCG to further understand and improve service performance and delivery, including patient pathway design, re-design and patient experience.
The CCGs has recently published their annual report for 2020/21:
NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wright CCG - https://www.hampshiresouthamptonandisleofwightccg.nhs.uk/aboutus/publications-corp-docs/annual-reports-and-accounts-1
NHS Portsmouth CCG - https://www.portsmouthccg.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Portsmouth-CCG-Annual-Report-and-Accounts-20-21.pdf
These reports highlights the achievements made during the year, of which some would only have been achieved by using the data from NHS Digital.
Further information about other achievements and future priorities can be found within the reports.
DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v1.2 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2024
- Title
- DSfC- NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wright CCG and NHS Portsmouth CCG- COMM
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 15
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v0.5
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
Objective for processing
[34 paragraphs unchanged]
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by North of England Commissioning Support
Unit
Unit, Cerner Limited
and Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited
[7 paragraphs unchanged]
Cerner will also provide analytics to the CCGs, enabling CCG analysts direct access to the data in the data warehouse.
Processing activities
[25 paragraphs unchanged] Pulsant and IT Professional Services Ltd and Equinix (UK) Ltd do not access data held under this agreement as they only [20 words unchanged] agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. [46 paragraphs unchanged] 4. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to Cerner Limited and the CCG. [3 paragraphs unchanged] Data Processor 3 - Cerner Limited - PHM Analytics 1. Cerner Limited receives the processed, pseudonymised and linked data and SUS+, Mental Health Services Data Set, Community Services Data Set, Local Flow Provider Data, GP Primary Care data and Social Care data from Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited as instructed by the CCG. 2. Cerner Limited loads the data onto a secure area of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight database that is hosted by Cerner Limited. 3. Cerner have access to the data to develop analytics outputs. 4. Analysts employed by NHS Hampshire, Southampton and the Isle of Wright CCG and NHS Portsmouth CCG are given direct access to the linked PHM data and analytics held by Cerner. 5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Cerner Limited or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
Benefits reported
Stated in the previous version and removed here.
Yielded Benefits is not a requirement for new applications.
Unchanged: Expected output, Expected measurable benefits.
Objective for processing
COMMISSIONING
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight cohorts of patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by North of England Commissioning Support Unit, Cerner Limited and Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd provide analysis such as -
• Whole population segmentation to assess population health needs
• Prospective risk scoring for individuals to indicate the likelihood of future adverse events
• Predictive modelling to determine individuals at risk and an understanding of the drivers of risk
• Longitudinal analysis of intersegmental drift - identifying individuals who move between complexity classifications and the drivers of these transitions
• The production of individual-level theographs to identify gaps in care
• Actuarial modelling to understand unmitigated and mitigated system-level activity and cost historically and in the future
Cerner will also provide analytics to the CCGs, enabling CCG analysts direct access to the data in the data warehouse.
Expected output
COMMISSIONING
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o High cost activity uses (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v0.5 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2024
- Title
- DSfC- NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wright CCG and NHS Portsmouth CCG- COMM
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 15
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners
Objective for processing
COMMISSIONING
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight cohorts of patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by North of England Commissioning Support Unit and Optum Health Solutions (UK) Limited
Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd provide analysis such as -
• Whole population segmentation to assess population health needs
• Prospective risk scoring for individuals to indicate the likelihood of future adverse events
• Predictive modelling to determine individuals at risk and an understanding of the drivers of risk
• Longitudinal analysis of intersegmental drift - identifying individuals who move between complexity classifications and the drivers of these transitions
• The production of individual-level theographs to identify gaps in care
• Actuarial modelling to understand unmitigated and mitigated system-level activity and cost historically and in the future
Expected output
COMMISSIONING
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o High cost activity uses (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
Benefits reported
Yielded Benefits is not a requirement for new applications.
Register history
When this agreement appeared in, or was edited in, each monthly edition of the register. Built by comparing every edition this site holds, the earliest of which is July 2021.
-
July 2021 —
already listed in the earliest edition this site holds, so it may be older. 1 version: DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v0.5
-
September 2021
1 version added: DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v1.2
-
December 2021
1 version added: DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V-v2.2
-
October 2022
Succeeded Applicant organisation: NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG succeeded by NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.Succeeded Data controllers: NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wight CCG succeeded by NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.Succeeded Data controllers: NHS Portsmouth CCG succeeded by NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.
Cite this page
NHS England (2026) Data Uses Register, September 2026 edition, agreement DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V, “DSfC- NHS Hampshire, Southampton and Isle of Wright CCG and NHS Portsmouth CCG- COMM”. Read via NHS Data Access Explorer (unofficial), https://healthdatauses.uk/agreements/dars-nic-438547-b6y8v/ (accessed [date]).
This address stays the same, but the page is rebuilt with each monthly edition, so the citation names the edition it shows. Every edition's data is kept in the facts store.
Source: datausesregister_september2026.xlsx, September 2026 edition of the NHS England Data Uses Register. Search that workbook for DARS-NIC-438547-B6Y8V to see the original rows.