Unofficial. This site is an experimental reformatting of data published by NHS England. It is not endorsed by NHS England. Always check the official Data Uses Register before relying on anything here.

DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV

NHS Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West ICB · Sub ICB Location

Listed under NHS Thames Valley Integrated Care Board.

Expired The latest version ended on 13 August 2024. The September 2026 register still lists the agreement, but its term has passed.

Reference
DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B
Latest version
v8.2
Term of latest version
14 August 2021 to 13 August 2024
Start date
Before 1 May 2019
Data controller
Sole Data Controller
Commercial purposes
No
Sublicensing
No
Files released to date
0

Why the data was released

Objective for processing

Invoice Validation

Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.

Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) and Personal Demographic (PDS) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ and PDS data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number and is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.

The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.

Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.

To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+), identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.

Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited.

Graphnet Healthcare Ltd

The processing is not excessive or parallel as the platform through which the risk stratification is deployed is different to the way the SCW CSU solution is deployed and created due to:-

• The Graphnet risk stratification solution works with near real time updates from primary care providing scores which are based on more up to date data set.

• It provides better decision making capability for GP’s, allowing them to access a wider set of information alongside the stratified data set (e.g. accessing social care, community and mental health pages within the shared cared record)

• The GP’s can access the shared care record risk stratification information from within the EMIS clinical solution allowing GP’s to access risk stratification information seamlessly.

When the solution is live, the CCG will look to consolidate the use of different solutions.

Commissioning

To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:

- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)

- Local Provider Flows

o Acute

o Ambulance

o Community

o Demand for Service

o Diagnostic Service

o Emergency Care

o Experience, Quality and Outcomes

o Mental Health

o Other Not Elsewhere Classified

o Population Data

o Primary Care Services

o Public Health Screening

- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)

- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)

- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)

- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)

- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)

- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)

- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)

- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)

- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)

- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

-- e-Referral Service (eRS)

- Personal Demographics Service (PDS)

- Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI)

- Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data)

- Adult Social Care Data

Processing of the Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) dataset is only permitted to provide intelligence about the safety and effectiveness of medicines, as specified by the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) Medicines Data Directions 2019.

The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:

-Population health management:

· Understanding the interdependency of care services

· Targeting care more effectively

-Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

- Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them

- Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs

- Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated

- Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another

- Service redesign

- Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population

- Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight cohorts of patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models

-Demand Management - to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and support the secondary care system in ensuring enough capacity to manage the demand.

- Support measuring the health, mortality or care needs of the total local population.

 Allow analysis of patient pathways across healthcare and social care.

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd & Monmouth Partners Ltd

Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave 2 Population Health Management CCG. NHS England has contracted Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd to work with selected CCGs to undertake population health and actuarial analysis to build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for this project will be destroyed within 6 months of completion of the project and permissions as a data processor for this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment.

Monmouth Partners Ltd

The CCG has appointed Monmouth Partners Ltd to review gynaecology activity to support the CCGs Quality Team.

Processing activities

Data must only be used for the purposes stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement. Any additional disclosure / publication will require further approval from NHS Digital.

Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.

Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.

All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their role and the tasks that they are required to undertake.

Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed within this Data Sharing Agreement. Data released will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement.

The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data.

NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)

The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply National Opt-outs before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO only for the purpose of Risk Stratification.

CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools.

The identifier available in the data set is the NHS numbers. Any further identification of the patients will only be completed by the patient’s clinician on their own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship.

Onward Sharing

There is no requirement for the analytical teams to re-identify patients, but in the development of cohorts of patients considered to be at risk, the data controllers may need the facility to provide identifiable results back to direct healthcare professionals or local authority direct care staff only for the purpose of direct care. All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by the DSCRO on a case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these cases as they are for the purposes of direct care which follows the legal basis of implied consent.

An example of a request for the re-id of patients for direct care may be;

A&E High Attendance usage

The CCG can filter data to show for example the number of A&E attendances in a given period for each patient. The CCG can then flag to the relevant GP of the patient any patients that require intervention. An outcome of this is earlier intervention in the patient(s) care thus potentially reducing future costs and minimising future risk.

Polypharmacy re-IDs

CCG's can request re-ID of a list of patients to be sent to the relevant GP with a high number of medications (ingredient count) and review the medication for these patients. This can help address the risk of polypharmacy which is recognised as an adverse risk factor for patient safety. A by-product of such reviews may be to reduce costs of medication.

The Re-identification process for direct care is as follows:

1. The CCG identifies a patient cohort (typically small numbers) to be re-identified for the purpose of direct care.

2. The CCG sends a re-id request to the DSCRO. This may be done through the CCG or CSU’s Business Intelligence (BI) Tool, or through a manual form.

3. The DSCRO (either through an automated system or manual checking in line with the request) assesses as to whether the request passes the specified re-identification process checks. Checks include if the requester is authorised to access identifiable data, if the number of patients in the cohort is appropriate, and that the request does not seem inappropriate or outside of expected parameters, including for example around timings and the requestor’s relationship with patients in the data

4. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record.

5. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests

6. National Data opt outs are not applied for the purpose of direct care

Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

Segregation

Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. Data will be held separately from that for the purpose of direct care.

Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.

All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital.

Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors.

Data Minimisation

Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied -

For the purpose of Commissioning:

• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Berkshire West CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner).

and/or

• Patients treated by a provider where NHS Berkshire West CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.

and/or

• Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Berkshire West CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.

For the purpose of Risk Stratification:

• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within NHS Berkshire West CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner

For the purpose of Invoice Validation:

• CCG of residence and/or registration.

in addition to the dissemination of Cancer Waiting Times Data via the DSCRO, the CCG is able to access reports held within the CWT system in NHS Digital directly. Access within the CCG is limited to those with a need to process the data for the purposes described in this agreement.

A CCG user will be able to access the provider extracts from the portal for any provider where at least 1 patient for whom they are the registered CCG for that individuals GP practice appears in that setting

Although a CCG user may have access to pseudonymised patient information not related to that CCG, users should only process and analyse data for which they have a legitimate relationship (as described within Data Minimisation).

Microsoft Limited supply Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd, South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, Optum Health Solutions UK Limited and North and East London Commissioning Support Unit and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement.

Amazon Web Services supply Cloud Services for Optum Health Solutions UK Limited and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database containing the data.

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.

ANS Group will be assisting in the set up and management of the South, Central and West CSU Microsoft Azure Cloud and are therefore listed as a data processor. They will not have any additional processing / storage addresses (as these will be the Microsoft Azure addresses). Using the data for any other purpose would be considered a breach of this agreement.

ATOS Healthcare (part of ATOS IT Services UK Limited) will be providing South, Central and West CSU with staff resource and subject matter expertise to assist in the delivery of products and services. Named individuals will have access to pseudonymised patient level data via South, Central and West CSU servers and secure logins. No data will leave South, Central and West CSU, and therefore no processing and storage addresses are listed.

Interxion and Ark Data Centres do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.

Invoice Validation - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

1. Identifiable SUS+ and PDS Data is obtained from the SUS+ and PDS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).

2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ and PDS data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit.

3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider.

4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes:

a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and PDS and/or provider backing flow data.

b. Once the provider backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:

i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs

ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area.

iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.

5. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit CEfF team and the provider, meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc.

RISK STRATIFICATION - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).

2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, who securely hold the SUS+.

3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit.

4. SUS+ is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.

5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

6. Once South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG.

Risk Stratification - Data Processor 2 - Graphnet Health Limited

1. Identifiable SUS+ is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).

2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to Graphnet Health Limited, who securely hold the SUS+ data.

3. Identifiable GP Data is sourced from the CareCentric Shared Care Record system held by Graphnet Health Limited.

4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification algorithm within the CareCentric system by the data processor.

5. GPs will have access to the risk stratification scores within the CareCentric system. Clinicians will open their clinical system and launch CareCentric from within it, to access risk stratification reports.

6. The application allows Clinicians (in this instance GPs) to access risk stratification scores for patients alongside further information from the Shared Care Record, providing up to date information on events within primary care, secondary care, community care, mental health and social care. This supports better and more effective clinical decision making and saves time for clinicians as they do not have to search through different systems to gather information on a patients care. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

7. Once Graphnet Health Limited has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG.

Commissioning

The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:

1. SUS+

2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers)

a. Acute

b. Ambulance

c. Community

d. Demand for Service

e. Diagnostic Service

f. Emergency Care

g. Experience, Quality and Outcomes

h. Mental Health

i. Other Not Elsewhere Classified

j. Population Data

k. Primary Care Services

l. Public Health Screening

3. Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)

4. Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)

5. Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

6. Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)

7. Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)

8. Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)

9. Community Services Data Set (CSDS)

10. Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)

11. National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)

12. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)

13. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)

14. National Diabetes Audit (NDA)

15. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

16. e-Referral Service (eRS)

17. Personal Demographics Service (PDS)

18. Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI)

19. Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data)

20. Adult Social Care Data

Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows:

Data Processor 1 – NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA), Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), e-Referral Service (eRS), Personal Demographics Service (PDS), Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI), Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) and Adult Social Care data only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit.

2. NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit receives GP data. GP data is received as follows:

o Identifiable GP data is submitted to NHS SCW CSU.

o The identifiable data lands in a ring-fenced area for GP data only.

o The GP data is pseudonymised using a pseudonymisation tool, different to that used by the DSCRO.

o There is a Data Processing Agreement in place between the GP and NHS SCW CSU. A specific named individual within NHS SCW CSU acts on behalf of the GP.

o This individual has access to a black box. The pseudonymised data is passed through the black box process where the pseudonymisation is mapped to the pseudonymisation used by the DSCRO.

o Once mapped, the data is passed into NHS SCW CSU, but before NHS SCW CSU will receive the data from the ring-fenced area, they require confirmation that the identifiable data has been deleted.

o NHS SCW CSU are then sent the pseudonymised GP data with the pseudo algorithm specific to them.

3. NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit also receive a flow of social care data. Social care data is received in one of the following 2 ways:

- Pseudonymised:

o Social care data is pseudonymised within the provider using a pseudonymisation tool, different to that used by the DSCRO. The provider requests a pseudonymisation key from the DSCRO. The key can only be used once. The key is specific to the Local Authority and to that specific date.

o The pseudonymised data lands in a ring-fenced area for social care data only.

o There is a Data Processing Agreement in place between the Provider and NHS SCW CSU. A specific named individual within NHS SCW CSU acts on behalf of the provider.

o This individual has access to a black box. The pseudonymised data is passed through the black box process where the pseudonymisation is mapped to the pseudonymisation used by the DSCRO.

o The data is then passed into the non-ringfenced area with the pseudo algorithm specific to them.

- Identifiable

o Identifiable social care data is submitted to NHS SCW CSU.

o The identifiable data lands in a ring-fenced area for social care data only.

o The social care data is pseudonymised using a pseudonymisation tool, different to that used by the DSCRO.

o There is a Data Processing Agreement in place between the Local Authority and NHS SCW CSU. A specific named individual within NHS SCW CSU acts on behalf of the provider.

o This individual has access to a black box. The pseudonymised data is passed through the black box process where the pseudonymisation is mapped to the pseudonymisation used by the DSCRO.

o Once mapped, the data is passed into NHS SCW CSU, but before NHS SCW CSU will receive the data from the ring-fenced area, they require confirmation that the identifiable data has been deleted.

o NHS SCW CSU are then sent the pseudonymised social care data with the pseudo algorithm specific to them.

4. Once the pseudonymised GP data and social care data is received, NHS SCW CSU make a request to the DSCRO.

5. The DSCRO checks the dates of the key generation (see Points 2 and 3 above).

6. The DSCRO then send a mapping table to NHS SCW CSU.

7. NHS SCW CSU then overwrite the organisation specific keys with the DSCRO key.

8. The mapping table is then deleted.

9. The DSCRO then pass the pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young Peoples Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported outcomes Measures (PROMs) e-Referral Service (eRS), Personal Demographics Service (PDS), Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI), Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) and Adult Social Care data only securely to NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.

10. Social Care Data and GP Data is then linked to the datasets listed within Point 9. NHS SCW CSU then analyse the data to do the following:

a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning

b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers

c. Undertake population health management

d. Undertake data quality and validation checks

e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population

f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk

g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments

11. NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.

12. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.

13. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

Data Processor 2 – Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd

1) Pseudonymised SUS is securely transferred from SCW DSCRO to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd.

2) NEL DSCRO will receive and process Local Provider data for the London providers and disseminate the pseudonymised data to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd via the North East London Commissioning Support Unit SFTP process.

3) Data will be pseudonymised in such a way as to allow linkage between data in points (1) and (2) above.

4) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd add derived fields, link SUS fields and provide analysis to:

o See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning (CCG).

o Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers (CCG).

o Undertake population health management

o Undertake data quality and validation checks

o Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population

o Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk

o Conduct Health Needs Assessments

5) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.

6) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.

7) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.

Data Processor 2 - Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - for the NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Mental Health Services Data Set, Community Services Data Set, Local Flow Provider Data, GP Primary Care data and Social Care data is securely transferred from NHS Berkshire West CCG to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd. The data is decoupled from the other national datasets and sent as individual data flows.

2. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd provide analysis to:

o Whole population segmentation to assess population health needs

o Prospective risk scoring for individuals to indicate the likelihood of future adverse events

o Predictive modelling to determine individuals at risk and an understanding of the drivers of risk

o Longitudinal analysis of intersegmental drift identifying individuals who move between complexity classifications and the drivers of these transitions

o The production of individual-level theographs to identify gaps in care

3. Allowed linkage is between the datasets contained within point (1) above. GP and Social Care datasets are needed for the processing carried out by Optum to enhance the population health analytics beyond SUS+ and LPF's which contain only secondary care activity

4. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.

5. Aggregated of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.

6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

7. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd will only be in receipt of data specified in Point 1 and only be permitted to act as Data processors for the period specified in the NHS England contract with NHS Berkshire West CCG.

8. The NHS England / Optum contractual period with NHS Berkshire West CCG is anticipated to end in July / August 2020, at which point the data processor will be removed from this agreement by amendment.

Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for the purpose of the NHS England Wave 2 PHM project will be destroyed within 6 months of the completion of the project and permissions as a data processor will be removed from this agreement by amendment.

Data Processor 4 - Monmouth Partners Limited

1. Pseudonymised SUS+ and Local Provider data is transferred securely from NHS South, Central and West CSU or NHS Berkshire West CCG to Monmouth Partners Limited.

2. Monmouth Partners Limited provide analysis to:

a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning

b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers

c. Undertake population health management

d. Undertake data quality and validation checks

e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population

f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk

g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments

3. Monmouth Partners Limited then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.

4. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Monmouth Partners Limited or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.

5. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

Expected output

INVOICE VALIDATION

1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.

2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:

a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues

b. Assist in business intelligence

3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.

4. Budget control of the CCG.

5. Support validating financial payments for contracted and non-contracted activity, determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient.

RISK STRATIFICATION

1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.

2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

CCGs will be able to:

3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.

4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.

5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.

6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.

7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.

8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.

9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.

11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.

12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.

13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.

14. Analyse based on specific diseases

- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.

- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.

RISK STRATIFICATION - Graphnet Healthcare Ltd

Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate

the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are

numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:-

 Patients at risk of emergency hospitalisation

 Probability of an extended stay in hospital

 Probability of a patient being high cost

 Probability of a patient having high pharmacy costs.

The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender,

pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity.

COMMISSIONING

1. Commissioner reporting:

a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).

b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.

c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.

d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.

e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.

f. Provider reporting.

g. Statutory returns.

h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.

i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.

j. Delayed discharges.

k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.

2. Readmissions analysis.

3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.

4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.

5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.

6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.

7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.

8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.

9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports

10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

11. Contract Management and Modelling

12. Patient Stratification, such as:

o Patients at highest risk of admission

o High cost activity uses (top 15%)

o Frail and elderly

o Patients that are currently in hospital

o Patients with most referrals to secondary care

o Patients with most emergency activity

o Patients with most expensive prescriptions

o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another

i. Discharged from hospital

ii. Discharged from community

13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.

14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.

15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.

16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.

17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.

18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.

19. Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand.

20. Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters.

21. Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals.

22. Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population

23. Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population

24. Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline.

25. Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts.

26. Identify medication prescribing trends and their effectiveness.

27. Linking prescribing habits to entry points into the health and social care system

28. Identify, quantify and understand cohorts of patient’s high numbers of different medications (polypharmacy)

29. Monitoring, at a population level, particular cohorts of service users and designing analytical models which support more effective interventions in health and adult social care

30. Monitoring service and integrated care outcomes across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care.

Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

The outputs, as part of the NHS England Wave 2 PHM national programme will identify patient cohorts and inequalities in outcome, spend and opportunity for further investigation, with a view to improving service delivery and patient health outcomes.

Wave 2 PHM will also begin to develop the CCG capability to undertake actuarial analysis of linked datasets from multiple care settings to develop further the understanding of the wider determinants of health across the population. All outputs will be delivered within the timescales of the contract between Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd and the CCG.

Expected measurable benefits

INVOICE VALIDATION

The invoice validation process supports the ongoing delivery of patient care across the NHS and the CCG region by:

1. Ensuring that activity is fully financially validated.

2. Ensuring that service providers are accurately paid for the patients treatment.

3. Enabling services to be planned, commissioned, managed, and subjected to financial control.

4. Enabling commissioners to confirm that they are paying appropriately for treatment of patients for whom they are responsible.

5. Fulfilling commissioners duties to fiscal probity and scrutiny.

6. Ensuring full financial accountability for relevant organisations.

7. Ensuring robust commissioning and performance management.

8. Ensuring commissioning objectives do not compromise patient confidentiality.

9. Ensuring the avoidance of misappropriation of public funds.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:

1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.

2. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services thus allowing early intervention.

3. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.

4. Supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework by allowing for more targeted intervention in primary care.

5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and healthcare outcomes

All of the above lead to improved patient experience And health outcomes through more effective commissioning of services.

RISK STRATIFICATION - GRAPHNET HEALTH CARE LTD

Although Graphnet are integrating the same algorithms as the South Central and West Integrated Population Analytics (SCW IPA) solution currently in use in Berkshire West, the implementation is different because:

• The primary data source used to feed the algorithms is updated much more regularly than the IPA system is. The data is fed from the CareCentric shared care record utilises near real time data flows in some cases.

• Rather than risk stratification being available in a separate standalone system, risk stratification scores will be available to view within the CareCentric application. This is a big bonus for clinicians who can open their clinical system and launch CareCentric from within it, accessing risk stratification reports without extra user logins and websites / applications.

• This application allows a clinician to access risk stratification scores for patients alongside further information from the shared care record, providing up to date information on events within primary care, secondary care, community care, mental health and social care. This supports better and more effective clinical decision making and again saves time for clinicians as they do not have to search through different systems to gather information on a patients care.

COMMISSIONING

1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.

a. Analysis to support full business cases.

b. Develop business models.

c. Monitor In year projects.

2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.

3. Health economic modelling using:

a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.

b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.

c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.

d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).

4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.

5. Enables monitoring of:

a. CCG outcome indicators.

b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity.

c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.

d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.

e. Case management.

f. Care service planning.

g. Commissioning and performance management.

h. List size verification by GP practices.

i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.

6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.

7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.

8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.

9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.

10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.

11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.

12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts

13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.

14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed.

15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice.

16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region.

17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years.

18. Allow reporting to drive changes and improve the quality of commissioned services and health outcomes for people.

19. Assists commissioners to make better decisions to support patients and drive changes in health care

20. Allows comparisons of providers performance to assist improvement in services – increase the quality

21. Allow analysis of health care provision to be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

22. To evaluate the impact of new services and innovations (e.g. if commissioners implement a new service or type of procedure with a provider, they can evaluate whether it improves outcomes for patients compared to the previous one).

23. Monitoring of entire population, as a pose to only those that engage with services

24. Enable Commissioners to be able to see early indications of potential practice resilience issues in that an early warning marker can often be a trend of patients re-registering themselves at a neighbouring practice.

25. Monitor the quality and safety of the delivery of healthcare services.

26. Allow focused commissioning support based on factual data rather than assumed and projected sources

27. Understand admissions linked to overprescribing.

28. Add value to the population health management workstream by adding prescribing data into linked dataset for segmentation and stratification.

29. Developing, through evaluation of person-level data, more effective prevention strategies and interventions across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care

30. Designing and implementing new payment models across health and adult social care

31. Understanding current and future population needs and resource utilisation for local strategic planning and commissioning purposes including for health, social care and public health needs.

Monmouth Partners Ltd

– to provide the CCG with intelligence regarding patterns of prescribing and surgical activity within gynaecology.

Benefits reported so far

The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the provided data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs.

Listed below is a number of further yielded benefits for commissioning;

1. Monitoring In year projects

2. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients

3. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.

4. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.

5. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.

The CCG will look to build on the yielded benefits of commissioning services that meet the needs of their local population, and that are effective in their delivery. The CCG will use intelligence to add insight to strategic commissioning and service integration across the CCG Area. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population within the CCG Area.

The continued access to this data will enable the CCG to further understand and improve service performance and delivery, including patient pathway design, re-design and patient experience.

Datasets on the latest version

Legal basis for provision: Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'; Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'; Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'.

Datasets approved under DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v8.2
DatasetType of dataSensitivity FrequencyConfidential data
Acute-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Adult Social Care Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Children and Young People Health Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Civil Registration - Births Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Civil Registrations of Death Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Community Services Data Set (CSDS) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Community-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
e-Referral Service for Commissioning Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5 Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Maternity Services Data Set Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
National Diabetes Audit Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Personal Demographic Service Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Personal Demographic Service Identifiable Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Population Data-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
SUS for Commissioners Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
SUS for Commissioners Identifiable Sensitive Frequent Adhoc Flow Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)

Files released

Files released counts only files released externally by DARS. Access granted in NHS England's own systems, such as its Secure Data Environment, is not included.

No files recorded as released under this agreement.

Version history

The register lists each renewal of this agreement as a separate row. This site has 7 versions — earlier versions existed before this site's records begin.

DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v8.2 14 August 2021 to 13 August 2024
Title
DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV
Commercial
No
Sublicensing
No
Datasets
32
Files released
0

Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Adult Social Care; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; e-Referral Service for Commissioning; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); National Diabetes Audit; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); Personal Demographic Service; Personal Demographic Service; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI); SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners

What changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v7.2

Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.

Fields changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v7.2
FieldWasBecame
Start date2020-10-072021-08-14
End date2023-10-062024-08-13
Personal Demographic Service: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'; Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7)
Personal Demographic Service: type of dataAnonymised - ICO Code CompliantAnonymised - ICO Code Compliant; Identifiable

Datasets: + Adult Social Care

Objective for processing

[2 paragraphs unchanged] Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG [13 words unchanged] responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) and Personal Demographic (PDS) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ and PDS data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number and is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further. determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient. [4 paragraphs unchanged] To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, (SUS+), identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care [49 words unchanged] also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care. [40 paragraphs unchanged] - Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI (SHMI) - Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) - Adult Social Care Data Processing of the Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) dataset is only permitted to provide intelligence about the safety and effectiveness of medicines, as specified by the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) Medicines Data Directions 2019. [4 paragraphs unchanged] · Using value as the redesign principle [9 paragraphs unchanged] - Support measuring the health, mortality or care needs of the total local population population.  Allow analysis of patient pathways across healthcare and social care. [6 paragraphs unchanged]

Processing activities

[9 paragraphs unchanged] The only identifier available in the data set is the NHS numbers. Any further [14 words unchanged] own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship. [1 paragraph unchanged] Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data. There is no requirement for the analytical teams to re-identify patients, but in the development of cohorts of patients considered to be at risk, the data controllers may need the facility to provide identifiable results back to direct healthcare professionals or local authority direct care staff only for the purpose of direct care. All re-id requests will be processed and authorised by the DSCRO on a case by case basis. National data opt outs are not applied in these cases as they are for the purposes of direct care which follows the legal basis of implied consent. An example of a request for the re-id of patients for direct care may be; A&E High Attendance usage The CCG can filter data to show for example the number of A&E attendances in a given period for each patient. The CCG can then flag to the relevant GP of the patient any patients that require intervention. An outcome of this is earlier intervention in the patient(s) care thus potentially reducing future costs and minimising future risk. Polypharmacy re-IDs CCG's can request re-ID of a list of patients to be sent to the relevant GP with a high number of medications (ingredient count) and review the medication for these patients. This can help address the risk of polypharmacy which is recognised as an adverse risk factor for patient safety. A by-product of such reviews may be to reduce costs of medication. The Re-identification process for direct care is as follows: 1. The CCG identifies a patient cohort (typically small numbers) to be re-identified for the purpose of direct care. 2. The CCG sends a re-id request to the DSCRO. This may be done through the CCG or CSU’s Business Intelligence (BI) Tool, or through a manual form. 3. The DSCRO (either through an automated system or manual checking in line with the request) assesses as to whether the request passes the specified re-identification process checks. Checks include if the requester is authorised to access identifiable data, if the number of patients in the cohort is appropriate, and that the request does not seem inappropriate or outside of expected parameters, including for example around timings and the requestor’s relationship with patients in the data 4. If successful/approved, the DSCRO re-identifies the relevant data item(s) for the appropriate patients and returns the identifiable fields to Health or care professional(s) with a legitimate relationship to the patient. The CCG does not see the identifiable record. 5. DSCROs retain an audit trail of all re-id requests 6. National Data opt outs are not applied for the purpose of direct care [28 paragraphs unchanged] 1. Identifiable SUS+ and PDS Data is obtained from the SUS+ and PDS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ and PDS data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. [2 paragraphs unchanged] a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and PDS and/or provider backing flow data. [7 paragraphs unchanged] 2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the [14 words unchanged] to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, who securely hold the SUS+ data. SUS+. [1 paragraph unchanged] 4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor. [3 paragraphs unchanged] 1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). [38 paragraphs unchanged] 19. Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) 20. Adult Social Care Data [2 paragraphs unchanged] 1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), [32 words unchanged] Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and (NDA), Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (PROMs), e-Referral Service (eRS), Personal Demographics Service (PDS) and (PDS), Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) (SHMI), Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) and Adult Social Care data only is held until points 2-8 are completed. securely transferred from the DSCRO to NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. [28 paragraphs unchanged] 9. The DSCRO then pass the pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental [50 words unchanged] and Patient Reported outcomes Measures (PROMs) e-Referral Service (eRS), Personal Demographics Service (PDS) and (PDS), Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) (SHMI), Medicines Dispensed in Primary Care (NHSBSA Data) and Adult Social Care data only securely to NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis. [54 paragraphs unchanged]

Expected output

[7 paragraphs unchanged] 5. Support validating financial payments for contracted and non-contracted activity, determining if the CCG is the responsible commissioner for the patient. [16 paragraphs unchanged] In addition: [49 paragraphs unchanged] 16. Understanding where patients patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust. [8 paragraphs unchanged] 25. Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts trusts. 26. Identify medication prescribing trends and their effectiveness. 27. Linking prescribing habits to entry points into the health and social care system 28. Identify, quantify and understand cohorts of patient’s high numbers of different medications (polypharmacy) 29. Monitoring, at a population level, particular cohorts of service users and designing analytical models which support more effective interventions in health and adult social care 30. Monitoring service and integrated care outcomes across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care. [3 paragraphs unchanged]

Expected measurable benefits

[48 paragraphs unchanged] 8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency re-admissions, readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care. [8 paragraphs unchanged] 17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years years. [9 paragraphs unchanged] 27. Understand admissions linked to overprescribing. 28. Add value to the population health management workstream by adding prescribing data into linked dataset for segmentation and stratification. 29. Developing, through evaluation of person-level data, more effective prevention strategies and interventions across a pathway or care setting involving adult social care 30. Designing and implementing new payment models across health and adult social care 31. Understanding current and future population needs and resource utilisation for local strategic planning and commissioning purposes including for health, social care and public health needs. [2 paragraphs unchanged]

Benefits reported

The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the viable evaluation provided data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population. Listed below is a number of further yielded benefits for commissioning; 1. Monitoring In year projects 2. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients 3. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. 4. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics. 5. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities. The CCG will look to build on the yielded benefits of commissioning services that meet the needs of their local population, and that are effective in their delivery. The CCG will use intelligence to add insight to strategic commissioning and service integration across the CCG Area. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population within the CCG Area. The continued access to this data will enable the CCG to further understand and improve service performance and delivery, including patient pathway design, re-design and patient experience.

DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v7.2 7 October 2020 to 6 October 2023
Title
DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV
Commercial
No
Sublicensing
No
Datasets
30
Files released
0

Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; e-Referral Service for Commissioning; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); National Diabetes Audit; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); Personal Demographic Service; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI); SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners

What changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v6.2

Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.

Fields changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v6.2
FieldWasBecame
Start date2020-06-012020-10-07
End date2023-05-312023-10-06
Acute-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Children and Young People Health: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Civil Registration - Births: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Civil Registrations of Death: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Community Services Data Set (CSDS): legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Community-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID): legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set_v1.5: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Maternity Services Data Set v1.5: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS): legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS): legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS): legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Mental Health-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS): legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
National Diabetes Audit: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Population Data-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii)Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'
SUS for Commissioners: legal basisHealth and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(2)(b)(ii); Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'.Health and Social Care Act 2012 - s261 - 'Other dissemination of information'; Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7); National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'.

Datasets: + Personal Demographic Service; + Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI); + e-Referral Service for Commissioning

Objective for processing

[2 paragraphs unchanged] Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further. for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further. [2 paragraphs unchanged] Risk Stratification Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes. To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care. Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited. [6 paragraphs unchanged] Risk Stratification Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes. To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care. Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited. [1 paragraph unchanged] To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area. both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers. population within the CCG area. The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers. [28 paragraphs unchanged] The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes: -- e-Referral Service (eRS) Population health management: - Personal Demographics Service (PDS) ͻUnderstanding the interdependency of care services - Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI ͻTargeting care more effectively The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes: ͻUsing value as the redesign principle -Population health management: Data Quality and Validation ʹallowing data quality checks on the submitted data · Understanding the interdependency of care services Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and · Targeting care more effectively where they need them · Using value as the redesign principle Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better -Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data understand and manage those needs - Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the - Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs - Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated - Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another changes in one service may affect flows through another - Service redesign Service redesign - Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population Health Needs Assessment ʹidentification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population - Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight cohorts of patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other -Demand Management - to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and support the secondary care system in ensuring enough capacity to manage the demand. avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and - Support measuring the health, mortality or care needs of the total local population identification of future service delivery models The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd & Monmouth Partners Ltd of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave 2 Population Health Management CCG. NHS England has contracted Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd to work with selected CCGs to undertake population health and actuarial analysis to build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for this project will be destroyed within 6 months of completion of the project and permissions as a data processor for this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment. Optum Health Solutions (IK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project Monmouth Partners Ltd NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave 2 Population Health Management CCG. NHS England has contracted Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd to work with selected CCGs to undertake population health and actuarial analysis to build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. The NHS Berkshire West CCG involvement is for 20 weeks, anticipated to start in March 2020 for approximately 20 weeks. Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for this project will be destroyed within 6 months of completion of the project and permissions as a data processor the this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment. The CCG has appointed Monmouth Partners Ltd to review gynaecology activity to support the CCGs Quality Team.

Processing activities

[30 paragraphs unchanged] Microsoft Limited supply Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd and North East London Commissioning Support Unit and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. in addition to the dissemination of Cancer Waiting Times Data via the DSCRO, the CCG is able to access reports held within the CWT system in NHS Digital directly. Access within the CCG is limited to those with a need to process the data for the purposes described in this agreement. A CCG user will be able to access the provider extracts from the portal for any provider where at least 1 patient for whom they are the registered CCG for that individuals GP practice appears in that setting Although a CCG user may have access to pseudonymised patient information not related to that CCG, users should only process and analyse data for which they have a legitimate relationship (as described within Data Minimisation). Microsoft Limited supply Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd, South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, Optum Health Solutions UK Limited and North and East London Commissioning Support Unit and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. Amazon Web Services supply Cloud Services for Optum Health Solutions UK Limited and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database containing the data. [1 paragraph unchanged] ANS Group will be assisting in the set up and management of the South, Central and West CSU Microsoft Azure Cloud and are therefore listed as a data processor. They will not have any additional processing / storage addresses (as these will be the Microsoft Azure addresses). Using the data for any other purpose would be considered a breach of this agreement. ATOS Healthcare (part of ATOS IT Services UK Limited) will be providing South, Central and West CSU with staff resource and subject matter expertise to assist in the delivery of products and services. Named individuals will have access to pseudonymised patient level data via South, Central and West CSU servers and secure logins. No data will leave South, Central and West CSU, and therefore no processing and storage addresses are listed. [19 paragraphs unchanged] Risk Stratification - Data Processor 3 2 - Graphnet Health Limited [36 paragraphs unchanged] 16. e-Referral Service (eRS) 17. Personal Demographics Service (PDS) 18. Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) [2 paragraphs unchanged] 1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), [39 words unchanged] and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) e-Referral Service (eRS), Personal Demographics Service (PDS) and Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) data only is held until points 2-8 are completed. [5 paragraphs unchanged] o This individual has access to a black box. The pseudonymised data is passed trough through the black box process where the pseudonymisation is mapped to the pseudonymisation used by the DSCRO. [22 paragraphs unchanged] 9. The DSCRO then pass the pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental [44 words unchanged] and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported outcomes Measures (PROMs) e-Referral Service (eRS), Personal Demographics Service (PDS) and Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) data only securely to NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis. [41 paragraphs unchanged] Data Processor 4 - Monmouth Partners Limited 1. Pseudonymised SUS+ and Local Provider data is transferred securely from NHS South, Central and West CSU or NHS Berkshire West CCG to Monmouth Partners Limited. 2. Monmouth Partners Limited provide analysis to: a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers c. Undertake population health management d. Undertake data quality and validation checks e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments 3. Monmouth Partners Limited then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 4. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Monmouth Partners Limited or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 5. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

Expected output

[76 paragraphs unchanged] 19. Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand. 20. Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters. 21. Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals. 22. Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population 23. Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population 24. Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline. 25. Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts [3 paragraphs unchanged]

Expected measurable benefits

[18 paragraphs unchanged] All of the above lead to improved patient experience And health outcomes through more effective commissioning of services. [39 paragraphs unchanged] 18. Allow reporting to drive changes and improve the quality of commissioned services and health outcomes for people. 19. Assists commissioners to make better decisions to support patients and drive changes in health care 20. Allows comparisons of providers performance to assist improvement in services – increase the quality 21. Allow analysis of health care provision to be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. 22. To evaluate the impact of new services and innovations (e.g. if commissioners implement a new service or type of procedure with a provider, they can evaluate whether it improves outcomes for patients compared to the previous one). 23. Monitoring of entire population, as a pose to only those that engage with services 24. Enable Commissioners to be able to see early indications of potential practice resilience issues in that an early warning marker can often be a trend of patients re-registering themselves at a neighbouring practice. 25. Monitor the quality and safety of the delivery of healthcare services. 26. Allow focused commissioning support based on factual data rather than assumed and projected sources Monmouth Partners Ltd – to provide the CCG with intelligence regarding patterns of prescribing and surgical activity within gynaecology.

Unchanged: Benefits reported.

Objective for processing

Invoice Validation

Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.

Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.

The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.

Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.

To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.

Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited.

Graphnet Healthcare Ltd

The processing is not excessive or parallel as the platform through which the risk stratification is deployed is different to the way the SCW CSU solution is deployed and created due to:-

• The Graphnet risk stratification solution works with near real time updates from primary care providing scores which are based on more up to date data set.

• It provides better decision making capability for GP’s, allowing them to access a wider set of information alongside the stratified data set (e.g. accessing social care, community and mental health pages within the shared cared record)

• The GP’s can access the shared care record risk stratification information from within the EMIS clinical solution allowing GP’s to access risk stratification information seamlessly.

When the solution is live, the CCG will look to consolidate the use of different solutions.

Commissioning

To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:

- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)

- Local Provider Flows

o Acute

o Ambulance

o Community

o Demand for Service

o Diagnostic Service

o Emergency Care

o Experience, Quality and Outcomes

o Mental Health

o Other Not Elsewhere Classified

o Population Data

o Primary Care Services

o Public Health Screening

- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)

- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)

- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)

- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)

- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)

- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)

- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)

- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)

- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)

- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

-- e-Referral Service (eRS)

- Personal Demographics Service (PDS)

- Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI

The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:

-Population health management:

· Understanding the interdependency of care services

· Targeting care more effectively

· Using value as the redesign principle

-Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

- Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them

- Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs

- Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated

- Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another

- Service redesign

- Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population

- Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight cohorts of patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models

-Demand Management - to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and support the secondary care system in ensuring enough capacity to manage the demand.

- Support measuring the health, mortality or care needs of the total local population

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd & Monmouth Partners Ltd

Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave 2 Population Health Management CCG. NHS England has contracted Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd to work with selected CCGs to undertake population health and actuarial analysis to build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for this project will be destroyed within 6 months of completion of the project and permissions as a data processor for this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment.

Monmouth Partners Ltd

The CCG has appointed Monmouth Partners Ltd to review gynaecology activity to support the CCGs Quality Team.

Expected output

INVOICE VALIDATION

1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.

2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:

a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues

b. Assist in business intelligence

3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.

4. Budget control of the CCG.

RISK STRATIFICATION

1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.

2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

CCGs will be able to:

3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.

4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.

5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.

6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.

7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.

8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.

9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.

11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.

12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.

13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.

14. Analyse based on specific diseases

In addition:

- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.

- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.

RISK STRATIFICATION - Graphnet Healthcare Ltd

Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate

the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are

numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:-

 Patients at risk of emergency hospitalisation

 Probability of an extended stay in hospital

 Probability of a patient being high cost

 Probability of a patient having high pharmacy costs.

The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender,

pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity.

COMMISSIONING

1. Commissioner reporting:

a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).

b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.

c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.

d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.

e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.

f. Provider reporting.

g. Statutory returns.

h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.

i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.

j. Delayed discharges.

k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.

2. Readmissions analysis.

3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.

4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.

5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.

6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.

7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.

8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.

9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports

10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

11. Contract Management and Modelling

12. Patient Stratification, such as:

o Patients at highest risk of admission

o High cost activity uses (top 15%)

o Frail and elderly

o Patients that are currently in hospital

o Patients with most referrals to secondary care

o Patients with most emergency activity

o Patients with most expensive prescriptions

o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another

i. Discharged from hospital

ii. Discharged from community

13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.

14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.

15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.

16. Understanding where patients are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.

17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.

18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.

19. Manage demand, by understanding the quantity of assessments required CCGs are able to improve the care service for patients by predicting the impact on certain care pathways and ensure the secondary care system has enough capacity to manage the demand.

20. Monitor the timing of key actions relating to referral letters. CCG’s are unable to see the contents of the referral letters.

21. Identify low priority procedures which could be directed to community-based alternatives and as such commission these services and deflect referrals for low priority procedures resulting in a reduction in hospital referrals.

22. Allow Commissioners to better protect or improve the public health of the total local patient population

23. Allow Commissioners to plan, evaluate and monitor health and social care policies, services, or interventions for the total local patient population

24. Allow Commissioners to compare their providers (trusts) mortality outcomes to the national baseline.

25. Investigate mortality outcomes for trusts

Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

The outputs, as part of the NHS England Wave 2 PHM national programme will identify patient cohorts and inequalities in outcome, spend and opportunity for further investigation, with a view to improving service delivery and patient health outcomes.

Wave 2 PHM will also begin to develop the CCG capability to undertake actuarial analysis of linked datasets from multiple care settings to develop further the understanding of the wider determinants of health across the population. All outputs will be delivered within the timescales of the contract between Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd and the CCG.

Benefits reported

The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the viable evaluation data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population.

DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v6.2 1 June 2020 to 31 May 2023
Title
DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV
Commercial
No
Sublicensing
No
Datasets
27
Files released
0

Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); National Diabetes Audit; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners

What changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v5.2

Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.

Fields changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v5.2
FieldWasBecame
Start date2020-02-122020-06-01
End date2023-02-112023-05-31

Objective for processing

[2 paragraphs unchanged] Providers submit invoices to the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG), so the CCG is able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further. Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further. The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not. Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit Graphnet Healthcare Ltd The processing is not excessive or parallel as the platform through which the risk stratification is deployed is different to the way the SCW CSU solution is deployed and created due to:- • The Graphnet risk stratification solution works with near real time updates from primary care providing scores which are based on more up to date data set. • It provides better decision making capability for GP’s, allowing them to access a wider set of information alongside the stratified data set (e.g. accessing social care, community and mental health pages within the shared cared record) • The GP’s can access the shared care record risk stratification information from within the EMIS clinical solution allowing GP’s to access risk stratification information seamlessly. When the solution is live, the CCG will look to consolidate the use of different solutions. [1 paragraph unchanged] Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes. To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care. multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes. To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care. Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited. [1 paragraph unchanged] Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) were established as part of the Health and Social Care Act in 2012 and are responsible for the commissioning of health care services across England. To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) have a statutory responsibility for commissioning most NHS services and are responsible for approximately 2/3 of the total NHS budget. Increasingly they are also involved in commissioning primary care and some specialised services. both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the CCGs are groups of local GP practices whose governing bodies include GPs, others clinicians such as nurses and secondary care consultants, patient representatives, general managers and – in some cases – practice managers and local authority representatives. population within the CCG area. CCGs have both statutory duties and statutory powers in relation to commissioning healthcare services including but not limited to: The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories o Community health services requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers. o Maternity services The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services: o Elective hospital care - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) o Rehabilitation services - Local Provider Flows o Accident & Emergency o Acute o Ambulance services o Out-of-hours services Community o Older people’s healthcare services o Demand for Service o Healthcare services for children o Diagnostic Service o Healthcare services for people with mental health conditions o Emergency Care o Healthcare services for people with learning disabilities o Experience, Quality and Outcomes o Continuing healthcare o Mental Health o Abortion services o Other Not Elsewhere Classified o Infertility services o Population Data o Wheelchair services o Primary Care Services o Home oxygen services o Public Health Screening o Treatment of infectious diseases - Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) CCGs statutory duties and power are defined within the Health and Social Care Act 2012. - Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) Data is required to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services and meet the CCGs duties and powers. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area. - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers. - Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) The data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. - Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) The overarching objectives of the CCG and use of these data is to: - Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) - Promote accountability and service improvements locally - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - Ensure value for money is achieved - Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) - Fulfil statutory functions - National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) - Promote population health management by - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) a. Understanding the interdependency of care services - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) b. Targeting care more effectively - National Diabetes Audit (NDA) c. Using value as the redesign principle - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) d. Promoting interoperability across care pathways The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes: e. Investigating the needs of the population Population health management: - Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk and managing needs ͻUnderstanding the interdependency of care services - Stratify patients by highlighting those patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls. ͻTargeting care more effectively - Identifying gaps in service and where individuals may slip through the net. ͻUsing value as the redesign principle - Identifying duplications in service provision. Data Quality and Validation ʹallowing data quality checks on the submitted data - Identifying of underlying disease prevalence with the local population through Health Needs Assessments. Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and The data will further be used for quality and validation purposes, to allow quality checks on the submitted data and to aid in the redesign of services throughout the local region. where they need them Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another Service redesign Health Needs Assessment ʹidentification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd [1 paragraph unchanged] NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave [27 words unchanged] build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. The Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd NHS Berkshire West CCG involvement is for 20 weeks, anticipated to start in March 2020 for [30 words unchanged] processor the this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment.

Processing activities

DATA The following datasets are released by NHS Digital to the controllership of the CCG: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) - Local Provider Flows o Acute o Ambulance o Community o Demand for Service o Diagnostic Service o Emergency Care o Experience, Quality and Outcomes o Mental Health o Other Not Elsewhere Classified o Population Data o Primary Care Services o Public Health Screening - Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) - Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) - Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) - Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) - Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) - National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) - National Diabetes Audit (NDA) - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) IDENTIFIABILITY SUS+ data identifiable only at the level of NHS number may be released by NHS Digital to the nominated Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) for the CCG for the purpose of Invoice Validation. SUS+ data identifiable only at the level of NHS number may be released by NHS Digital to the approved Risk Stratification provider for the CCG for the purpose of Risk Stratification. All data released by NHS Digital used for the purpose of commissioning is pseudonymised prior to release by NHS Digital. LINKAGE The following linkage is permitted: - SUS+ data identifiable at the level of NHS number is permitted to be linked with backing data only for the purpose of Invoice Validation. Backing data is a specified data set, detail of which is included in the ‘Who Pays? Information Governance Advice for Invoice Validation’ published by NHS England. The data set is in line with the Section 251, CAG 7-07(a)/2013, CAG 7-07(b)/2013 and CAG 7-07(c)/2013, approval. - SUS+ data identifiable at the level of NHS number is permitted to be linked with GP data only for the purpose of Risk Stratification. - Any pseudonymised data sets released by NHS Digital for the purpose of commissioning may be linked to another pseudonymised data set released by NHS Digital, only where both datasets are contained within this agreement. - Any combination of pseudonymised data set released by NHS Digital for the purpose of commissioning, under this agreement may be linked to GP and Social Care data only where the GP and Social Care data has been consistently pseudonymised by an NHS Digital approved method. PROCESSORS The following data processor is the nominated Controlled Environment for Finance and can access the following data for the purpose of Invoice Validation: NHS South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) The following data processors can access the following data for the purpose of Risk Stratification: NHS South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Healthcare Limited: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) The following data processors can access the following data for the purpose of commissioning: NHS South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) - Local Provider Flows o Acute o Ambulance o Community o Demand for Service o Diagnostic Service o Emergency Care o Experience, Quality and Outcomes o Mental Health o Other Not Elsewhere Classified o Population Data o Primary Care Services o Public Health Screening - Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) - Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) - Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) - Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) - Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) - National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) - National Diabetes Audit (NDA) - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Optum Health Solutions: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) - Local Provider Flows o Acute o Ambulance o Community o Demand for Service o Diagnostic Service o Emergency Care o Experience, Quality and Outcomes o Mental Health o Other Not Elsewhere Classified o Population Data o Primary Care Services o Public Health Screening - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) - only for the NHSE PHM Project - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - only for the NHSE PHM Project PROCESSING PURPOSES Invoice Validation: The following processing purposes are permitted under this agreement: a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and/or provider backing flow data. b. Checking against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are: i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area. iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance. c. Reviewing retrospective payments to identify overpayments, duplications and missing payments The CEfF inform the CCG: - Of any invoices that have been validated may be paid - Of any duplications, overpayments or missing payments The CEfF will investigate any discrepancies or non-validated invoices directly with the provider on behalf of the CCG. The CCG will receive a notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received, pending and processed. The CEfF are permitted to make pseudonymised data available to the CCG. Risk Stratification: The following processing purposes are permitted under this agreement: - Processing of data to calculate a risk score and profile - Support of case finding - GP reporting - Production of GP dashboards - Statistical and predictive modelling Commissioning: The following processing purposes are permitted under this agreement: - Population health management: o Understanding the interdependency of care services o Targeting care more effectively o Using value as the redesign principle o Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated - Data Quality and Validation o Allowing data quality and validation checks on the submitted data o Checking recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers - Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them - Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models. - Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs - See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning. - Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population. - Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another DATA MINIMISATION Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied - Invoice Validation: Only data related to patients who are resident or registered within the CCG region may be released and processed for the named purposes within the agreement. Risk Stratification: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Berkshire West CCG region (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner Commissioning: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Berkshire West CCG region (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner). and/or • Patients treated by a provider where NHS Berkshire West CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. and/or • Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Berkshire West CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. Further minimisation of data before release is permitted and should be agreed by the Data Controller and NHS Digital production. ONWARD SHARING No identifiable data should be released by the CEfF. Patient level data is not permitted to be share outside of the CCG. Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set. SEGREGATION: Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital. Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors. RESTRICTIONS [5 paragraphs unchanged] NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract i.e.: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data) The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data. Microsoft UK supply provide Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data) University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. Nominated CEfFs should be listed on the NHS England List of Controlled Environment for Finance Organisations. It is the data controller’s responsibility to ensure the CEfF has submitted a Controlled Environments for Finance compliance statement to NHS England. [2 paragraphs unchanged] The only identifier available in the data set (for Risk Stratification ) is the NHS numbers. Any further identification of the patients will only [8 words unchanged] own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship. Onward Sharing Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data. Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set. Segregation Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. Data will be held separately from that for the purpose of direct care. Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital. Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors. Data Minimisation Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied - For the purpose of Commissioning: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Berkshire West CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner). and/or • Patients treated by a provider where NHS Berkshire West CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. and/or • Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Berkshire West CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. For the purpose of Risk Stratification: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within NHS Berkshire West CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner For the purpose of Invoice Validation: • CCG of residence and/or registration. Microsoft Limited supply Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd and North East London Commissioning Support Unit and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. Interxion and Ark Data Centres do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. Invoice Validation - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit 1. Identifiable SUS+ Data is obtained from the SUS+ Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. 3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider. 4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes: a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and/or provider backing flow data. b. Once the provider backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are: i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area. iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance. 5. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit CEfF team and the provider, meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc. RISK STRATIFICATION - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit 1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, who securely hold the SUS+ data. 3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. 4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor. 5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient. 6. Once South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG. Risk Stratification - Data Processor 3 - Graphnet Health Limited 1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to Graphnet Health Limited, who securely hold the SUS+ data. 3. Identifiable GP Data is sourced from the CareCentric Shared Care Record system held by Graphnet Health Limited. 4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification algorithm within the CareCentric system by the data processor. 5. GPs will have access to the risk stratification scores within the CareCentric system. Clinicians will open their clinical system and launch CareCentric from within it, to access risk stratification reports. 6. The application allows Clinicians (in this instance GPs) to access risk stratification scores for patients alongside further information from the Shared Care Record, providing up to date information on events within primary care, secondary care, community care, mental health and social care. This supports better and more effective clinical decision making and saves time for clinicians as they do not have to search through different systems to gather information on a patients care. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient. 7. Once Graphnet Health Limited has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG. Commissioning The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets: 1. SUS+ 2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers) a. Acute b. Ambulance c. Community d. Demand for Service e. Diagnostic Service f. Emergency Care g. Experience, Quality and Outcomes h. Mental Health i. Other Not Elsewhere Classified j. Population Data k. Primary Care Services l. Public Health Screening 3. Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) 4. Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) 5. Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) 6. Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) 7. Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) 8. Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) 9. Community Services Data Set (CSDS) 10. Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) 11. National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) 12. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) 13. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) 14. National Diabetes Audit (NDA) 15. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows: Data Processor 1 – NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit 1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) only is held until points 2-8 are completed. 2. NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit receives GP data. GP data is received as follows: o Identifiable GP data is submitted to NHS SCW CSU. o The identifiable data lands in a ring-fenced area for GP data only. o The GP data is pseudonymised using a pseudonymisation tool, different to that used by the DSCRO. o There is a Data Processing Agreement in place between the GP and NHS SCW CSU. A specific named individual within NHS SCW CSU acts on behalf of the GP. o This individual has access to a black box. The pseudonymised data is passed trough the black box process where the pseudonymisation is mapped to the pseudonymisation used by the DSCRO. o Once mapped, the data is passed into NHS SCW CSU, but before NHS SCW CSU will receive the data from the ring-fenced area, they require confirmation that the identifiable data has been deleted. o NHS SCW CSU are then sent the pseudonymised GP data with the pseudo algorithm specific to them. 3. NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit also receive a flow of social care data. Social care data is received in one of the following 2 ways: - Pseudonymised: o Social care data is pseudonymised within the provider using a pseudonymisation tool, different to that used by the DSCRO. The provider requests a pseudonymisation key from the DSCRO. The key can only be used once. The key is specific to the Local Authority and to that specific date. o The pseudonymised data lands in a ring-fenced area for social care data only. o There is a Data Processing Agreement in place between the Provider and NHS SCW CSU. A specific named individual within NHS SCW CSU acts on behalf of the provider. o This individual has access to a black box. The pseudonymised data is passed through the black box process where the pseudonymisation is mapped to the pseudonymisation used by the DSCRO. o The data is then passed into the non-ringfenced area with the pseudo algorithm specific to them. - Identifiable o Identifiable social care data is submitted to NHS SCW CSU. o The identifiable data lands in a ring-fenced area for social care data only. o The social care data is pseudonymised using a pseudonymisation tool, different to that used by the DSCRO. o There is a Data Processing Agreement in place between the Local Authority and NHS SCW CSU. A specific named individual within NHS SCW CSU acts on behalf of the provider. o This individual has access to a black box. The pseudonymised data is passed through the black box process where the pseudonymisation is mapped to the pseudonymisation used by the DSCRO. o Once mapped, the data is passed into NHS SCW CSU, but before NHS SCW CSU will receive the data from the ring-fenced area, they require confirmation that the identifiable data has been deleted. o NHS SCW CSU are then sent the pseudonymised social care data with the pseudo algorithm specific to them. 4. Once the pseudonymised GP data and social care data is received, NHS SCW CSU make a request to the DSCRO. 5. The DSCRO checks the dates of the key generation (see Points 2 and 3 above). 6. The DSCRO then send a mapping table to NHS SCW CSU. 7. NHS SCW CSU then overwrite the organisation specific keys with the DSCRO key. 8. The mapping table is then deleted. 9. The DSCRO then pass the pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young Peoples Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported outcomes Measures (PROMs) only securely to NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis. 10. Social Care Data and GP Data is then linked to the datasets listed within Point 9. NHS SCW CSU then analyse the data to do the following: a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers c. Undertake population health management d. Undertake data quality and validation checks e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments 11. NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 12. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 13. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set. Data Processor 2 – Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd 1) Pseudonymised SUS is securely transferred from SCW DSCRO to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd. 2) NEL DSCRO will receive and process Local Provider data for the London providers and disseminate the pseudonymised data to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd via the North East London Commissioning Support Unit SFTP process. 3) Data will be pseudonymised in such a way as to allow linkage between data in points (1) and (2) above. 4) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd add derived fields, link SUS fields and provide analysis to: o See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning (CCG). o Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers (CCG). o Undertake population health management o Undertake data quality and validation checks o Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population o Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk o Conduct Health Needs Assessments 5) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 6) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 7) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared. Data Processor 2 - Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - for the NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project 1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Mental Health Services Data Set, Community Services Data Set, Local Flow Provider Data, GP Primary Care data and Social Care data is securely transferred from NHS Berkshire West CCG to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd. The data is decoupled from the other national datasets and sent as individual data flows. 2. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd provide analysis to: o Whole population segmentation to assess population health needs o Prospective risk scoring for individuals to indicate the likelihood of future adverse events o Predictive modelling to determine individuals at risk and an understanding of the drivers of risk o Longitudinal analysis of intersegmental drift identifying individuals who move between complexity classifications and the drivers of these transitions o The production of individual-level theographs to identify gaps in care 3. Allowed linkage is between the datasets contained within point (1) above. GP and Social Care datasets are needed for the processing carried out by Optum to enhance the population health analytics beyond SUS+ and LPF's which contain only secondary care activity 4. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 5. Aggregated of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set. 7. Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd will only be in receipt of data specified in Point 1 and only be permitted to act as Data processors for the period specified in the NHS England contract with NHS Berkshire West CCG. 8. The NHS England / Optum contractual period with NHS Berkshire West CCG is anticipated to end in July / August 2020, at which point the data processor will be removed from this agreement by amendment. [1 paragraph unchanged]

Expected output

[7 paragraphs unchanged] 5. Identification and recovery of monies which would otherwise be lost 6. Assurances over the robustness of internal control mechanisms relating to the payment of invoices and/or suggested improvements [19 paragraphs unchanged] In addition, Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:- RISK STRATIFICATION - Graphnet Healthcare Ltd Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:- [4 paragraphs unchanged] The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender, pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity. pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity. [1 paragraph unchanged] CCGs produce a range of outputs to meet their objectives. These include but are not limited to: 1. Commissioner reporting: A. Reporting: a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD). In exercising its functions, the CCG must comply with the statutory duties set out in the NHS Act and/or any directions made by NHS England or the Secretary of State. As such, the CCG produce a variety of reports including but not limited to: b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD. a. Statutory returns (monthly/quarterly/yearly) c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD. b. Provider reports d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD. c. Patient Outcome Data reports e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD. d. Delayed discharge reports f. Provider reporting. e. Quality and performance reports g. Statutory returns. f. Business Intelligence reports – aggregate level h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return. g. Dashboard reports for GPs i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return. B. Readmissions: j. Delayed discharges. The CCG will provide analysis on readmissions which may include such things as: numbers of readmissions; discharge diagnosis; behavioural health comorbidity; days between discharge and readmission; high utilisers; considered target populations; readmission patterns. k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting. C. Projects and Programmes: 2. Readmissions analysis. CCGs undertake many projects and programmes. Using data provided, CCGs will produce project and programme level dashboards. 3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence. D. Patient Stratification: 4. Production of project / programme level dashboards. CCGs will investigate trends in those patients at highest risk. Risk may be defined in relation to the following: 5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix. - Admission 6. Clinical coding reviews / audits. - Readmission 7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level. - Use of multiple services 8. GP Practice level dashboard reports. - Referrals to secondary care 9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports - High cost services 10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data - High cost prescriptions 11. Contract Management and Modelling - Frail and elderly 12. Patient Stratification, such as: - Movement between services o Patients at highest risk of admission E. Reviews and Audits: o High cost activity uses (top 15%) Data will enable reviews and audits of clinical coding (the translation of medical terminology written by the clinician to describe the patient’s circumstances). o Frail and elderly F. Contract and Financial Management: o Patients that are currently in hospital Data will be used to manage CCG budgets and assist GPs, undertake validation checks, check recorded activity against contracts or invoices so that discussions can be facilitated between commissioners and contract providers. The ability to validate claims that are not being made after an individual has died. o Patients with most referrals to secondary care G. Population Health Management: o Patients with most emergency activity Data will be used to produced data tables and visualisation to be able to communicate information efficiently to users via statistical graphs, plots, information graphics and charts. Data can be used to produce dashboards. These mediums will enable: o Patients with most expensive prescriptions - Understanding of population and activity o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another - Grouping the population into patient segments based on demographic and clinical features i. Discharged from hospital - Monitoring of bespoke cohorts of patients e.g. frail elderly ii. Discharged from community - Understanding and forecasting costs at provider level 13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services. - Health needs assessment, for example, identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions, or combinations of conditions 14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die. - Population projections of Activity and Spend 15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support. - Actuarial projections of Activity and Spend 16. Understanding where patients are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust. - Analysis of intersegmental drift 17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports. - Production of Theographs 18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity. - Opportunity analysis based on prevalence of specific diseases - Developing business models The outputs will be in aggregate and patient level de-identified format. H. Monitoring: Outputs will include a variety of monitoring including, but not limited to: - Acute/community/mental health quality matrix - CCG outcome indicators - Financial and non-financial validation of activity - Multiple attendances - Case management - Contract monitoring - In-year project monitoring I. Benchmarking: The CCG are able to compare and contrast performance against similar CCGs. The CCG can provide feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual level (but only on data initially provided by the service provider) [3 paragraphs unchanged]

Expected measurable benefits

[3 paragraphs unchanged] 2. Ensuring that service providers are accurately paid for the patients’ patients treatment. [2 paragraphs unchanged] 5. Fulfilling commissioner’s commissioners duties to fiscal probity and scrutiny. [4 paragraphs unchanged] 10. Meeting commissioning objectives without compromising patient confidentiality [6 paragraphs unchanged] 5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and healthcare outcomes 6. healthcare outcomes [1 paragraph unchanged] In addition, although Graphnet are integrating the same algorithms as the South Central and West Integrated Population Analytics (SCW IPA) solution currently in use in Berkshire West, the implementation is different because: RISK STRATIFICATION - GRAPHNET HEALTH CARE LTD Although Graphnet are integrating the same algorithms as the South Central and West Integrated Population Analytics (SCW IPA) solution currently in use in Berkshire West, the implementation is different because: [4 paragraphs unchanged] In line with the Five Year Forward View, expected benefits include, but are not limited to: 1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways. A. Prevention: a. Analysis to support full business cases. 1. Earlier identification of patients on disease pathways. b. Develop business models. 2. Increase in attainment of individual health goals (for example: quitting smoking, increased level of exercise, healthier diet). c. Monitor In year projects. 3. Reduction in health-related unemployment and work absence. 2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types. 4. Reduction in incidence of preventable diseases. 3. Health economic modelling using: 5. Reduction in the number of premature deaths. a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets. B. Integrated Care: b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients. 6. Increase in co-operation between NHS services and voluntary sector. c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway. 7. Increase of out-of-hospital care. d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC). 8. Increase in patients accessing specialist advice where their disease pathway requires specialist support. 4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity. 9. Reduction in inappropriate admissions to hospitals. 5. Enables monitoring of: 10. Increase in patients receiving case management. a. CCG outcome indicators. 11. Increase in local understanding of where variation in the use of services occurs. b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity. C. Patient Empowerment: c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. 12. Increase in patient education and awareness relating to the management of their care d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions. 13. Increase in the activation of patients in the management of their individual healthcare e. Case management. D. Community Engagement: f. Care service planning. 14. Increase in democratic leadership on public health. g. Commissioning and performance management. 15. Reduction in pressures on carers. h. List size verification by GP practices. 16. Increase in volunteers from local communities. i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes. E. Value for Money: 6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers. 17. Reduction in low value treatments. 7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these. 18. Reduction in costs of a treatment. 8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency re-admissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care. 19. Reduction in costly treatments arising from prevented illness. 9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required. 20. Reduction in management and administration costs. 10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework. 21. Increase in staff satisfaction, recruitment and retention. 11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics. F. Other: 12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts 22. Reduction in inconsistency in approaches to data use. 13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities. 23. Enhancing the quality of life for people with long-term conditions 14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed. 24. Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or following injury 15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice. 25. Ensuring people have a positive experience of care 16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region. 26. Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm 17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years 27. Support of: a. Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) b. Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) 28. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. 29. Grouping and re-costing of previous activity. 30. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics. 31. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts. 32. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.

Benefits reported

Not stated in the previous version; added here.

The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the viable evaluation data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population.

Objective for processing

Invoice Validation

Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.

Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed

for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which

is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS

number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be

used further.

The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.

Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Graphnet Healthcare Ltd

The processing is not excessive or parallel as the platform through which the risk stratification is deployed is different to the way the SCW CSU solution is deployed and created due to:-

• The Graphnet risk stratification solution works with near real time updates from primary care providing scores which are based on more up to date data set.

• It provides better decision making capability for GP’s, allowing them to access a wider set of information alongside the stratified data set (e.g. accessing social care, community and mental health pages within the shared cared record)

• The GP’s can access the shared care record risk stratification information from within the EMIS clinical solution allowing GP’s to access risk stratification information seamlessly.

When the solution is live, the CCG will look to consolidate the use of different solutions.

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using

multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse

outcomes.

To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with

Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future

demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners

can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General

Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.

Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited.

Commissioning

To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing

both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the

population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories

requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:

- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)

- Local Provider Flows

o Acute

o Ambulance

o Community

o Demand for Service

o Diagnostic Service

o Emergency Care

o Experience, Quality and Outcomes

o Mental Health

o Other Not Elsewhere Classified

o Population Data

o Primary Care Services

o Public Health Screening

- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)

- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)

- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)

- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)

- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)

- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)

- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)

- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)

- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)

- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes:

Population health management:

ͻUnderstanding the interdependency of care services

ͻTargeting care more effectively

ͻUsing value as the redesign principle

Data Quality and Validation ʹallowing data quality checks on the submitted data

Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and

where they need them

Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better

understand and manage those needs

Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the

provision of care may be being duplicated

Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how

changes in one service may affect flows through another

Service redesign

Health Needs Assessment ʹidentification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population

Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other

avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and

identification of future service delivery models

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs

of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd

Optum Health Solutions (IK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave 2 Population Health Management CCG. NHS England has contracted Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd to work with selected CCGs to undertake population health and actuarial analysis to build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. The NHS Berkshire West CCG involvement is for 20 weeks, anticipated to start in March 2020 for approximately 20 weeks. Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for this project will be destroyed within 6 months of completion of the project and permissions as a data processor the this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment.

Expected output

INVOICE VALIDATION

1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.

2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:

a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues

b. Assist in business intelligence

3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.

4. Budget control of the CCG.

RISK STRATIFICATION

1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.

2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

CCGs will be able to:

3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.

4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.

5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.

6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.

7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.

8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.

9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.

11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.

12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.

13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.

14. Analyse based on specific diseases

In addition:

- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.

- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.

RISK STRATIFICATION - Graphnet Healthcare Ltd

Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate

the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are

numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:-

 Patients at risk of emergency hospitalisation

 Probability of an extended stay in hospital

 Probability of a patient being high cost

 Probability of a patient having high pharmacy costs.

The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender,

pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity.

COMMISSIONING

1. Commissioner reporting:

a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).

b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.

c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.

d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.

e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.

f. Provider reporting.

g. Statutory returns.

h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.

i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.

j. Delayed discharges.

k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.

2. Readmissions analysis.

3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.

4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.

5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.

6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.

7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.

8. GP Practice level dashboard reports.

9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports

10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

11. Contract Management and Modelling

12. Patient Stratification, such as:

o Patients at highest risk of admission

o High cost activity uses (top 15%)

o Frail and elderly

o Patients that are currently in hospital

o Patients with most referrals to secondary care

o Patients with most emergency activity

o Patients with most expensive prescriptions

o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another

i. Discharged from hospital

ii. Discharged from community

13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.

14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.

15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.

16. Understanding where patients are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.

17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.

18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.

Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

The outputs, as part of the NHS England Wave 2 PHM national programme will identify patient cohorts and inequalities in outcome, spend and opportunity for further investigation, with a view to improving service delivery and patient health outcomes.

Wave 2 PHM will also begin to develop the CCG capability to undertake actuarial analysis of linked datasets from multiple care settings to develop further the understanding of the wider determinants of health across the population. All outputs will be delivered within the timescales of the contract between Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd and the CCG.

Benefits reported

The CCG has realised the measurable benefits for the data collection and the viable evaluation data has enabled services to be delivered to match the population requirements whilst planning for future needs. This work will continue year on year to match the delivery/funding of targets services for the population.

DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v5.2 12 February 2020 to 11 February 2023
Title
DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV
Commercial
No
Sublicensing
No
Datasets
27
Files released
0

Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); National Diabetes Audit; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners

What changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v4.2

Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.

Fields changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v4.2
FieldWasBecame
Start date2019-10-232020-02-12
End date2022-10-222023-02-11

Objective for processing

[2 paragraphs unchanged] Invoices are submitted Providers submit invoices to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Groups (CCG), so the CCG are is able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their [45 words unchanged] of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further. The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not. Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit [3 paragraphs unchanged] Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited. [1 paragraph unchanged] To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) were established as part of the Health and Social Care Act in 2012 and are responsible for the commissioning of health care services across England. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) have a statutory responsibility for commissioning most NHS services and are responsible for approximately 2/3 of the total NHS budget. Increasingly they are also involved in commissioning primary care and some specialised services. CCGs are groups of local GP practices whose governing bodies include GPs, others clinicians such as nurses and secondary care consultants, patient representatives, general managers and – in some cases – practice managers and local authority representatives. CCGs have both statutory duties and statutory powers in relation to commissioning healthcare services including but not limited to: o Community health services o Maternity services o Elective hospital care o Rehabilitation services o Accident & Emergency o Ambulance services o Out-of-hours services o Older people’s healthcare services o Healthcare services for children o Healthcare services for people with mental health conditions o Healthcare services for people with learning disabilities o Continuing healthcare o Abortion services o Infertility services o Wheelchair services o Home oxygen services o Treatment of infectious diseases CCGs statutory duties and power are defined within the Health and Social Care Act 2012. Data is required to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services and meet the CCGs duties and powers. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area. [1 paragraph unchanged] The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services: The data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) The overarching objectives of the CCG and use of these data is to: - Local Provider Flows - Promote accountability and service improvements locally o Acute - Ensure value for money is achieved o Ambulance - Fulfil statutory functions o Community - Promote population health management by o Demand for Service a. Understanding the interdependency of care services o Diagnostic Service b. Targeting care more effectively o Emergency Care c. Using value as the redesign principle o Experience, Quality and Outcomes d. Promoting interoperability across care pathways o Mental Health e. Investigating the needs of the population o Other Not Elsewhere Classified - Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk and managing needs o Population Data - Stratify patients by highlighting those patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls. o Primary Care Services - Identifying gaps in service and where individuals may slip through the net. o Public Health Screening - Identifying duplications in service provision. - Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) - Identifying of underlying disease prevalence with the local population through Health Needs Assessments. - Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) The data will further be used for quality and validation purposes, to allow quality checks on the submitted data and to aid in the redesign of services throughout the local region. - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) Optum Health Solutions (IK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project - Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave 2 Population Health Management CCG. NHS England has contracted Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd to work with selected CCGs to undertake population health and actuarial analysis to build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. The Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd involvement is for 20 weeks, anticipated to start in March 2020 for approximately 20 weeks. Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for this project will be destroyed within 6 months of completion of the project and permissions as a data processor the this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment. - Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) - Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) - National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) - National Diabetes Audit (NDA) - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes:  Population health management: • Understanding the interdependency of care services • Targeting care more effectively • Using value as the redesign principle  Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data  Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them  Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs  Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated  Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another  Service redesign  Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population  Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd

Processing activities

DATA The following datasets are released by NHS Digital to the controllership of the CCG: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) - Local Provider Flows o Acute o Ambulance o Community o Demand for Service o Diagnostic Service o Emergency Care o Experience, Quality and Outcomes o Mental Health o Other Not Elsewhere Classified o Population Data o Primary Care Services o Public Health Screening - Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) - Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) - Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) - Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) - Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) - National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) - National Diabetes Audit (NDA) - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) IDENTIFIABILITY SUS+ data identifiable only at the level of NHS number may be released by NHS Digital to the nominated Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) for the CCG for the purpose of Invoice Validation. SUS+ data identifiable only at the level of NHS number may be released by NHS Digital to the approved Risk Stratification provider for the CCG for the purpose of Risk Stratification. All data released by NHS Digital used for the purpose of commissioning is pseudonymised prior to release by NHS Digital. LINKAGE The following linkage is permitted: - SUS+ data identifiable at the level of NHS number is permitted to be linked with backing data only for the purpose of Invoice Validation. Backing data is a specified data set, detail of which is included in the ‘Who Pays? Information Governance Advice for Invoice Validation’ published by NHS England. The data set is in line with the Section 251, CAG 7-07(a)/2013, CAG 7-07(b)/2013 and CAG 7-07(c)/2013, approval. - SUS+ data identifiable at the level of NHS number is permitted to be linked with GP data only for the purpose of Risk Stratification. - Any pseudonymised data sets released by NHS Digital for the purpose of commissioning may be linked to another pseudonymised data set released by NHS Digital, only where both datasets are contained within this agreement. - Any combination of pseudonymised data set released by NHS Digital for the purpose of commissioning, under this agreement may be linked to GP and Social Care data only where the GP and Social Care data has been consistently pseudonymised by an NHS Digital approved method. PROCESSORS The following data processor is the nominated Controlled Environment for Finance and can access the following data for the purpose of Invoice Validation: NHS South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) The following data processors can access the following data for the purpose of Risk Stratification: NHS South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Healthcare Limited: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) The following data processors can access the following data for the purpose of commissioning: NHS South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) - Local Provider Flows o Acute o Ambulance o Community o Demand for Service o Diagnostic Service o Emergency Care o Experience, Quality and Outcomes o Mental Health o Other Not Elsewhere Classified o Population Data o Primary Care Services o Public Health Screening - Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) - Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) - Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) - Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) - Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) - National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) - National Diabetes Audit (NDA) - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Optum Health Solutions: - Secondary Uses Service (SUS+) - Local Provider Flows o Acute o Ambulance o Community o Demand for Service o Diagnostic Service o Emergency Care o Experience, Quality and Outcomes o Mental Health o Other Not Elsewhere Classified o Population Data o Primary Care Services o Public Health Screening - Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) - only for the NHSE PHM Project - Community Services Data Set (CSDS) - only for the NHSE PHM Project PROCESSING PURPOSES Invoice Validation: The following processing purposes are permitted under this agreement: a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and/or provider backing flow data. b. Checking against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are: i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area. iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance. c. Reviewing retrospective payments to identify overpayments, duplications and missing payments The CEfF inform the CCG: - Of any invoices that have been validated may be paid - Of any duplications, overpayments or missing payments The CEfF will investigate any discrepancies or non-validated invoices directly with the provider on behalf of the CCG. The CCG will receive a notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received, pending and processed. The CEfF are permitted to make pseudonymised data available to the CCG. Risk Stratification: The following processing purposes are permitted under this agreement: - Processing of data to calculate a risk score and profile - Support of case finding - GP reporting - Production of GP dashboards - Statistical and predictive modelling Commissioning: The following processing purposes are permitted under this agreement: - Population health management: o Understanding the interdependency of care services o Targeting care more effectively o Using value as the redesign principle o Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated - Data Quality and Validation o Allowing data quality and validation checks on the submitted data o Checking recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers - Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them - Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models. - Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs - See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning. - Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population. - Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another DATA MINIMISATION Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied - Invoice Validation: Only data related to patients who are resident or registered within the CCG region may be released and processed for the named purposes within the agreement. Risk Stratification: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Berkshire West CCG region (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner Commissioning: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Berkshire West CCG region (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner). and/or • Patients treated by a provider where NHS Berkshire West CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. and/or • Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Berkshire West CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. Further minimisation of data before release is permitted and should be agreed by the Data Controller and NHS Digital production. ONWARD SHARING No identifiable data should be released by the CEfF. Patient level data is not permitted to be share outside of the CCG. Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set. SEGREGATION: Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital. Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors. RESTRICTIONS [5 paragraphs unchanged] The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data. NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract i.e.: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data) NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data) Microsoft UK supply provide Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. Nominated CEfFs should be listed on the NHS England List of Controlled Environment for Finance Organisations. It is the data controller’s responsibility to ensure the CEfF has submitted a Controlled Environments for Finance compliance statement to NHS England. [2 paragraphs unchanged] The only identifier available in the data set (for Risk Stratification ) is the NHS numbers. Any further identification of the patients will only [8 words unchanged] own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship. Onward Sharing Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for the purpose of the NHS England Wave 2 PHM project will be destroyed within 6 months of the completion of the project and permissions as a data processor will be removed from this agreement by amendment. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data. Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set. Segregation Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. Data will be held separately from that for the purpose of direct care. Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital. Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors. Data Minimisation Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied - For the purpose of Commissioning: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the NHS Berkshire West CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner). and/or • Patients treated by a provider where NHS Berkshire West CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. and/or • Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of NHS Berkshire West CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows. For the purpose of Risk Stratification: • Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within NHS Berkshire West CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner For the purpose of Invoice Validation: • CCG of residence and/or registration. Microsoft UK supply Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. Invoice Validation - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit 1. Identifiable SUS+ Data is obtained from the SUS+ Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. 3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider. 4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes: a. Validating that the Clinical Commissioning Group are responsible for payment for the care of the individual by using SUS+ and/or provider backing flow data. b. Once the provider backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are: i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area. iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance. 5. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit CEfF team and the provider, meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc. RISK STRATIFICATION - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit 1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit, who securely hold the SUS+ data. 3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. 4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor. 5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient. 6. Once South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG. Risk Stratification - Data Processor 3 - Graphnet Health Limited 1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to Graphnet Health Limited, who securely hold the SUS+ data. 3. Identifiable GP Data is sourced from the CareCentric Shared Care Record system held by Graphnet Health Limited. 4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification algorithm within the CareCentric system by the data processor. 5. GPs will have access to the risk stratification scores within the CareCentric system. Clinicians will open their clinical system and launch CareCentric from within it, to access risk stratification reports. 6. The application allows Clinicians (in this instance GPs) to access risk stratification scores for patients alongside further information from the Shared Care Record, providing up to date information on events within primary care, secondary care, community care, mental health and social care. This supports better and more effective clinical decision making and saves time for clinicians as they do not have to search through different systems to gather information on a patients care. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient. 7. Once Graphnet Health Limited has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG. Commissioning The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets: 1. SUS+ 2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers) a. Acute b. Ambulance c. Community d. Demand for Service e. Diagnostic Service f. Emergency Care g. Experience, Quality and Outcomes h. Mental Health i. Other Not Elsewhere Classified j. Population Data k. Primary Care Services l. Public Health Screening 3. Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) 4. Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) 5. Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) 6. Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) 7. Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) 8. Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) 9. Community Services Data Set (CSDS) 10. Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) 11. National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) 12. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births) 13. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) 14. National Diabetes Audit (NDA) 15. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows: Data Processor 1 – NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit 1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. 2. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit add derived fields, link data and provide analysis to: a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers c. Undertake population health management d. Undertake data quality and validation checks e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments 3. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1. 4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set. Data Processor 2 – Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd 1) Pseudonymised SUS+, and Local Provider data only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd. 2) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd add derived fields, link SUS fields and provide analysis to: o See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning (CCG). o Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers (CCG). o Undertake population health management o Undertake data quality and validation checks o Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population o Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk o Conduct Health Needs Assessments 3) Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1. 4) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 5) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 6) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.

Expected output

[7 paragraphs unchanged] 5. Identification and recovery of monies which would otherwise be lost 6. Assurances over the robustness of internal control mechanisms relating to the payment of invoices and/or suggested improvements [19 paragraphs unchanged] RISK STRATIFICATION - Graphnet Healthcare Ltd In addition, Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:- Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:- [4 paragraphs unchanged] The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender, pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity. pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity. [1 paragraph unchanged] 1. Commissioner reporting: CCGs produce a range of outputs to meet their objectives. These include but are not limited to: a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD). A. Reporting: b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD. In exercising its functions, the CCG must comply with the statutory duties set out in the NHS Act and/or any directions made by NHS England or the Secretary of State. As such, the CCG produce a variety of reports including but not limited to: c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD. a. Statutory returns (monthly/quarterly/yearly) d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD. b. Provider reports e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD. c. Patient Outcome Data reports f. Provider reporting. d. Delayed discharge reports g. Statutory returns. e. Quality and performance reports h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return. f. Business Intelligence reports – aggregate level i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return. g. Dashboard reports for GPs j. Delayed discharges. B. Readmissions: k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting. The CCG will provide analysis on readmissions which may include such things as: numbers of readmissions; discharge diagnosis; behavioural health comorbidity; days between discharge and readmission; high utilisers; considered target populations; readmission patterns. 2. Readmissions analysis. C. Projects and Programmes: 3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence. CCGs undertake many projects and programmes. Using data provided, CCGs will produce project and programme level dashboards. 4. Production of project / programme level dashboards. D. Patient Stratification: 5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix. CCGs will investigate trends in those patients at highest risk. Risk may be defined in relation to the following: 6. Clinical coding reviews / audits. - Admission 7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level. - Readmission 8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers. - Use of multiple services 9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports - Referrals to secondary care 10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data - High cost services 11. Contract Management and Modelling - High cost prescriptions 12. Patient Stratification, such as: - Frail and elderly o Patients at highest risk of admission - Movement between services o Most expensive patients (top 15%) E. Reviews and Audits: o Frail and elderly Data will enable reviews and audits of clinical coding (the translation of medical terminology written by the clinician to describe the patient’s circumstances). o Patients that are currently in hospital F. Contract and Financial Management: o Patients with most referrals to secondary care Data will be used to manage CCG budgets and assist GPs, undertake validation checks, check recorded activity against contracts or invoices so that discussions can be facilitated between commissioners and contract providers. The ability to validate claims that are not being made after an individual has died. o Patients with most emergency activity G. Population Health Management: o Patients with most expensive prescriptions Data will be used to produced data tables and visualisation to be able to communicate information efficiently to users via statistical graphs, plots, information graphics and charts. Data can be used to produce dashboards. These mediums will enable: o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another - Understanding of population and activity i. Discharged from hospital - Grouping the population into patient segments based on demographic and clinical features ii. Discharged from community - Monitoring of bespoke cohorts of patients e.g. frail elderly 13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services. - Understanding and forecasting costs at provider level 14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die. - Health needs assessment, for example, identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions, or combinations of conditions 15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support. - Population projections of Activity and Spend 16. Understanding where patients are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust. - Actuarial projections of Activity and Spend 17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports. - Analysis of intersegmental drift 18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity. - Production of Theographs - Opportunity analysis based on prevalence of specific diseases - Developing business models The outputs will be in aggregate and patient level de-identified format. H. Monitoring: Outputs will include a variety of monitoring including, but not limited to: - Acute/community/mental health quality matrix - CCG outcome indicators - Financial and non-financial validation of activity - Multiple attendances - Case management - Contract monitoring - In-year project monitoring I. Benchmarking: The CCG are able to compare and contrast performance against similar CCGs. The CCG can provide feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual level (but only on data initially provided by the service provider) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project The outputs, as part of the NHS England Wave 2 PHM national programme will identify patient cohorts and inequalities in outcome, spend and opportunity for further investigation, with a view to improving service delivery and patient health outcomes. Wave 2 PHM will also begin to develop the CCG capability to undertake actuarial analysis of linked datasets from multiple care settings to develop further the understanding of the wider determinants of health across the population. All outputs will be delivered within the timescales of the contract between Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd and the CCG.

Expected measurable benefits

[3 paragraphs unchanged] 2. Ensuring that service providers are accurately paid for the patients patients’ treatment. [2 paragraphs unchanged] 5. Fulfilling commissioners commissioner’s duties to fiscal probity and scrutiny. [4 paragraphs unchanged] 10. Meeting commissioning objectives without compromising patient confidentiality [6 paragraphs unchanged] 5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and healthcare outcomes 6. healthcare outcomes [1 paragraph unchanged] RISK STRATIFICATION - GRAPHNET HEALTH CARE LTD In addition, although Graphnet are integrating the same algorithms as the South Central and West Integrated Population Analytics (SCW IPA) solution currently in use in Berkshire West, the implementation is different because: Although Graphnet are integrating the same algorithms as the South Central and West Integrated Population Analytics (SCW IPA) solution currently in use in Berkshire West, the implementation is different because: [4 paragraphs unchanged] 1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways. In line with the Five Year Forward View, expected benefits include, but are not limited to: a. Analysis to support full business cases. A. Prevention: b. Develop business models. 1. Earlier identification of patients on disease pathways. c. Monitor In year projects. 2. Increase in attainment of individual health goals (for example: quitting smoking, increased level of exercise, healthier diet). 2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types. 3. Reduction in health-related unemployment and work absence. 3. Health economic modelling using: 4. Reduction in incidence of preventable diseases. a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets. 5. Reduction in the number of premature deaths. b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients. B. Integrated Care: c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway. 6. Increase in co-operation between NHS services and voluntary sector. d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC). 7. Increase of out-of-hospital care. 4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity. 8. Increase in patients accessing specialist advice where their disease pathway requires specialist support. 5. Enables monitoring of: 9. Reduction in inappropriate admissions to hospitals. a. CCG outcome indicators. 10. Increase in patients receiving case management. b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity. 11. Increase in local understanding of where variation in the use of services occurs. c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. C. Patient Empowerment: d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions. 12. Increase in patient education and awareness relating to the management of their care e. Case management. 13. Increase in the activation of patients in the management of their individual healthcare f. Care service planning. D. Community Engagement: g. Commissioning and performance management. 14. Increase in democratic leadership on public health. h. List size verification by GP practices. 15. Reduction in pressures on carers. i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes. 16. Increase in volunteers from local communities. 6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers. E. Value for Money: 7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these. 17. Reduction in low value treatments. 8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency re-admissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care. 18. Reduction in costs of a treatment. 9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required. 19. Reduction in costly treatments arising from prevented illness. 10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework. 20. Reduction in management and administration costs. 11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics. 21. Increase in staff satisfaction, recruitment and retention. 12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts F. Other: 13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities. 22. Reduction in inconsistency in approaches to data use. 14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed. 23. Enhancing the quality of life for people with long-term conditions 15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice. 24. Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or following injury 16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region. 25. Ensuring people have a positive experience of care 17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years . 26. Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm 27. Support of: a. Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) b. Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) 28. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. 29. Grouping and re-costing of previous activity. 30. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics. 31. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts. 32. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.

Objective for processing

INVOICE VALIDATION

Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.

Providers submit invoices to the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG), so the CCG is able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.

To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.

COMMISSIONING

Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) were established as part of the Health and Social Care Act in 2012 and are responsible for the commissioning of health care services across England.

Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) have a statutory responsibility for commissioning most NHS services and are responsible for approximately 2/3 of the total NHS budget. Increasingly they are also involved in commissioning primary care and some specialised services.

CCGs are groups of local GP practices whose governing bodies include GPs, others clinicians such as nurses and secondary care consultants, patient representatives, general managers and – in some cases – practice managers and local authority representatives.

CCGs have both statutory duties and statutory powers in relation to commissioning healthcare services including but not limited to:

o Community health services

o Maternity services

o Elective hospital care

o Rehabilitation services

o Accident & Emergency

o Ambulance services

o Out-of-hours services

o Older people’s healthcare services

o Healthcare services for children

o Healthcare services for people with mental health conditions

o Healthcare services for people with learning disabilities

o Continuing healthcare

o Abortion services

o Infertility services

o Wheelchair services

o Home oxygen services

o Treatment of infectious diseases

CCGs statutory duties and power are defined within the Health and Social Care Act 2012.

Data is required to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services and meet the CCGs duties and powers. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

The overarching objectives of the CCG and use of these data is to:

- Promote accountability and service improvements locally

- Ensure value for money is achieved

- Fulfil statutory functions

- Promote population health management by

a. Understanding the interdependency of care services

b. Targeting care more effectively

c. Using value as the redesign principle

d. Promoting interoperability across care pathways

e. Investigating the needs of the population

- Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk and managing needs

- Stratify patients by highlighting those patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls.

- Identifying gaps in service and where individuals may slip through the net.

- Identifying duplications in service provision.

- Identifying of underlying disease prevalence with the local population through Health Needs Assessments.

The data will further be used for quality and validation purposes, to allow quality checks on the submitted data and to aid in the redesign of services throughout the local region.

Optum Health Solutions (IK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

NHS Berkshire West CCG is working with NHS England as a Wave 2 Population Health Management CCG. NHS England has contracted Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd to work with selected CCGs to undertake population health and actuarial analysis to build up a methodology for dissemination across the NHS in England. The Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd involvement is for 20 weeks, anticipated to start in March 2020 for approximately 20 weeks. Data held by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd for this project will be destroyed within 6 months of completion of the project and permissions as a data processor the this project will be removed from this agreement by amendment.

Expected output

INVOICE VALIDATION

1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.

2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:

a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues

b. Assist in business intelligence

3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.

4. Budget control of the CCG.

5. Identification and recovery of monies which would otherwise be lost

6. Assurances over the robustness of internal control mechanisms relating to the payment of invoices and/or suggested improvements

RISK STRATIFICATION

1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.

2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

CCGs will be able to:

3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.

4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.

5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.

6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.

7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.

8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.

9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.

11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.

12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.

13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.

14. Analyse based on specific diseases

In addition:

- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.

- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.

In addition, Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:-

 Patients at risk of emergency hospitalisation

 Probability of an extended stay in hospital

 Probability of a patient being high cost

 Probability of a patient having high pharmacy costs.

The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender, pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity.

COMMISSIONING

CCGs produce a range of outputs to meet their objectives. These include but are not limited to:

A. Reporting:

In exercising its functions, the CCG must comply with the statutory duties set out in the NHS Act and/or any directions made by NHS England or the Secretary of State. As such, the CCG produce a variety of reports including but not limited to:

a. Statutory returns (monthly/quarterly/yearly)

b. Provider reports

c. Patient Outcome Data reports

d. Delayed discharge reports

e. Quality and performance reports

f. Business Intelligence reports – aggregate level

g. Dashboard reports for GPs

B. Readmissions:

The CCG will provide analysis on readmissions which may include such things as: numbers of readmissions; discharge diagnosis; behavioural health comorbidity; days between discharge and readmission; high utilisers; considered target populations; readmission patterns.

C. Projects and Programmes:

CCGs undertake many projects and programmes. Using data provided, CCGs will produce project and programme level dashboards.

D. Patient Stratification:

CCGs will investigate trends in those patients at highest risk. Risk may be defined in relation to the following:

- Admission

- Readmission

- Use of multiple services

- Referrals to secondary care

- High cost services

- High cost prescriptions

- Frail and elderly

- Movement between services

E. Reviews and Audits:

Data will enable reviews and audits of clinical coding (the translation of medical terminology written by the clinician to describe the patient’s circumstances).

F. Contract and Financial Management:

Data will be used to manage CCG budgets and assist GPs, undertake validation checks, check recorded activity against contracts or invoices so that discussions can be facilitated between commissioners and contract providers. The ability to validate claims that are not being made after an individual has died.

G. Population Health Management:

Data will be used to produced data tables and visualisation to be able to communicate information efficiently to users via statistical graphs, plots, information graphics and charts. Data can be used to produce dashboards. These mediums will enable:

- Understanding of population and activity

- Grouping the population into patient segments based on demographic and clinical features

- Monitoring of bespoke cohorts of patients e.g. frail elderly

- Understanding and forecasting costs at provider level

- Health needs assessment, for example, identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions, or combinations of conditions

- Population projections of Activity and Spend

- Actuarial projections of Activity and Spend

- Analysis of intersegmental drift

- Production of Theographs

- Opportunity analysis based on prevalence of specific diseases

- Developing business models

The outputs will be in aggregate and patient level de-identified format.

H. Monitoring:

Outputs will include a variety of monitoring including, but not limited to:

- Acute/community/mental health quality matrix

- CCG outcome indicators

- Financial and non-financial validation of activity

- Multiple attendances

- Case management

- Contract monitoring

- In-year project monitoring

I. Benchmarking:

The CCG are able to compare and contrast performance against similar CCGs. The CCG can provide feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual level (but only on data initially provided by the service provider)

Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd - NHS England Wave 2 PHM Project

The outputs, as part of the NHS England Wave 2 PHM national programme will identify patient cohorts and inequalities in outcome, spend and opportunity for further investigation, with a view to improving service delivery and patient health outcomes.

Wave 2 PHM will also begin to develop the CCG capability to undertake actuarial analysis of linked datasets from multiple care settings to develop further the understanding of the wider determinants of health across the population. All outputs will be delivered within the timescales of the contract between Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd and the CCG.

DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v4.2 23 October 2019 to 22 October 2022
Title
DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV
Commercial
No
Sublicensing
No
Datasets
27
Files released
0

Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); National Diabetes Audit; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners

What changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v3.3

Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.

Fields changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v3.3
FieldWasBecame
Start date2019-08-052019-10-23
End date2022-08-042022-10-22

Objective for processing

[8 paragraphs unchanged] Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited. [31 paragraphs unchanged] The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes: [14 paragraphs unchanged]

Processing activities

[3 paragraphs unchanged] All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their role. role and the tasks that they are required to undertake. Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed [16 words unchanged] will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data. [3 paragraphs unchanged] (RS) The only identifier available in the data set is the NHS numbers. [16 words unchanged] own systems for the purpose of direct care with a legitimate relationship. [4 paragraphs unchanged] Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. Data will be held separately from that for the purpose of direct care. [15 paragraphs unchanged] Microsoft UK supply Cloud Services for Graphnet Healthcare Ltd and are therefore listed as a data processor. They supply support to the system, but do not access or process data. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data. [1 paragraph unchanged] Invoice Validation Invoice Validation - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit [10 paragraphs unchanged] Risk Stratification RISK STRATIFICATION - Data Processor 1 - NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit [4 paragraphs unchanged] 5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access [45 words unchanged] the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient. 6. Once South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit has completed the processing, [6 words unchanged] system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG. Risk Stratification - Data Processor 3 - Graphnet Health Limited 1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). 2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to Graphnet Health Limited, who securely hold the SUS+ data. 3. Identifiable GP Data is sourced from the CareCentric Shared Care Record system held by Graphnet Health Limited. 4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification algorithm within the CareCentric system by the data processor. 5. GPs will have access to the risk stratification scores within the CareCentric system. Clinicians will open their clinical system and launch CareCentric from within it, to access risk stratification reports. 6. The application allows Clinicians (in this instance GPs) to access risk stratification scores for patients alongside further information from the Shared Care Record, providing up to date information on events within primary care, secondary care, community care, mental health and social care. This supports better and more effective clinical decision making and saves time for clinicians as they do not have to search through different systems to gather information on a patients care. Where GPs access identifiable data, this is for the purpose of Direct Care and only when the GP has a legitimate relationship with the patient. 7. Once Graphnet Health Limited has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. ONLY pseudonymised data is available to the CCG. [30 paragraphs unchanged] Data Processor 1 – South NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit [27 paragraphs unchanged]

Expected output

[26 paragraphs unchanged] RISK STRATIFICATION - Graphnet Healthcare Ltd Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:-  Patients at risk of emergency hospitalisation  Probability of an extended stay in hospital  Probability of a patient being high cost  Probability of a patient having high pharmacy costs. The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender, pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity. [40 paragraphs unchanged]

Expected measurable benefits

[19 paragraphs unchanged] RISK STRATIFICATION - GRAPHNET HEALTH CARE LTD Although Graphnet are integrating the same algorithms as the South Central and West Integrated Population Analytics (SCW IPA) solution currently in use in Berkshire West, the implementation is different because: • The primary data source used to feed the algorithms is updated much more regularly than the IPA system is. The data is fed from the CareCentric shared care record utilises near real time data flows in some cases. • Rather than risk stratification being available in a separate standalone system, risk stratification scores will be available to view within the CareCentric application. This is a big bonus for clinicians who can open their clinical system and launch CareCentric from within it, accessing risk stratification reports without extra user logins and websites / applications. • This application allows a clinician to access risk stratification scores for patients alongside further information from the shared care record, providing up to date information on events within primary care, secondary care, community care, mental health and social care. This supports better and more effective clinical decision making and again saves time for clinicians as they do not have to search through different systems to gather information on a patients care. [24 paragraphs unchanged] 8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, re-admissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care. [9 paragraphs unchanged]

Benefits reported

Stated in the previous version and removed here.

NA

Objective for processing

Invoice Validation

Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.

Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.

The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.

Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.

To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.

Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit and Graphnet Health Limited.

Commissioning

To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:

- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)

- Local Provider Flows

o Acute

o Ambulance

o Community

o Demand for Service

o Diagnostic Service

o Emergency Care

o Experience, Quality and Outcomes

o Mental Health

o Other Not Elsewhere Classified

o Population Data

o Primary Care Services

o Public Health Screening

- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)

- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)

- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)

- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)

- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)

- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)

- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)

- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)

- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)

- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

The pseudonymised data is required for the following purposes:

 Population health management:

• Understanding the interdependency of care services

• Targeting care more effectively

• Using value as the redesign principle

 Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

 Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them

 Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs

 Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated

 Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another

 Service redesign

 Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population

 Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd

Expected output

INVOICE VALIDATION

1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.

2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:

a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues

b. Assist in business intelligence

3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.

4. Budget control of the CCG.

RISK STRATIFICATION

1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.

2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

CCGs will be able to:

3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.

4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.

5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.

6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.

7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.

8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.

9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.

11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.

12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.

13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.

14. Analyse based on specific diseases

In addition:

- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.

- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.

RISK STRATIFICATION - Graphnet Healthcare Ltd

Graphnet Healthcare are working in partnership with Johns Hopkins ACG System to integrate

the established Adjusted clinical Groups algorithms within the CareCentric platform. There are

numerous risk models available to utilise but some of the most common ones used are:-

 Patients at risk of emergency hospitalisation

 Probability of an extended stay in hospital

 Probability of a patient being high cost

 Probability of a patient having high pharmacy costs.

The ACG system allows a user to stratify the population by the scale of morbidity, age, gender,

pharmacy, resource utilisation and multimorbidity with a particular emphasis on co-morbidity.

COMMISSIONING

1. Commissioner reporting:

a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).

b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.

c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.

d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.

e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.

f. Provider reporting.

g. Statutory returns.

h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.

i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.

j. Delayed discharges.

k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.

2. Readmissions analysis.

3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.

4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.

5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.

6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.

7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.

8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports

10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

11. Contract Management and Modelling

12. Patient Stratification, such as:

o Patients at highest risk of admission

o Most expensive patients (top 15%)

o Frail and elderly

o Patients that are currently in hospital

o Patients with most referrals to secondary care

o Patients with most emergency activity

o Patients with most expensive prescriptions

o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another

i. Discharged from hospital

ii. Discharged from community

13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.

14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.

15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.

16. Understanding where patients are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.

17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.

18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.

DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v3.3 5 August 2019 to 4 August 2022
Title
DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV
Commercial
No
Sublicensing
No
Datasets
27
Files released
0

Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); National Diabetes Audit; Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs); Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners

What changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v2.3

Text removed is struck through; text added is underlined. Unchanged paragraphs are summarised rather than repeated.

Fields changed from DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v2.3
FieldWasBecame
Start date2019-05-012019-08-05
End date2022-04-302022-08-04
Acute-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Children and Young People Health: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Civil Registration - Births: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Civil Registrations of Death: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Community Services Data Set (CSDS): common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Community-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID): common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set_v1.5: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Maternity Services Data Set v1.5: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS): common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS): common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS): common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Mental Health-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS): common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Population Data-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)
SUS for Commissioners: common law duty of confidentialitySection 251 NHS Act 2006Mixture of confidential data flow(s) with support under section 251 NHS Act 2006 and non-confidential data flow(s)

Datasets: + National Diabetes Audit; + Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

Objective for processing

[2 paragraphs unchanged] Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is [46 words unchanged] of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further. [33 paragraphs unchanged] - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths) (Births) - Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) - National Diabetes Audit (NDA) - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) [15 paragraphs unchanged]

Processing activities

[14 paragraphs unchanged] Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold identifiable data with opt outs applied and identifiable data with opt outs not applied, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked. [18 paragraphs unchanged] 3. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes: 3. The CEfF also receive backing data from the provider. 4. South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes: [5 paragraphs unchanged] 4. 5. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can [44 words unchanged] management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc. [32 paragraphs unchanged] 12. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths) (Births) 13. Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths) 14. National Diabetes Audit (NDA) 15. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) [2 paragraphs unchanged] 1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), [9 words unchanged] (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS). (CSDS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS), National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT) and (CWT), Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths) Deaths), National Diabetes Audit (NDA) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit. [13 paragraphs unchanged] 1) Pseudonymised SUS+ SUS+, and Local Provider data only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd. [8 paragraphs unchanged] 3) Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 3) Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1. 4) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or then pass the CCG as instructed by processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG. 5) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared. 5) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd or the CCG as instructed by the CCG. 6) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.

Expected measurable benefits

[52 paragraphs unchanged] 17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years. years .

Unchanged: Expected output, Benefits reported.

Objective for processing

Invoice Validation

Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.

Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.

The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.

Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.

To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.

Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Commissioning

To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:

- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)

- Local Provider Flows

o Acute

o Ambulance

o Community

o Demand for Service

o Diagnostic Service

o Emergency Care

o Experience, Quality and Outcomes

o Mental Health

o Other Not Elsewhere Classified

o Population Data

o Primary Care Services

o Public Health Screening

- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)

- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)

- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)

- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)

- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)

- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)

- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)

- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Deaths)

- National Diabetes Audit (NDA)

- Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:

 Population health management:

• Understanding the interdependency of care services

• Targeting care more effectively

• Using value as the redesign principle

 Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

 Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them

 Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs

 Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated

 Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another

 Service redesign

 Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population

 Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd

Expected output

Invoice Validation

1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.

2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:

a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues

b. Assist in business intelligence

3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.

4. Budget control of the CCG.

Risk Stratification

1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.

2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

CCGs will be able to:

3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.

4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.

5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.

6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.

7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.

8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.

9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.

11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.

12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.

13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.

14. Analyse based on specific diseases

In addition:

- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.

- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.

Commissioning

1. Commissioner reporting:

a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).

b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.

c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.

d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.

e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.

f. Provider reporting.

g. Statutory returns.

h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.

i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.

j. Delayed discharges.

k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.

2. Readmissions analysis.

3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.

4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.

5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.

6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.

7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.

8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports

10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

11. Contract Management and Modelling

12. Patient Stratification, such as:

o Patients at highest risk of admission

o Most expensive patients (top 15%)

o Frail and elderly

o Patients that are currently in hospital

o Patients with most referrals to secondary care

o Patients with most emergency activity

o Patients with most expensive prescriptions

o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another

i. Discharged from hospital

ii. Discharged from community

13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.

14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.

15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.

16. Understanding where patients are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.

17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.

18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.

Benefits reported

NA

DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B-v2.3 1 May 2019 to 30 April 2022
Title
DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV
Commercial
No
Sublicensing
No
Datasets
25
Files released
0

Datasets: Acute-Local Provider Flows; Ambulance-Local Provider Flows; Children and Young People Health; Civil Registration - Births; Civil Registrations of Death; Community Services Data Set (CSDS); Community-Local Provider Flows; Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows; Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID); Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows; Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows; Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5; Maternity Services Data Set; Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS); Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS); Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS); Mental Health-Local Provider Flows; National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS); Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows; Population Data-Local Provider Flows; Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows; Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows; SUS for Commissioners; SUS for Commissioners

Objective for processing

Invoice Validation

Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.

Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so the CCG is are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets (data from providers) and will not be used further.

The CCG are advised by the appointed CEfF whether payment for invoices can be made or not.

Invoice Validation will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk (of health deterioration and using multiple services) or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.

To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for both individual and groups of vulnerable patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.

Risk Stratification will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit

Commissioning

To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:

- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)

- Local Provider Flows

o Acute

o Ambulance

o Community

o Demand for Service

o Diagnostic Service

o Emergency Care

o Experience, Quality and Outcomes

o Mental Health

o Other Not Elsewhere Classified

o Population Data

o Primary Care Services

o Public Health Screening

- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)

- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)

- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)

- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)

- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)

- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)

- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)

- National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring Data Set (CWT)

- Civil Registries Data (CRD) (Births and Deaths)

The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:

 Population health management:

• Understanding the interdependency of care services

• Targeting care more effectively

• Using value as the redesign principle

 Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

 Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them

 Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs

 Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated

 Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another

 Service redesign

 Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population

 Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to highlight patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

Processing for commissioning will be conducted by South Central and West Commissioning Support Unit & Optum Health Solutions (UK) Ltd

Expected output

Invoice Validation

1. The Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) will enable the CCG to challenge invoices and raise discrepancies and disputes.

2. Outputs from the CEfF will enable accurate production of budget reports, which will:

a. Assist in addressing poor quality data issues

b. Assist in business intelligence

3. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events where a service delivered to a patient by a provider that does not have a written contract with the patient’s responsible commissioner, but does have a written contract with another NHS commissioner/s.

4. Budget control of the CCG.

Risk Stratification

1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.

2. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.

CCGs will be able to:

3. Target specific vulnerable patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions.

4. Reduce hospital readmissions and targeting clinical interventions to high risk patients.

5. Identify patients at risk of deterioration and providing effective care.

6. Reduce in the difference in the quality of care between those with the best and worst outcomes.

7. Re-design care to reduce admissions.

8. Set up capitated budgets – budgets based on care provided to the specific population.

9. Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

10. Monitor vulnerable groups of patients including but not limited to frailty, COPD, Diabetes, elderly.

11. Health needs assessments – identifying numbers of patients with specific health conditions or combination of conditions.

12. Classify vulnerable groups based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost.

13. Production of Theographs – a visual timeline of a patients encounters with hospital providers.

14. Analyse based on specific diseases

In addition:

- The risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.

- Record level output (pseudonymised) will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. Onward sharing of this data is not permitted.

Commissioning

1. Commissioner reporting:

a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).

b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.

c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.

d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.

e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.

f. Provider reporting.

g. Statutory returns.

h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.

i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.

j. Delayed discharges.

k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.

2. Readmissions analysis.

3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.

4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.

5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.

6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.

7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.

8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports

10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data

11. Contract Management and Modelling

12. Patient Stratification, such as:

o Patients at highest risk of admission

o Most expensive patients (top 15%)

o Frail and elderly

o Patients that are currently in hospital

o Patients with most referrals to secondary care

o Patients with most emergency activity

o Patients with most expensive prescriptions

o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another

i. Discharged from hospital

ii. Discharged from community

13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.

14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.

15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.

16. Understanding where patients are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.

17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.

18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.

Benefits reported

NA

Register history

When this agreement appeared in, or was edited in, each monthly edition of the register. Built by comparing every edition this site holds, the earliest of which is July 2021.

"Amended in place" means NHS England changed the record without issuing a new version number. The register publishes no changelog for those edits; this site infers them by comparing editions. An edit is attributed to the edition it first appears in, not to the date it was made.

Cite this page

NHS England (2026) Data Uses Register, September 2026 edition, agreement DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B, “DSfC - NHS Berkshire West CCG - Comm, RS, IV”. Read via NHS Data Access Explorer (unofficial), https://healthdatauses.uk/agreements/dars-nic-186881-z9p9b/ (accessed [date]).

This address stays the same, but the page is rebuilt with each monthly edition, so the citation names the edition it shows. Every edition's data is kept in the facts store.

Source: datausesregister_september2026.xlsx, September 2026 edition of the NHS England Data Uses Register. Search that workbook for DARS-NIC-186881-Z9P9B to see the original rows.