DSfC - NHS Devon CCG: RS & IV
NHS Devon ICB · Sub ICB Location
Listed under NHS Devon Integrated Care Board.
Expired The latest version ended on 16 November 2023. The September 2026 register still lists the agreement, but its term has passed.
- Reference
- DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T
- Latest version
- v3.2
- Term of latest version
- 17 November 2020 to 16 November 2023
- Start date
- 1 April 2019
- Data controller
- Sole Data Controller
- Commercial purposes
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Files released to date
- 0
Why the data was released
Objective for processing
INVOICE VALIDATION
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) and Personal Demographic (PDS) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ and PDS data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
RISK STRATIFICATION
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Risk Stratification will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
Processing activities
PROCESSING CONDITIONS:
Data must only be used for the purposes stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement. Any additional disclosure / publication will require further approval from NHS Digital.
Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.
Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.
All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their role and the tasks that they are required to undertake.
Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed within this Data Sharing Agreement. Data released will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)
The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply National Opt-outs before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO only for the purpose of Risk Stratification.
CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools.
The only identifier available in the data set is the NHS numbers. Any further identification of the patients will only be completed by the patient’s clinician on their own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship.
ONWARD SHARING:
Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.
Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
SEGREGATION:
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital.
Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors.
DATA MINIMISATION
Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within section 3 are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied -
For the purpose of Risk Stratification:
• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within NHS Devon CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner)
For the purpose of Invoice Validation:
• CCG of residence and/or registration
DELT Shared Services Ltd supply IT infrastructure and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
Stem Group do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
INVOICE VALIDATION
1. Identifiable SUS+ and PDS Data is obtained by the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ and PDS data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) located in the CCG.
3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider.
4. The CEfF conduct the following processing activities for invoice validation purposes:
a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and PDS and/or provider backing flow data.
b. Once the provider backing information is received, it will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies, as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs
ii. In relation to a patient registered with the CCG, GP or resident within the CCG area.
iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.
5. The CCG are notified by the CEfF that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved.
RISK STRATIFICATION
1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to the CCG, who securely hold the SUS+ data.
3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to the CCG.
4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
6. Once the CCG has completed the processing, access is available within the CCG through the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level
Expected output
INVOICE VALIDATION
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
5. Support validating financial payments for contracted and non-contracted activity, determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
RISK STRATIFICATION
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
CCGs will be able to:
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
Expected measurable benefits
INVOICE VALIDATION
The invoice validation process supports the ongoing delivery of patient care across the NHS and the CCG region by:
1. Ensuring that activity is fully financially validated.
2. Ensuring that service providers are accurately paid for the patients treatment.
3. Enabling services to be planned, commissioned, managed, and subjected to financial control.
4. Enabling commissioners to confirm that they are paying appropriately for treatment of patients for whom they are responsible.
5. Fulfilling commissioners duties to fiscal probity and scrutiny.
6. Ensuring full financial accountability for relevant organisations.
7. Ensuring robust commissioning and performance management.
8. Ensuring commissioning objectives do not compromise patient confidentiality.
9. Ensuring the avoidance of misappropriation of public funds.
RISK STRATIFICATION
Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:
1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
2. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services thus allowing early intervention.
3. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
4. Supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework by allowing for more targeted intervention in primary care.
5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and healthcare outcomes
All of the above lead to improved patient experience and health outcomes through more effective commissioning of services.
Benefits reported so far
Not stated in the register.
Datasets on the latest version
Legal basis for provision: Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'.
| Dataset | Type of data | Sensitivity | Frequency | Confidential data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Demographic Service | Identifiable | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Section 251 NHS Act 2006 |
| SUS for Commissioners | Identifiable | Sensitive | Frequent Adhoc Flow | Section 251 NHS Act 2006 |
Files released
Files released counts only files released externally by DARS. Access granted in NHS England's own systems, such as its Secure Data Environment, is not included.
No files recorded as released under this agreement.
Version history
The register lists each renewal of this agreement as a separate row. This site has 4 versions.
DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v3.2 17 November 2020 to 16 November 2023
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Devon CCG: RS & IV
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 2
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Personal Demographic Service; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v2.4
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Title | DSfC - NHS Devon CCG: RS & IV | |
| Start date | 2020-11-17 | |
| End date | 2023-11-16 | |
| SUS for Commissioners: legal basis | Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'. | |
| SUS for Commissioners: type of data | Identifiable | |
| SUS for Commissioners: common law duty of confidentiality | Section 251 NHS Act 2006 |
Datasets:
+ Personal Demographic Service · − Acute-Local Provider Flows; − Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; − Children and Young People Health; − Civil Registration - Births; − Civil Registrations of Death; − Community Services Data Set (CSDS); − Community-Local Provider Flows; − Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; − Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); − Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; − Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; − Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; − Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set_v1.5; − Maternity Services Data Set v1.5; − Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); − Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); − Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); − Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; − National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); − National Diabetes Audit; − Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; − Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); − Population Data-Local Provider Flows; − Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; − Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows
Objective for processing
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is
are
able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+)
and Personal Demographic (PDS)
data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+
and PDS
data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and
will not be used further.
determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
[6 paragraphs unchanged]
COMMISSIONING
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)
- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)
- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)
- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG and South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Processing activities
[20 paragraphs unchanged]
For the purpose of Commissioning:
• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Devon CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner).
and/or
• Patients treated by a provider where NHS Devon CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.
and/or
• Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Devon CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.
[5 paragraphs unchanged]
Stem Group
and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply
[19 words unchanged]
agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
In addition to the dissemination of Cancer Waiting Times Data via the DSCRO, the CCG is able to access reports held within the CWT system in NHS Digital directly. Access within the CCG is limited to those with a need to process the data for the purposes described in this agreement.
A CCG user will be able to access the provider extracts from the portal for any provider where at least 1 patient for whom they are the registered CCG for that individuals GP practice appears in that setting
Although a CCG user may have access to pseudonymised patient information not related to that CCG, users should only process and analyse data for which they have a legitimate relationship (as described within Data Minimisation).
[1 paragraph unchanged]
1. Identifiable SUS+
and PDS
Data is obtained
from the SUS+ Repository
by the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+
and PDS
data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) located in the CCG.
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+
and PDS
and/or provider backing flow data.
[12 paragraphs unchanged]
COMMISSIONING
The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:
1. SUS+
2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers)
a. Acute
b. Ambulance
c. Community
d. Demand for Service
e. Diagnostic Service
f. Emergency Care
g. Experience, Quality and Outcomes
h. Mental Health
i. Other Not Elsewhere Classified
j. Population Data
k. Primary Care Services
l. Public Health Screening
3. Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
4. Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
5. Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
6. Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
7. Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
8. Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
9. Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
10. Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
11. National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)
12. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)
13. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)
14. National Diabetes Audit (NDA)
15. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows:
South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & NHS Devon CCG
1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
2. The CCG and South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit then add derived fields, link data and provide analysis to:
a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning
b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers
c. Undertake population health management
d. Undertake data quality and validation checks
e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population
f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk
g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments
3. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1.
4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG who provide further analysis.
5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by the CCG or South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit as instructed by the CCG.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
Expected output
[7 paragraphs unchanged]
5. Support validating financial payments for contracted and non-contracted activity, determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.
[19 paragraphs unchanged]
COMMISSIONING
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
Expected measurable benefits
[18 paragraphs unchanged]
All of the above lead to improved patient experience
and health outcomes
through more effective commissioning of services.
COMMISSIONING
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts
13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed.
15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice.
16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region.
17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years.
DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v2.4 15 November 2019 to 14 November 2022
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Devon CCG: Comm, RS & IV
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 27
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); National Diabetes Audit; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v1.2
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Start date | 2019-11-15 | |
| End date | 2022-11-14 | |
| Acute-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Acute-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Ambulance-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Ambulance-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Children and Young People Health: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Children and Young People Health: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Civil Registration - Births: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Civil Registration - Births: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Civil Registrations of Death: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Civil Registrations of Death: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Community Services Data Set (CSDS): sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Community Services Data Set (CSDS): common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Community-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Community-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID): sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID): common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set_v1.5: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set_v1.5: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Maternity Services Data Set v1.5: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Maternity Services Data Set v1.5: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS): sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS): common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS): sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS): common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS): sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS): common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Mental Health-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Mental Health-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS): sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS): common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Population Data-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Population Data-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) | |
| SUS for Commissioners: sensitivity | Sensitive | |
| SUS for Commissioners: common law duty of confidentiality | Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s) |
Datasets: + National Diabetes Audit; + Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
Objective for processing
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so they are able to ensure that the activity claimed for
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.
each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is
The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets and will not be used further.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006.
Invoice Validation with be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
[1 paragraph unchanged]
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk
(of health deterioration and using multiple services)
or are likely to be at high risk and
prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with
Risk Stratification will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of
future demand by identifying high risk patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high
levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006 (CAG 7-04(a)).
Risk Stratification will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
The NHS and local councils have come together in 44 areas covering all of England to develop proposals to improve health
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
and care. They have formed new partnerships-known as sustainability and transformation partnerships - to plan jointly
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
for the next few years.
Sustainability and transformation partnerships build on collaborative work that began under the NHS Shared Planning
Guidance for 2016/17-2020/21, to support implementation of the Five Year Forward View. They are supported by six
national health and care bodies: NHS England; NHS Improvement; the Care Quality Commission (CQC); Health Education
England (HEE); Public Health England (PHE) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
NHS Northern Eastern and Western Devon CCG and NHS South Devon and Torbay CCG are part of the Devon Sustainable
Transformation Partnership and will merge into NHS Devon CCG on the 1st April 2019. The STP is responsible for implementing large parts of the 5 year forward view from NHS
England. The STP is implementing several initiatives:
- Putting the patient at the heart of the health system
- Working across organisational boundaries to deliver care and including social care, public Health, providers and GPs as
well as CCGs
- Reviewing patient pathways to improve patient experience whilst reducing costs e.g. reduce the number of standard tests
a patient may have and only have the ones they need
- Planning the demand and capacity across the healthcare system across the CCG to ensure we have the right buildings,
services and staff to cope with demand whilst reducing the impact on costs
- Working to prevent or capture conditions early as they are cheaper to treat
- Introduce initiatives to change behaviours e.g. move more care into the community
- Patient pathway planning for the above
To ensure the patient is at the heart of care, the STP is focussing on where services are required across the geographical
region. This assists to ensure delivery of care in the right place for patients who may move and change services across the CCG.
Collaborative sharing is required for CCGs to understand these requirements.
The CCG will use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data
(containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the
needs of the population within the STP area.
The CCG commissions services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories
requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
[23 paragraphs unchanged]
- National Cancer Waiting Times
Monitoring Data Set
(CWT)
- Civil Registries Data (CRD)
(Births and Deaths)
(Births)
The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes:
- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)
- Population health management:
- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)
- Understanding the interdependency of care services
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
- Targeting care more effectively
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
- Using value as the redesign principle
Population health management:
- Ensuring we do what we should
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
- Data Quality and Validation - allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
• Targeting care more effectively
- Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and
• Using value as the redesign principle
where they need them
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
- Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
understand and manage those needs
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
-
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the
provision of care may be being duplicated
provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
- Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how
Service redesign
changes in one service may affect flows through another
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
- Service redesign
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
- Health Needs Assessment - identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
- Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to identify specific patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG and South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and
identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs
of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by the CCG
Processing activities
PROCESSING CONDITIONS:
[3 paragraphs unchanged]
All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their role and the tasks that they are required to undertake.
Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed within this Data Sharing Agreement. Data released will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)
The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply National Opt-outs before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO only for the purpose of Risk Stratification.
CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools.
The only identifier available in the data set is the NHS numbers. Any further identification of the patients will only be completed by the patient’s clinician on their own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship.
ONWARD SHARING:
[1 paragraph unchanged]
All access to data is managed under Roles-Based Access Controls.
Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
No patient level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality and that data required by the applicant.
SEGREGATION:
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)
The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply Type 2 objections before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO only for the purpose of Risk Stratification.
CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools.
Segregation
[1 paragraph unchanged]
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
[15 paragraphs unchanged]
Stem Group
and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply
[19 words unchanged]
agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.
Identifiable data will only be disclosed:
In addition to the dissemination of Cancer Waiting Times Data via the DSCRO, the CCG is able to access reports held within the CWT system in NHS Digital directly. Access within the CCG is limited to those with a need to process the data for the purposes described in this agreement.
1) where the requesting Data Controller’s Caldicott Guardian/Senior Approving Officer has approved the disclosure
A CCG user will be able to access the provider extracts from the portal for any provider where at least 1 patient for whom they are the registered CCG for that individuals GP practice appears in that setting
2) where the DSCRO Information Risk Owner has approved the disclosure
Although a CCG user may have access to pseudonymised patient information not related to that CCG, users should only process and analyse data for which they have a legitimate relationship (as described within Data Minimisation).
3) to requestor/recipients specified by the Data Controller
4) to recipients that have a legitimate relationship with the individuals identified by the data, e.g. clinician
5) using mechanisms and routes that are secure and have an appropriate legal basis for holding identifiable data
6) where there is a legal basis and it is covered by a Data Sharing Agreement that justifies its use or the data subject has consented or where there is a separate legal basis for making the dataset identifiable enabling the re-identification to take place
7) whilst continuing to respect the data subject’s preferences for data sharing
In order for identifiable data to be disclosed, all seven requirements must be met.
Where identifiable data for the same dataset to the same organisation is released by NHS Digital (via a DSCRO), relevant controls must be in place locally by the recipient organisation to ensure that identifiable data is stored separately, under strict access control provisions, from its original anonymised in accordance with the ICOACoP form and used only for the specific purpose stipulated in this agreement. There must be no efforts made by the recipient organisation to link these datasets.
Local Identifiers:
If a Data Controller organisation (or the Data Processor working on their behalf):
a. only receives a DSCRO disseminated identifiable (NHS Number) flow, then it can receive clear local identifiers.
b. receives and pseudonymised flow, then clear local identifiers can be included and used only for the purpose outlined within the Data Sharing Agreement
c. receives both DSCRO disseminated identifiable and pseudonymised flows, the identifiable flow must have the local identifiers pseudonymised or removed.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
1. Identifiable SUS+ Data is obtained from the SUS+ Repository by the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office
(DSCRO).
(DSCRO).
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) located in the CCG.
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) located in NHS Devon CCG.
3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider.
3.
4.
The CEfF conduct the following processing activities for invoice validation purposes:
a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group
is
are
responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+
and/or provider backing flow data.
and/or backing flow data.
b. Once the provider backing information is received, it will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies, as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
b. Once the backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as
well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
[1 paragraph unchanged]
ii. In relation to a patient registered with the
CCG
CCG,
GP or resident within the CCG area.
4. The CCG are notified by the CEfF that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or nonvalidated
iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.
invoices are investigated and resolved.
5. The CCG are notified by the CEfF that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved.
Invoice Validation work is only undertaken once. There is no duplication of the work. The CCG will only receive data
related to that CCG.
[1 paragraph unchanged]
1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office
(DSCRO).
(DSCRO).
2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to the CCG, who securely hold the SUS+ data.
2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level
of NHS number is transferred securely to NHS Devon CCG, who hold the SUS+ data
within the secure Data Centre on N3.
[2 paragraphs unchanged]
5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data
processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The
6. Once the CCG has completed the processing, access is available within the CCG through the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level
only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be
completed by the GP on their own systems.
6. Once the CCG has completed the processing, access is available through the online system via a secure N3 connection to
access the data pseudonymised at patient level.
Risk Stratification work is only undertaken once. There is no duplication of the work.
[24 paragraphs unchanged]
11. National Cancer Waiting Times
Monitoring Data Set
(CWT)
12. Civil Registries Data (CRD)
(Births)
13. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)
14. National Diabetes Audit (NDA)
15. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
[1 paragraph unchanged]
1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People's Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times (CWT) and Civil Registries Data (CRD) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to the CCG.
South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & NHS Devon CCG
2. The CCG then add derived fields, link data and provide analysis to:
1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
2. The CCG and South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit then add derived fields, link data and provide analysis to:
[8 paragraphs unchanged]
4. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by the CCG.
4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG who provide further analysis.
5. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by the CCG or South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit as instructed by the CCG.
In addition to the dissemination of Cancer Waiting Times Data via the DSCRO, the CCG is able to access reports held within the CWT system in NHS Digital directly. Access within the CCG is limited to those with a need to process the data for the purposes described in this agreement.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.
Expected output
[9 paragraphs unchanged]
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level.
CCGs will be able to:
4. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
5. The CCG will be able to target specific patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions. The CCG will also be able to:
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
o Stratify populations based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
o Plan work for commissioning services and contracts
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
o Set up capitated budgets
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
o Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
[40 paragraphs unchanged]
Expected measurable benefits
[17 paragraphs unchanged]
5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and
healthcare outcomes
6. healthcare outcomes
[35 paragraphs unchanged]
Objective for processing
INVOICE VALIDATION
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.
The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
Invoice Validation will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
RISK STRATIFICATION
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Risk Stratification will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
COMMISSIONING
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)
- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)
- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)
- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
Service redesign
Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG and South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit
Expected output
INVOICE VALIDATION
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
RISK STRATIFICATION
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
CCGs will be able to:
3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.
4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.
5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.
6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.
7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.
8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.
9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.
11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.
12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.
13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.
14. Analyse based on specific diseases
In addition:
- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.
COMMISSIONING
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v1.2 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2022
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Devon CCG: Comm, RS & IV
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 25
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
What changed from DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v0.3
Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.
| Field | Was | Became |
|---|---|---|
| Acute-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Ambulance-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Children and Young People Health: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Civil Registration - Births: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Civil Registrations of Death: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Community Services Data Set (CSDS): sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Community-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID): sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set_v1.5: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Maternity Services Data Set v1.5: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS): sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS): sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS): sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Mental Health-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS): sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Population Data-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive | |
| SUS for Commissioners: sensitivity | Non-Sensitive |
Processing activities
[111 paragraphs unchanged] In addition to the dissemination of Cancer Waiting Times Data via the DSCRO, the CCG is able to access reports held within the CWT system in NHS Digital directly. Access within the CCG is limited to those with a need to process the data for the purposes described in this agreement.
Benefits reported
Stated in the previous version and removed here.
Yielded Benefits is not a requirement for new applications.
Unchanged: Objective for processing, Expected output, Expected measurable benefits.
Objective for processing
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so they are able to ensure that the activity claimed for
each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is
received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number.
The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets and will not be used further.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006.
Invoice Validation with be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk or are likely to be at high risk and
prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with
Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of
future demand by identifying high risk patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high
levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006 (CAG 7-04(a)).
Risk Stratification will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG.
Commissioning
The NHS and local councils have come together in 44 areas covering all of England to develop proposals to improve health
and care. They have formed new partnerships-known as sustainability and transformation partnerships - to plan jointly
for the next few years.
Sustainability and transformation partnerships build on collaborative work that began under the NHS Shared Planning
Guidance for 2016/17-2020/21, to support implementation of the Five Year Forward View. They are supported by six
national health and care bodies: NHS England; NHS Improvement; the Care Quality Commission (CQC); Health Education
England (HEE); Public Health England (PHE) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
NHS Northern Eastern and Western Devon CCG and NHS South Devon and Torbay CCG are part of the Devon Sustainable
Transformation Partnership and will merge into NHS Devon CCG on the 1st April 2019. The STP is responsible for implementing large parts of the 5 year forward view from NHS
England. The STP is implementing several initiatives:
- Putting the patient at the heart of the health system
- Working across organisational boundaries to deliver care and including social care, public Health, providers and GPs as
well as CCGs
- Reviewing patient pathways to improve patient experience whilst reducing costs e.g. reduce the number of standard tests
a patient may have and only have the ones they need
- Planning the demand and capacity across the healthcare system across the CCG to ensure we have the right buildings,
services and staff to cope with demand whilst reducing the impact on costs
- Working to prevent or capture conditions early as they are cheaper to treat
- Introduce initiatives to change behaviours e.g. move more care into the community
- Patient pathway planning for the above
To ensure the patient is at the heart of care, the STP is focussing on where services are required across the geographical
region. This assists to ensure delivery of care in the right place for patients who may move and change services across the CCG.
Collaborative sharing is required for CCGs to understand these requirements.
The CCG will use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data
(containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the
needs of the population within the STP area.
The CCG commissions services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories
requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
- National Cancer Waiting Times (CWT)
- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths)
The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes:
- Population health management:
- Understanding the interdependency of care services
- Targeting care more effectively
- Using value as the redesign principle
- Ensuring we do what we should
- Data Quality and Validation - allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
- Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and
where they need them
- Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better
understand and manage those needs
- Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the
provision of care may be being duplicated
- Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how
changes in one service may affect flows through another
- Service redesign
- Health Needs Assessment - identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
- Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to identify specific patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and
other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and
identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs
of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by the CCG
Expected output
Invoice Validation
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level.
4. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
5. The CCG will be able to target specific patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions. The CCG will also be able to:
o Stratify populations based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost
o Plan work for commissioning services and contracts
o Set up capitated budgets
o Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v0.3 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2022
- Title
- DSfC - NHS Devon CCG: Comm, RS & IV
- Commercial
- No
- Sublicensing
- No
- Datasets
- 25
- Files released
- 0
Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners
Objective for processing
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so they are able to ensure that the activity claimed for
each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is
received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number.
The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets and will not be used further.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006.
Invoice Validation with be conducted by NHS Devon CCG
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk or are likely to be at high risk and
prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with
Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of
future demand by identifying high risk patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high
levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006 (CAG 7-04(a)).
Risk Stratification will be conducted by NHS Devon CCG.
Commissioning
The NHS and local councils have come together in 44 areas covering all of England to develop proposals to improve health
and care. They have formed new partnerships-known as sustainability and transformation partnerships - to plan jointly
for the next few years.
Sustainability and transformation partnerships build on collaborative work that began under the NHS Shared Planning
Guidance for 2016/17-2020/21, to support implementation of the Five Year Forward View. They are supported by six
national health and care bodies: NHS England; NHS Improvement; the Care Quality Commission (CQC); Health Education
England (HEE); Public Health England (PHE) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
NHS Northern Eastern and Western Devon CCG and NHS South Devon and Torbay CCG are part of the Devon Sustainable
Transformation Partnership and will merge into NHS Devon CCG on the 1st April 2019. The STP is responsible for implementing large parts of the 5 year forward view from NHS
England. The STP is implementing several initiatives:
- Putting the patient at the heart of the health system
- Working across organisational boundaries to deliver care and including social care, public Health, providers and GPs as
well as CCGs
- Reviewing patient pathways to improve patient experience whilst reducing costs e.g. reduce the number of standard tests
a patient may have and only have the ones they need
- Planning the demand and capacity across the healthcare system across the CCG to ensure we have the right buildings,
services and staff to cope with demand whilst reducing the impact on costs
- Working to prevent or capture conditions early as they are cheaper to treat
- Introduce initiatives to change behaviours e.g. move more care into the community
- Patient pathway planning for the above
To ensure the patient is at the heart of care, the STP is focussing on where services are required across the geographical
region. This assists to ensure delivery of care in the right place for patients who may move and change services across the CCG.
Collaborative sharing is required for CCGs to understand these requirements.
The CCG will use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data
(containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the
needs of the population within the STP area.
The CCG commissions services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories
requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
- National Cancer Waiting Times (CWT)
- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths)
The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes:
- Population health management:
- Understanding the interdependency of care services
- Targeting care more effectively
- Using value as the redesign principle
- Ensuring we do what we should
- Data Quality and Validation - allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
- Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and
where they need them
- Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better
understand and manage those needs
- Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the
provision of care may be being duplicated
- Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how
changes in one service may affect flows through another
- Service redesign
- Health Needs Assessment - identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
- Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to identify specific patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and
other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and
identification of future service delivery models
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs
of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by the CCG
Expected output
Invoice Validation
1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.
2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:
a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues
b. Assist in business intelligence
3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.
4. Budget control of the CCG.
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level.
4. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
5. The CCG will be able to target specific patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions. The CCG will also be able to:
o Stratify populations based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost
o Plan work for commissioning services and contracts
o Set up capitated budgets
o Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.
Benefits reported
Yielded Benefits is not a requirement for new applications.
Register history
When this agreement appeared in, or was edited in, each monthly edition of the register. Built by comparing every edition this site holds, the earliest of which is July 2021.
-
July 2021 —
already listed in the earliest edition this site holds, so it may be older. 4 versions: DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v0.3, DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v1.2, DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v2.4, DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v3.2
-
October 2022
Succeeded Applicant organisation: NHS Devon CCG succeeded by NHS Devon ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.Succeeded Data controllers: NHS Devon CCG succeeded by NHS Devon ICB from 1 July 2022, according to NHS ODS. Not counted as a change.
-
December 2022
Register-wide edit DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v0.3, DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v1.2, DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T-v2.4 — Datasets: legal basis: “
s261(1) and” taken out. Made to 639 agreements in this edition, so it is reported once, on the changes page, and not counted as an amendment of this agreement.
Cite this page
NHS England (2026) Data Uses Register, September 2026 edition, agreement DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T, “DSfC - NHS Devon CCG: RS & IV”. Read via NHS Data Access Explorer (unofficial), https://healthdatauses.uk/agreements/dars-nic-264169-j6f6t/ (accessed [date]).
This address stays the same, but the page is rebuilt with each monthly edition, so the citation names the edition it shows. Every edition's data is kept in the facts store.
Source: datausesregister_september2026.xlsx, September 2026 edition of the NHS England Data Uses Register. Search that workbook for DARS-NIC-264169-J6F6T to see the original rows.